"Follow-up of Midlines Placed Outside the Intensive Care Unit: What Side Effects? An Observational Study"
NCT ID: NCT04131088
Last Updated: 2023-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-12-23
2022-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Evaluation of Complications of MidLine Catheters in the ICU
NCT05412108
Midline Catheters Versus Peripheral Catheters in Internal Medicine Unit
NCT05512117
The Central Venous Catheter Related Complications in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03841240
A Study to Investigate the Possible Causes of Secondary Effects During Use of Peripheral Midline Type Catheter in Patients Hospitalized in Different Care Settings
NCT04391205
Comparison of Early Phase Infections Risk Between Midline and Piccline Caheters: MIDLINE AND PICCLINE CATHETERS
NCT05264402
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Midline is currently indicated for intravenous treatments \> 7 days and in patients with precarious venous capital. According to the manufacturer's instructions, it can be kept in place for up to 30 days, while the recommendations of the Centers disease of control specify that this period could be extended to 49 days.
Its use is expanding rapidly in France, thus meeting the needs of patients who do not require a central line and whose use of a standard peripheral venous catheter is not possible (low venous capital or treatment duration \> 7 days). Its installation, essentially carried out by qualified anaesthetists, does not increase medical planning and is therefore an attractive alternative to the installation of a central catheter whose complications (thrombosis and infections) are known.
The only data on the complication rate, estimated at 1-2%, are from low-potency observational studies. In the absence of high-level evidence, most of the good practice recommendations published in 2019 are based on expert consensus.
This leads us to conduct a large-scale observational study to assess the complication rate and identify the associated factors. This study will provide professionals with reliable scientific data for the next review of good practice recommendations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Follow up of midlines
The follow-up data to be collected will be recorded on a monitoring logbook that will follow the patient (Appendix 4). The latter will be involved in the follow-up of his data insofar as he will be able to solicit the various professionals performing care on his midline in order to aim at the exhaustiveness of the filling of the book.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No opposition to the study
* Patient requiring a midline
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with a contra indication to midline insertion: arterio-venous fistula, history of axillary lymph node clearance or radiotherapy in the infusion arm, presence of infectious skin lesions near the infusion area, presence of a prosthesis on the infusion arm or hemiplegic arm.
* Patient under legal protection measure
* Patient already enrolled
* Minor patient;
* Pregnant woman.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Derouin Y, Le Thuaut A, Dauvergne J, Cinotti R, Cartron E. Complications and risk factors on midline catheters' follow-up about non-ICU patients: study protocol for a multicentre observational study (the midDATA study). BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 18;13(7):e067796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067796.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC19_0073
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.