Piperacillin/Tazobactam Versus ceftriAxone and Metronidazole for Children With Perforated Appendicitis (ALPACA)

NCT ID: NCT05943223

Last Updated: 2023-07-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is an internal pilot for a multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. The purpose of the multicenter trial is to determine whether post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone and metronidazole for children treated with laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. We plan to conduct an internal pilot study to determine whether a blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial is feasible.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency surgery in children. The management of this condition is typically an urgent laparoscopic appendectomy under general anesthesia. If the appendix is found to be perforated at the time of surgery, then patients need to stay in hospital for intravenous antibiotics. Patients who do not respond to antibiotic therapy experience prolonged length of stay, need for additional procedures (such as percutaneous drain insertion), or other complications. This represents significant morbidity for patients and their families.

Children with perforated appendicitis were previously treated with post-operative ampicillin, gentamicin, and metronidazole (also known as "triple therapy"). In 2008, a randomized controlled trial showed that triple therapy is non-inferior to ceftriaxone and metronidazole (CM) in terms of intra-abdominal abscess formation and wound infection. CM is also less expensive and has a simplified dosing regimen. As such, post-operative CM became the standard of care for perforated appendicitis at most children's hospitals.

In 2021, an open-label RCT suggested that piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) is more effective than CM for children with perforated appendicitis. Patients randomized to PT had a reduced rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation compared to those treated with CM (odds ratio (OR) 4.80, p=0.002). This trial was not blinded and there was no allocation concealment. In contrast, a multicenter, observational study reported no difference in the rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation among patients treated with PT compared to CM. The conflicting results of these two studies add further uncertainty regarding the choice of antibiotics for these patients.

Another factor that should be considered regarding the use of PT versus CM in children with perforated appendicitis is antibiotic stewardship. PT is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with increased effectiveness against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and resistant Escherichia coli. As a result, this medication is often reserved for patients with confirmed Pseudomonas infection, oncology patients with febrile neutropenia, or those who are critically ill and admitted to the intensive care unit.

The current study is an internal pilot for a multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. The purpose of the multicenter trial is to determine whether post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone and metronidazole for children treated with laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. We plan to conduct an internal pilot study to determine whether a blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial is feasible.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendicitis Perforated

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Internal pilot study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Piperacillin/tazobactam

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Piperacillin/tazobactam

Intervention Type DRUG

Post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam 100 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 4.5 g IV q8h)

Normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Post-operative normal saline 50 mL once daily

Ceftriaxone and metronidazole

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CefTRIAXone Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Post-operative ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg IV once daily (to a maximum of 2 g IV once daily)

Metronidazole Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Post-operative metronidazole 10 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 500 mg IV q8h)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Piperacillin/tazobactam

Post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam 100 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 4.5 g IV q8h)

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline

Post-operative normal saline 50 mL once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

CefTRIAXone Injection

Post-operative ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg IV once daily (to a maximum of 2 g IV once daily)

Intervention Type DRUG

Metronidazole Injection

Post-operative metronidazole 10 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 500 mg IV q8h)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Laparoscopic appendectomy
* Perforated appendicitis confirmed intra-operatively (i.e., visible hole in appendix, fecalith found in peritoneal cavity, intra-abdominal abscess, and/or purulent fluid in peritoneal cavity)

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-operative treatment (e.g., due to abscess)
* Interval laparoscopic appendectomy
* Conversion to open procedure
* Non-perforated appendicitis
* Confirmed or suspected allergy to penicillins or cephalosporins
* Renal impairment
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McMaster Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael Livingston

Pediatric Surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael H Livingston, MD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster Children's Hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Daniel Briatico, MSc

Role: CONTACT

9055212100 ext. 75231

Michael H Livingston, MD, MSc

Role: CONTACT

9055212100 ext. 75231

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

St Peter SD, Snyder CL. Operative management of appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016 Aug;25(4):208-11. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27521710 (View on PubMed)

Linnaus ME, Ostlie DJ. Complications in common general pediatric surgery procedures. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016 Dec;25(6):404-411. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27989365 (View on PubMed)

St Peter SD, Tsao K, Spilde TL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Sharp SW, Murphy JP, Snyder CL, Sharp RJ, Andrews WS, Ostlie DJ. Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jun;43(6):981-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18558169 (View on PubMed)

Lee J, Garvey EM, Bundrant N, Hargis-Villanueva A, Kang P, Osuchukwu O, Dekonenko C, Svetanoff WJ, St Peter SD, Padilla B, Ostlie D. IMPPACT (Intravenous Monotherapy for Postoperative Perforated Appendicitis in Children Trial): Randomized Clinical Trial of Monotherapy Versus Multi-drug Antibiotic Therapy. Ann Surg. 2021 Sep 1;274(3):406-410. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34132703 (View on PubMed)

Kashtan MA, Graham DA, Melvin P, Hills-Dunlap JL, Anandalwar SP, Rangel SJ. Ceftriaxone with Metronidazole versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the management of complicated appendicitis in children: Results from a multicenter pediatric NSQIP analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Oct;57(10):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34876294 (View on PubMed)

Gerber JS, Jackson MA, Tamma PD, Zaoutis TE; COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY. Antibiotic Stewardship in Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1):e2020040295. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-040295.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33372120 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

McmasterCH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antibiotic Instillation in Appendicitis
NCT05470517 COMPLETED PHASE2