Midline Catheter Versus Long Peripheral Intravenous Catheter in Hospitalized Adult Patients
NCT ID: NCT05884294
Last Updated: 2025-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-02
2025-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Mini-midline and the Peripheral Intravenous Catheter
NCT06290284
CVCs Versus Midline Catheters
NCT06884176
Midline Catheters Versus Peripheral Catheters in Internal Medicine Unit
NCT05512117
Research on the Application of Blood Collection Through Midline Catheters of Different Lengths
NCT06014099
Prospective Evaluation of Complications of MidLine Catheters in the ICU
NCT05412108
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PowerGlide Pro Midline catheter.
The Intervention Group will be represented by hospitalized adult clinical patients who have been identified with difficult intravenous access. These patients will receive an ultrasound-guided insertion of the PowerGlide ProTM Midline 20G (10 cm).
PowerGlide Pro Midline catheter.
The Intervention Group will be represented by hospitalized adult clinical patients who have been identified with difficult intravenous access. These patients will receive an ultrasound-guided insertion of the PowerGlide ProTM Midline 20G (10 cm).
Introcan Safety Deep Access long peripheral venous catheter.
The control group will be subjected to the same selection criteria as the patients in the intervention group; however, they will receive an ultrasound-guided insertion of a long peripheral venous catheter Introcan Safety Deep Access 20G (6.4 cm).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PowerGlide Pro Midline catheter.
The Intervention Group will be represented by hospitalized adult clinical patients who have been identified with difficult intravenous access. These patients will receive an ultrasound-guided insertion of the PowerGlide ProTM Midline 20G (10 cm).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* indicated for continuous or intermittent intravenous therapy more than five days;
* identified with difficult intravenous access.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eneida R Rabelo da Silva, ScD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Teixeira TO, Hansel LA, Ceratti RDN, Brum ID, Fernandes AGDS, Saline CG, Junges M, Rabelo-Silva ER. Midline catheter (10 cm) versus long peripheral intravenous catheter (6.4 cm): Randomized clinical trial protocol with economic analysis. PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0319587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319587. eCollection 2025.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-0363
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.