Non-ventilated Prone Positioning in the COVID-19 Population
NCT ID: NCT05957588
Last Updated: 2023-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
216 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-01
2022-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pronation in COVID-19 Patients Undergoing Non Invasive Respiratory Support
NCT04649658
Prone Positioning in Awake Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Hospitalization
NCT04368000
Awake Prone Positioning for COVID-19 Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure
NCT05866289
Awake Prone Position for Early Hypoxemia in COVID-19
NCT04344587
Prone Positioning in Non-intubated Patients With COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT04477655
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial with a sample size of 216 patients, with 36 self-proners, 104 standard of care patients, and 69 patients refused to participate in the intervention. The researchers also studied rates of attrition for self-proning. Patients were randomized using a randomization table per hospital admission. The researchers consented patients who were oriented, and able to self-prone safely without assistance on an acute care telemetry monitored unit. Patients were self-documenting their position per hour, and the researchers were using the electronic health record to collect vital signs and presence of pressure injuries. All data was entered in the secure REDCap database.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Proning group
COVID-19 hypoxemic patients that receive standard of care AND participate in self-proning following the research protocol.
Proning group
Patients were educated about self-proning, and instructed to self-prone every 2 hours. The patient documented their position on the checklists every 2 hours.
Upon initiation of the initial proning, the patient was monitored by the research team RN for adverse effects for 15 minutes (such as inability to tolerate position or signs of respiratory distress).
If the patient tolerated the proning well, the RN entered the patient's oxygen saturation into the EMR, and documented the initial position (prone or supine) on the checklist. O2 saturation was documented at least every 4 hours per unit protocol.
The checklists were placed in a binder at the nurses' station at the end of each shift and collected daily by a member of the research team.
This intervention for each proned patient continued until either of the following occurred: ei the patient was discharged to a lower level of care or 14 days had passed.
Control group
COVID-19 hypoxemic patients that receive standard of care.
Control group
A retrospective chart review was completed by the research team to ascertain length of stay, oxygenation, and pressure injuries for the control group on the acute care, telemetry monitored unit.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Proning group
Patients were educated about self-proning, and instructed to self-prone every 2 hours. The patient documented their position on the checklists every 2 hours.
Upon initiation of the initial proning, the patient was monitored by the research team RN for adverse effects for 15 minutes (such as inability to tolerate position or signs of respiratory distress).
If the patient tolerated the proning well, the RN entered the patient's oxygen saturation into the EMR, and documented the initial position (prone or supine) on the checklist. O2 saturation was documented at least every 4 hours per unit protocol.
The checklists were placed in a binder at the nurses' station at the end of each shift and collected daily by a member of the research team.
This intervention for each proned patient continued until either of the following occurred: ei the patient was discharged to a lower level of care or 14 days had passed.
Control group
A retrospective chart review was completed by the research team to ascertain length of stay, oxygenation, and pressure injuries for the control group on the acute care, telemetry monitored unit.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* conscious, oriented and independently mobile patients
* subjects were patients 18 years and older
Exclusion Criteria
* patients in ICU settings
* patients in acute respiratory distress
* patients in hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure below 90) or arrhythmia
* patients with altered mental status
* patients with unstable spine/thoracic injury
* patients with recent abdominal surgery
* patients with significant pressure ulcers (above stage 1)
* pregnant patients past the 2nd trimester
* patients that have concerning neurological issues (such as seizures)
* Patients that are unable to change positions independently
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marie Hodges, BSN, RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alser O, Mokhtari A, Naar L, Langeveld K, Breen KA, El Moheb M, Kapoen C, Gaitanidis A, Christensen MA, Maurer LR, Mashbari H, Bankhead-Kendall B, Parks J, Fawley J, Saillant N, Mendoza A, Paranjape C, Fagenholz P, King D, Lee J, Farhat MR, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Multisystem outcomes and predictors of mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: Demographics and disease acuity matter more than comorbidities or treatment modalities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 May 1;90(5):880-890. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003085.
Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early Self-Proning in Awake, Non-intubated Patients in the Emergency Department: A Single ED's Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 May;27(5):375-378. doi: 10.1111/acem.13994.
