Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-01
2022-12-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Topical Vitamin D on Immediate Dental Implants
NCT06806423
The Local Effect of Vitamin K2 on Bone Remodeling in Socket Preservation
NCT06707909
Evaluation of Dentin Graft and I-PRF With and Without Vitamin C for Post-extraction Socket Preservation
NCT06569264
Effect of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin Augmented With Vitamin C Compared to Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin Alone on Healing of Necrotic Mature Single Rooted Teeth With Chronic Peri-apical Periodontitis Following Regenerative Endodontics (A Randomized Controlled Trial)
NCT05585359
Tackling Dry Socket Via Laser Therapy in Smokers
NCT06481293
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study was conducted on a total number of 90 female patients seeking extraction of a single tooth in the lower posterior region, selected from those attending the outpatient clinic of the oral and maxillofacial surgery department in the faculty of dentistry, Ain Shams University and Misr University for Science \& Technology, Egypt as divided randomly into 45 patients received vitamin E inside the socket after extraction (study group) and 45 patients didn't receive vitamin E after extraction (control group).
II. Sample Size Calculation:
In the prior assessment of the article by Haraji et al. (Effects of Intra-alveolar Placement of 0.2% Chlorhexidine Bioadhesive Gel on Dry Socket Incidence and Postsurgical Pain: A Double-Blind Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial) and setting alpha at 0.05 and Beta at 0.8 the data showed that the minimum number of patients to be included in each group was 18.
III. Blinding\\Masking:
Blinding of biostatistician was achieved while blinding of participants and operator wasn't possible as the operator is the outcome assessor.
IV. Research Ethics Approval:
The research was reviewed by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University.
V. Preoperative Assessment:
1. Patient Evaluation:
Each female has been evaluated for the following:
A. Medical History:
Full medical history was taken to exclude any patient according to the exclusion criteria.
B. Dental History:
Full dental history was taken including the history of previous incidences of dry socket.
C. Chief Complaint All patients were asked about the current dental chief complaint to exclude any patient who needed dental treatment other than extraction.
2. Clinical Examination:
A. Extra-Oral Examination:
All patients were examined by the operator including facial appearance and facial bone.
B. Intra-Oral Examination:
This examination included:
* General examination of oral health, checking the teeth adjacent to the extracted tooth and oral hard and soft tissues.
* Examination of extracted tooth including tenderness and mobility tests.
3. Radiographic Assessment Radiographic assessment was done using a periapical radiograph to examine the surrounding bone, exclude any pathological lesion, and detect the location of the inferior alveolar canal, especially during extraction of lower third molars.
4. Photography:
Intra-oral Photographs were taken before establishing the surgical procedure. Figure (1)
5. Surgical Preparation:
A. Anesthetic Protocol:
The extraction procedures were done under local anesthesia using 4% articaine solution with adrenaline 1:100,000, as 1.2 ml for Inferior Alveolar Nerve block (IANB), 0.3 ml for lingual nerve block and 0.3 ml for long buccal nerve block on the side of the extraction.
B. Preparation of Gel Foam and Vitamin E:
A piece of gel foam was cut into 1 X1 cm2.
C. Extraction Procedure:
* All extractions were performed by the same surgeon using standard English-Style Vertical Hinge forceps in a standardized buccolingual technique for socket expansion.
* The extraction procedures were done simply using forceps or elevators without raising mucoperiosteal flaps or anything that make the procedure surgical. Figure (2)
D. Packing of the Gel Foam:
The prepared gel foam was packed inside the socket to be covering the walls of the socket and not be oversized.
E. Suture with Figure 8:
A horizontal Figure 8 suture was applied for stabilization. Figure (3)
F. Post-Operative Instructions:
* Keep biting on the gauze for 1 hour.
* Avoid eating or drinking hot stuff on the first post-extraction day.
* Soft and cold food can be consumed after 2 hours on the other side.
* Avoid rinsing for the next 24 hours after extraction.
* Rinsing the mouth with warm saline 3 times daily on the 2nd day and continued for 5 days.
* Avoid smoking.
* Rest and avoid strenuous activities for the remainder of the day.
* Patients were given a prescription for Diclofenac Potassium to be used twice daily for three days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
study group
patients received vitamin E inside the socket after extraction (study group)
Vitamin E application
patients received vitamin E inside the socket after extraction
control
patients didn't receive vitamin E after extraction (control group).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vitamin E application
patients received vitamin E inside the socket after extraction
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with single tooth in the lower posterior region need simple extraction.
* Compliance with all requirements in the study and signing the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Vulnerable groups (children, pregnant women, elderly people, malnourished people, prisoners, migrants, and refugees).
* Patients with systemic disease affecting bone healing (osteoporosis, Rickets, and osteomalacia).
* Chronic Patients on medications known to affect the periodontal status (calcium antagonists, anticonvulsive, immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory medications).
* Patients with a history of bisphosphonate use.
* Pathologic lesions in the site of extraction.
* Lactating mothers.
* Smoking patients.
* Patients currently on radiotherapy and or chemotherapy treatment.
30 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
mohamed diaa
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ain shams
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ain shams University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Blum IR. Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Jun;31(3):309-17. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0263.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
7132023asu
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.