The Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) Trial

NCT ID: NCT02800785

Last Updated: 2023-05-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1552 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2021-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For the past 130 years, appendectomy has been the standard treatment for appendicitis. Recent studies from Europe have challenged the notion that surgery is the best option, showing that antibiotics alone can treat appendicitis without a need for appendectomy in as many as 3 out of 4 patients and without safety issues for up to one year of follow up. Despite these results, it remains to be determined if the antibiotic strategy is as good as an appendectomy for the outcomes that most patients care about. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)-funded Comparison of Outcomes of Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial will be the first American, and largest-ever randomized trial of the issue and its results should help surgeons and patients make more informed healthcare decisions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial aims to test, if from a patient's perspective, the antibiotics strategy is "just as good as" surgery. The investigators believe that patients, clinicians, and the people who pay for healthcare (both patients and insurers) will find the antibiotics approach acceptable if 1) it results in high rates of treatment success, 2) does not increase complications, and 3) provides an equivalent or better patient experience. A large-scale non-inferiority trial is expected to result in a change in the management of one of the most common human illnesses. If non-inferiority is demonstrated (or superiority of the antibiotics approach identified), that finding will improve patient choice and should support a shift to the less invasive approach. If non-inferiority is not established, results may help to delineate the trade-offs between the two treatment approaches and inform decision-making.

The observation that patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) can be cured with antibiotics-alone has a scientific rationale. Traditionally, appendicitis was thought to result from a blockage of the appendix and that, if left untreated, inevitably led to a perforation. Contrary to this physiologic model, Carr demonstrated that obstruction of the appendix is an unlikely primary cause in the majority of patients and that most are caused by an enteric infection. A recent randomized trial found an increased rate of appendectomy with early use of computed tomography (CT) imaging and diagnostic laparoscopy, but case reports of appendicitis remission documented by serial CT all suggest that leaving the appendix in place does not inexorably lead to clinical compromise. A common concern of clinicians when considering treating AUA with antibiotics is that not removing the appendix may lead to perforation and complications from complicated appendicitis. Evidence suggests, however, that perforated appendicitis is a pre-hospital event and that non-perforated appendicitis is a "different" disease. This theory is supported by a general lack of relation between a delay in surgery of up to 24-36 hours and perforation rates. Most recently, Fusobacterium sp., a genus of enteric Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria, rather than an obstructive stone, was found to be correlated with the presence of appendicitis and the degree of inflammation. What remains to be determined is whether certain bacterial colonies or features of individual immune response are most associated with progression of appendicitis without appendectomy and whether successful outcomes for people undergoing antibiotics can be predicted based on the patient's characteristics.

An additional rationale for this study is to address limitations of prior trials. To avoid misclassification problems of other trials, all patients will undergo standard radiographic imaging including CT, ultrasound (US), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with an appendicolith will be included in the trial but considered a unique subgroup and will be evaluated as part of a pre-specified analysis (potentially excluding them from future recruitment if an early analysis demonstrates futility related to the primary antibiotic approach not being successful). To reflect usual and emerging techniques in treatment, the study includes both types of appendectomy (open and laparoscopic) and a broad range of antibiotic strategies including the option for an "all outpatient" treatment schedule with once daily dosing of longer-acting agents. Patients in the antibiotics arm will be given a minimum of 24 hours of intravenous (IV) antibiotics (using any appropriate dosing schedule and based on the patient's ability to tolerate oral medication), followed by oral antibiotics for a total of 10 days of antibiotic treatment). Discharge from the hospital or emergency department (ED) or a change in treatment arms will be guided by clinical targets and reasons for change in treatment arms will be assessed. Patients will be followed for up to two years to assess for longer-term complications, eventual appendectomy (performed anywhere), quality of life (QoL), gastrointestinal symptoms, and decisional regret. To quantify selection bias and to promote generalizability, all patients approached for the study and those who refuse randomization will be characterized at baseline. A parallel cohort of patients who refuse randomization (250 who initiate the antibiotics strategy and 250 who select the appendectomy strategy) will be surveyed for two years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendicitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Antibiotics Therapy Arm

Patients in the antibiotics (abx) arm will receive a total of 10 days of abx, with a minimum of 24 hours using an IV abx formulation (administered in q8, q12, or q24 hour regimens with or without concurrent oral abx) followed by oral abx for the remainder of the 10 days. Patients will be offered a treatment regimen of abx based on guidelines published jointly by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Disease Society of America. Any of the IV abx options (Single antibiotic-Cefoxitin, Ertapenem, Moxifloxicin, Tigecycline, Ticarcillin-Clavulanic Acid or Dual antibiotics-Metronidazole plus one of the following-Cefazolin, Cefuroxime, Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin) will be considered acceptable. After IV abx, a regimen of oral abx will be continued for a total treatment length of 10 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cefoxitin, Ertapenem, Moxifloxacin, Tigecycline, Ticarcillin-Clavulanic Acid; Metronidazole plus Cefazolin, Cefuroxime, Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, or Levofloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will be offered a treatment regimen of antibiotics based on guidelines published jointly by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Disease Society of America. After IV antibiotics are administered for a period of at least 24 hours, a regimen of oral antibiotics will be continued for a total treatment length of 10 days. Preferred oral antibiotic regimens include Moxifloxacin alone, and combinations such as Metronidazole or Clindamycin, for anaerobic bacteria coverage, plus Ciprofloxacin or Levofloxacin, or an oral Cephalosporin for aerobic Gram-negative bacteria coverage.