Cardona S, Downing J, Alfalasi R, Bzhilyanskaya V, Milzman D, Rehan M, Schwartz B, Yardi I, Yazdanpanah F, Tran QK. Intubation rate of patients with hypoxia due to COVID-19 treated with awake proning: A meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.058. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
Ding L, Wang L, Ma W, He H. Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2020 Jan 30;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2738-5.
Dubosh NM, Wong ML, Grossestreuer AV, Loo YK, Sanchez LD, Chiu D, Leventhal EL, Ilg A, Donnino MW. Early, awake proning in emergency department patients with COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:640-645. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.074. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
Ehrmann S, Li J, Ibarra-Estrada M, Perez Y, Pavlov I, McNicholas B, Roca O, Mirza S, Vines D, Garcia-Salcido R, Aguirre-Avalos G, Trump MW, Nay MA, Dellamonica J, Nseir S, Mogri I, Cosgrave D, Jayaraman D, Masclans JR, Laffey JG, Tavernier E; Awake Prone Positioning Meta-Trial Group. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Dec;9(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00356-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
Garg S, Patel K, Pham H, Whitaker M, O'Halloran A, Milucky J, Anglin O, Kirley PD, Reingold A, Kawasaki B, Herlihy R, Yousey-Hindes K, Maslar A, Anderson EJ, Openo KP, Weigel A, Teno K, Ryan PA, Monroe ML, Reeg L, Kim S, Como-Sabetti K, Bye E, Shrum Davis S, Eisenberg N, Muse A, Barney G, Bennett NM, Felsen CB, Billing L, Shiltz J, Sutton M, Abdullah N, Talbot HK, Schaffner W, Hill M, Chatelain R, Wortham J, Taylor C, Hall A, Fry AM, Kim L, Havers FP. Clinical Trends Among U.S. Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19, March to December 2020 : A Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Oct;174(10):1409-1419. doi: 10.7326/M21-1991. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
Kallet RH. A Comprehensive Review of Prone Position in ARDS. Respir Care. 2015 Nov;60(11):1660-87. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04271.
McNicholas B, Cosgrave D, Giacomini C, Brennan A, Laffey JG. Prone positioning in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: just do it? Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):440-443. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 9. No abstract available.
Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Adhikari NKJ, Hodgson CL, Wunsch H, Meade MO, Uleryk E, Mancebo J, Pesenti A, Ranieri VM, Fan E. Prone Position for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S280-S288. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-343OT.
Qian ET, Gatto CL, Amusina O, Dear ML, Hiser W, Buie R, Kripalani S, Harrell FE Jr, Freundlich RE, Gao Y, Gong W, Hennessy C, Grooms J, Mattingly M, Bellam SK, Burke J, Zakaria A, Vasilevskis EE, Billings FT 4th, Pulley JM, Bernard GR, Lindsell CJ, Rice TW; Vanderbilt Learning Healthcare System Platform Investigators. Assessment of Awake Prone Positioning in Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jun 1;182(6):612-621. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1070.
Rees EM, Nightingale ES, Jafari Y, Waterlow NR, Clifford S, B Pearson CA, Group CW, Jombart T, Procter SR, Knight GM. COVID-19 length of hospital stay: a systematic review and data synthesis. BMC Med. 2020 Sep 3;18(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01726-3.
Taylor SP, Bundy H, Smith WM, Skavroneck S, Taylor B, Kowalkowski MA. Awake Prone Positioning Strategy for Nonintubated Hypoxic Patients with COVID-19: A Pilot Trial with Embedded Implementation Evaluation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Aug;18(8):1360-1368. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1164OC.
Shearer SC, Parsa KM, Newark A, Peesay T, Walsh AR, Fernandez S, Gao WZ, Pierce ML. Facial Pressure Injuries from Prone Positioning in the COVID-19 Era. Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):E2139-E2142. doi: 10.1002/lary.29374. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected: Interim guidance. World Health Organization, 1-10. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/10665-332299
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
This URL and identifier are used internally by Common Spirit Health IRB. The link is IRBNET.org and registration thru CSH is required. The link provides access to a digital document repository including the consent form.
View DocumentDocument Type: Study Protocol
This URL and identifier are used internally by Common Spirit Health IRB. The link is IRBNET.org and registration thru CSH is required. The link provides access to a digital document repository including the protocol document.
View DocumentRelated Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Enterprise login to find out more about research and innovation
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BaylorSt.Lukes
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.