Piperacillin/Tazobactam Versus ceftriAxone and Metronidazole for Children With Perforated Appendicitis (ALPACA)
NCT ID: NCT05943223
Last Updated: 2023-07-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-31
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intravenous Versus Intravenous/Oral Antibiotics for Perforated Appendicitis
NCT00462020
Non-operative Management for Appendicitis in Children
NCT02795793
Pilot Trial of Antibiotics Versus Surgery for Treating Acute Appendicitis
NCT02447224
Antibiotic Treatment Alone for Acute Simple Appendicitis in Children
NCT01356641
Acute Appendicitis and Microbiota - Etiology of Appendicitis and Antibiotic Therapy Effects
NCT03257423
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Children with perforated appendicitis were previously treated with post-operative ampicillin, gentamicin, and metronidazole (also known as "triple therapy"). In 2008, a randomized controlled trial showed that triple therapy is non-inferior to ceftriaxone and metronidazole (CM) in terms of intra-abdominal abscess formation and wound infection. CM is also less expensive and has a simplified dosing regimen. As such, post-operative CM became the standard of care for perforated appendicitis at most children's hospitals.
In 2021, an open-label RCT suggested that piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) is more effective than CM for children with perforated appendicitis. Patients randomized to PT had a reduced rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation compared to those treated with CM (odds ratio (OR) 4.80, p=0.002). This trial was not blinded and there was no allocation concealment. In contrast, a multicenter, observational study reported no difference in the rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation among patients treated with PT compared to CM. The conflicting results of these two studies add further uncertainty regarding the choice of antibiotics for these patients.
Another factor that should be considered regarding the use of PT versus CM in children with perforated appendicitis is antibiotic stewardship. PT is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with increased effectiveness against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and resistant Escherichia coli. As a result, this medication is often reserved for patients with confirmed Pseudomonas infection, oncology patients with febrile neutropenia, or those who are critically ill and admitted to the intensive care unit.
The current study is an internal pilot for a multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. The purpose of the multicenter trial is to determine whether post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone and metronidazole for children treated with laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. We plan to conduct an internal pilot study to determine whether a blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial is feasible.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Piperacillin/tazobactam
Piperacillin/tazobactam
Post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam 100 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 4.5 g IV q8h)
Normal saline
Post-operative normal saline 50 mL once daily
Ceftriaxone and metronidazole
CefTRIAXone Injection
Post-operative ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg IV once daily (to a maximum of 2 g IV once daily)
Metronidazole Injection
Post-operative metronidazole 10 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 500 mg IV q8h)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Piperacillin/tazobactam
Post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam 100 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 4.5 g IV q8h)
Normal saline
Post-operative normal saline 50 mL once daily
CefTRIAXone Injection
Post-operative ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg IV once daily (to a maximum of 2 g IV once daily)
Metronidazole Injection
Post-operative metronidazole 10 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 500 mg IV q8h)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Perforated appendicitis confirmed intra-operatively (i.e., visible hole in appendix, fecalith found in peritoneal cavity, intra-abdominal abscess, and/or purulent fluid in peritoneal cavity)
Exclusion Criteria
* Interval laparoscopic appendectomy
* Conversion to open procedure
* Non-perforated appendicitis
* Confirmed or suspected allergy to penicillins or cephalosporins
* Renal impairment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Livingston
Pediatric Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael H Livingston, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster Children's Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
St Peter SD, Snyder CL. Operative management of appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016 Aug;25(4):208-11. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 10.
Linnaus ME, Ostlie DJ. Complications in common general pediatric surgery procedures. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016 Dec;25(6):404-411. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
St Peter SD, Tsao K, Spilde TL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Sharp SW, Murphy JP, Snyder CL, Sharp RJ, Andrews WS, Ostlie DJ. Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jun;43(6):981-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.018.
Lee J, Garvey EM, Bundrant N, Hargis-Villanueva A, Kang P, Osuchukwu O, Dekonenko C, Svetanoff WJ, St Peter SD, Padilla B, Ostlie D. IMPPACT (Intravenous Monotherapy for Postoperative Perforated Appendicitis in Children Trial): Randomized Clinical Trial of Monotherapy Versus Multi-drug Antibiotic Therapy. Ann Surg. 2021 Sep 1;274(3):406-410. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005006.
Kashtan MA, Graham DA, Melvin P, Hills-Dunlap JL, Anandalwar SP, Rangel SJ. Ceftriaxone with Metronidazole versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the management of complicated appendicitis in children: Results from a multicenter pediatric NSQIP analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Oct;57(10):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
Gerber JS, Jackson MA, Tamma PD, Zaoutis TE; COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY. Antibiotic Stewardship in Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1):e2020040295. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-040295.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
McmasterCH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.