Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-25
2022-11-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A new device was developed, the deXtreme robot, a rehabilitation device that offers error-enhancement approach during three-dimensional movements. The goal error-enhancement is to elicit better accuracy, stability, fluidity and range of motion during reaching. games are projected on a screen, requiring 3D active reaching movements. The duration of the study for a single participant will be 7 consecutive working days, including 1 day of pre-intervention assessment, 5 days of training and 1 day of post-intervention assessment. The overall aim of this project is to gain knowledge into the potential of error-enhancement robot training in patients with upper limb impairments in the chronic phase after stroke. Hypothesizing that the 5-day training will have a positive effect on both the robotic and clinical outcome measures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
What do I Think I Can do and What do I Really do: the Use of the Arm in Daily Life After Stroke
NCT04430153
Error Augmentation for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Survivors
NCT07039006
A Novel Wrist Wearable Sensor System to Promote Hemiparetic Upper Extremity Use in Subacute Stroke Survivors
NCT06797154
Robotic Enhanced Error Training of Upper Limb Function in Post-stroke Patients
NCT05174676
The Jintronix Interactive System for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Training Post Stroke
NCT03759145
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The pilot study has a pre-post intervention design, recruiting 20 patients in the chronic phase after stroke. Error-enhancement treatment will be provided on day 2 to 6, i.e., for 5 consecutive days and will consist of facilitation of accuracy, range of movement, stability, and smoothness. Algorithms provide progression in terms of accuracy, range of movement, stability and smoothness, depending upon the performance of the patient.
The treatment will start with the installation of the patient and a warming up, followed by a first block of DeXtreme training. Then a short break is given followed by a short conventional therapy session. The content of the conventional therapy will involve active relaxation, focusing on stretching and (auto-)mobilisation. Afterwards, a second block of training with the DeXtreme follows, and it finishes with a cooling down. A therapist trained by the company will provide all assessment and training sessions. Training with the DeXtreme is additional to the conventional therapy the patient receives. Therefore, a diary of their conventional therapy sessions will be kept, and the content will be reviewed with the patient.
Advancements in upper limb motor function and activity will be evaluated through a triad of measurements including clinical and patient-reported outcomes, error-enhancement variables, and objective quantification of uni- and bimanual sensorimotor function by making use of the KINARM robotic manipulandum. These tests and questionnaires are administered on day 1 and day 7.
The aim of the study is to investigate whether patients with upper limb impairments in a chronic phase after stroke clinical and meaningful benefits from 5 hours DeXtreme training. In addition, it is examined whether improvements in the upper limb outcome is the result of restitution or compensation in the upper limb function.
In order to evaluate whether a randomized controlled trial is useful, the investigators will analyse the outcomes of our study twofold. (1) At group level, the investigators will calculate mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (based on whether data is normally distributed or not) and evaluate whether pre- to post-intervention scores for clinical, deXtreme and objective outcomes are significantly improved by means of Wilcoxon signed rank test (nonparametric), at a 0,05 significance level. Each p-value will be interpreted in a descriptive manner.
(2) At patient level, the investigators will evaluate how many patients (%) achieve a clinically significant improvement based on the therapy provided.
To see if the improvement might be explained by restitution or compensation, the association between the scores of the MAL-14 and the visually guided reaching task of the KINARM will be explored by Spearman correlations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DeXtreme (Error-enhacement)
Training (error-enhancement): 5 consecutive days, 1 hour per day
DeXtreme training (error-enhancement)
15-20 min DeXtreme - 15 min conventional therapy - 15-20 min DeXtreme
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DeXtreme training (error-enhancement)
15-20 min DeXtreme - 15 min conventional therapy - 15-20 min DeXtreme
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. First stroke, confirmed by neurologist based on clinical and/or imaging findings
3. Ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke, at least more than six months ago
4. Stroke affecting the dominant/non-dominant upper limb (unilateral weakness)
5. Less than 85 years old
6. Having a motor impairment yet no severe spasticity in the upper limb: be able to open and close the hand 5 times and be able to flex and extend the elbow 2 times but score less than 66 (maximum) on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Having apraxia (evaluated by the apraxia screen of TULIA)
3. Having neglect (evaluated by the Star Cancellation Test)
4. Cognitive deficit with a score under 24 out of 30 on the Mini-mental State Examination
5. Shoulder pain (yes/no)
6. Providing no informed consent
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
KU Leuven
OTHER
Bioxtreme Ltd.
UNKNOWN
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Geert Verheyden
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
KU Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim RK, Kang N. Bimanual Coordination Functions between Paretic and Nonparetic Arms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Feb;29(2):104544. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104544. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 May;90(5):498-506. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319954. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
Israely S, Leisman G, Carmeli E. Improvement in Hand Trajectory of Reaching Movements by Error-Augmentation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1070:71-84. doi: 10.1007/5584_2018_151.
Huang VS, Haith A, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models. Neuron. 2011 May 26;70(4):787-801. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.012.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
s65699
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.