Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Robotic Enhanced Error Training of Upper Limb Function in Post-stroke and Post TBI Participants
NCT ID: NCT06010823
Last Updated: 2023-09-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-30
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
One type of robotic training is error enhancement during three-dimensional movements. The goal of this approach is to elicit better accuracy, stability, fluidity and range of motion during reaching.
Previous research indicated the potential of robotic training with error enhancement as a viable clinical intervention for individuals facing motor deficits.
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new robotic system based on error enhancement and intended for rehabilitation of motor hand functions of post-stroke and TBI patients.
Methods: A randomized, multi-center study with an open-label design. The study sample will consist of 96 participants who will be randomized into 2 separate groups. The intervention group consisting of 48 patients will receive training with the new robotic system, while the control group consisting of additional 48 patients will receive only standard practice treatments (with no exposure to the new robotic system). The outcomes of safety (adverse events and treatment tolerability), and efficacy (motor function, speed, tone, and spasticity) will be assessed and compared between the two groups. The assessment of the outcomes will be conducted at four different time points: (1) prior to the initiation of the four-week intervention, (2) after 2 weeks of intervention, (3) at the conclusion of the intervention, and (4) at a three-month follow-up session.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robotic Enhanced Error Training of Upper Limb Function in Post-stroke Patients
NCT05174676
Robot-assisted Hand Rehabilitation for Patients With Stroke
NCT03392493
Feasibility of Unsupervised Therapy After Neurological or Orthopaedical Injury in the Home Setting With a Hand Rehabilitation Device (ReHandyBot) and an Assistive Smartphone Application (RehabCoach)
NCT07182734
Functional Recovery in Stroke Patients With Task-Specific Robot-Aided Arm Therapy
NCT00719433
Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Extremities
NCT02434237
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Traditional rehabilitative methods are often time-consuming and labor-intensive. Only a few of these methods induce slightly improved arm function, and a full recovery is often not achieved. Recently, studies have indicated that robotic training has promise for improving functional abilities among stroke survivors by enabling repetitive, adaptive, intensive, and accurate control of task complexity during the rehabilitation period. One type of robotic training that is particularly promising is error enhancement; this utilizes the adaptive capabilities of the nervous system to improve fine motor function of the arm.
Study Objectives: To evaluate the change in the upper limb function amongst post-stroke and post-TBI patients undergoing error enhancement treatment compared to a control group in the following domains:
1. Motor Function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), pinch and grip tests)
2. Speed (Box and Blocks Assessment)
3. Tone and Spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale)
In addition, this study will examine the safety and patient tolerability of the device.
Methods Population: A total of 96 participants will be recruited within 3 medical centers participating in the study. The recruitment will take place between 14 days and up to 18 months after the onset of the stroke or brain injury.
Recruitment: Electronic medical records of newly hospitalized patients will be screened to identify potential study participants. All eligible patients will be offered to participate. After obtaining informed consent, an intake session will take place for screening and evaluation purposes, conducted by a qualified occupational therapist. Patients successfully passing the screening session will undergo randomization to one of the two study arms with 1:1 ratio in each of the medical centers conducting the study.
All the treatments will be conducted a separate occupational therapist who will be blinded to the patient allocation group. Patients in the intervention arm will undergo training sessions with the robotic device, 3 times a week for a period up to 4 weeks, while the patients in the control arm will receive standard rehabilitative care.
Patients in both groups will undergo additional evaluation sessions at the following time points: after 2 weeks of intervention, at the conclusion of the intervention (4 weeks), and at a three-month follow-up session.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
All the participants allocated to this group will undergo rehabilitation according to each medical center's standard rehabilitation practice. In addition, the participants will receive 12 therapy sessions incorporating error enhancement (3 session a week, for a period of 4 weeks), lasting approximately 25-30 minutes each.
PlaXtreme
A robotic device capable of applying motor error enhancement forces during upper limb practice in a virtual environment. The forces stimulate the body's instinctive adaptive response, which does not require the use of cognition to correct the patients hand movement.
The device consists of a controller and specifically designed games projected on a screen requiring 3D active reaching movements. During the treatment sessions, the device will be operated by a trained occupational therapist.
Control
All participants allocated to this study group will undergo rehabilitation according to each medical center's standard rehabilitation practice.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PlaXtreme
A robotic device capable of applying motor error enhancement forces during upper limb practice in a virtual environment. The forces stimulate the body's instinctive adaptive response, which does not require the use of cognition to correct the patients hand movement.
The device consists of a controller and specifically designed games projected on a screen requiring 3D active reaching movements. During the treatment sessions, the device will be operated by a trained occupational therapist.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 14 days after the stroke or brain injury onset;
* No more than 18 months after stroke or brain injury onset;
* At least 4 weeks of remaining hospitalization in inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation ward;
* Voluntary provided informed consent obtained prior to any screening procedures;
* Cognitive status: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA test) score ≥ 22 or Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \> 24;
* Upper extremity function: Score between 35 and 52 points out of 66 on the Fugl- Meyer (FG) test with sub scores of 21-32/36 for the upper arm and 14-20/24 for the wrist and hand.
Exclusion Criteria
* Uncontrolled epilepsy;
* Upper-limb pain \> 6 on 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS);
* Concomitant or past medical conditions that might interfere with the study (i.e. hemi spatial neglect, orthopedic problems, etc.);
* Current participation in other interventional clinical study;
* Fingers spasticity score on the affected hand \> 3 on Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS);
* Pregnant or nursing women.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Loewenstein Hospital
OTHER
BioXtreme
UNKNOWN
Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rami Mansour, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loewenstein Rehabilitation Center
Raanana, , Israel
Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital
Tel Aviv, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0013-22-RRH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.