Appendectomy Arm

Patients in the appendectomy arm will have an appendectomy performed by an open or laparoscopic approach, depending on patient and surgeon preference. Prior to their operation, patients in this arm will receive one dose of antibiotics per currently accepted standards when appendicitis diagnosis is confirmed. Patients may also receive preoperative antibiotics per hospital standards for surgical infection prevention bundle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Appendectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Appendectomy will be performed by an open or laparoscopic approach, depending on patient and surgeon preference.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cefoxitin, Ertapenem, Moxifloxacin, Tigecycline, Ticarcillin-Clavulanic Acid; Metronidazole plus Cefazolin, Cefuroxime, Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, or Levofloxacin

Patients will be offered a treatment regimen of antibiotics based on guidelines published jointly by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Disease Society of America. After IV antibiotics are administered for a period of at least 24 hours, a regimen of oral antibiotics will be continued for a total treatment length of 10 days. Preferred oral antibiotic regimens include Moxifloxacin alone, and combinations such as Metronidazole or Clindamycin, for anaerobic bacteria coverage, plus Ciprofloxacin or Levofloxacin, or an oral Cephalosporin for aerobic Gram-negative bacteria coverage.

Intervention Type DRUG

Appendectomy

Appendectomy will be performed by an open or laparoscopic approach, depending on patient and surgeon preference.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult ≥18 years;
2. Clinical diagnosis of acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) established by clinical care team, supported by any of the following usual care radiological tests (computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)). AUA is defined by the usual signs, symptoms, and imaging finding of appendicitis without:

1. Diffuse peritonitis on clinical exam (i.e., rigid abdomen / four quadrant peritonitis);
2. Radiologic findings of :

i. Free air; ii. Walled off fluid collection concerning for an abscess; iii. Significant amounts of intra-abdominal fluid throughout abdomen (i.e., more than trace fluid); or iv. Extent of inflammation or adjacent organ involvement on radiologic imaging such that appendectomy is relatively contraindicated.
3. Ability to provide written or electronic informed consent in English or Spanish.

Exclusion Criteria

1. 1\. Unable or unwilling to return or be contacted for clinical follow-up visits and/or research surveys;
2. Currently incarcerated in a detention facility or in police custody (patients wearing a monitoring device can be enrolled) at baseline/screening;
3. Evidence of severe sepsis or septic shock (e.g., new presumed sepsis-related organ dysfunction, elevated lactate, and/or fluid unresponsive hypotension);
4. Conditions with altered immune response or at risk for bacterial seeding;
5. Immunodeficiency (e.g., absolute neutrophil count \<500/mm3, chronic immunosuppressive drugs, active chemotherapy or plans for chemotherapy in the following 30 days, or known acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) \[cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count \<200 or AIDS-defining illness within the last year\] assessed by patient history);
6. Uncompensated liver failure;
7. Taking medication to treat active inflammatory bowel disease (e.g., Crohn's, ulcerative colitis);
8. Malignancy, not in remission (ongoing chemotherapy patients excluded);
9. Pregnant or expectation of becoming pregnant in the 30 days following baseline/screening;
10. Expected concurrent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or treatments using indwelling venous catheters;
11. Recent (within 90 days) placement of surgical implant (e.g., pacemaker, joint prosthesis, mechanical valve);
12. Indwelling Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD);
13. Patients with another infection (e.g., pneumonia, urinary tract infection) that requires treatment with another antibiotic at baseline/screening;
14. Concurrent illness that would otherwise mandate hospitalization outside of appendicitis and associated symptoms at baseline/screening;
15. Imaging findings of any of the following:

1. Appendiceal soft-tissue mass;
2. Imaging features of mucocele or tumor (e.g., appendix measuring ≥ 15mm in diameter and no other CT evidence of appendicitis);
3. Concern for carcinomatosis on imaging; or
16. Severe allergy or reaction (e.g., immediate urticaria or anaphylaxis) to all of the proposed antibiotics;
17. Prior enrollment in the study or other investigational drug or vaccine while on study treatment;
18. Abdominal/pelvic surgery in the past month; or
19. More than seven hours have transpired since the patient received the first parenteral dose of antibiotics.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Flum

Professor, Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David R Flum, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Washington

David A Talan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Los Angeles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Olive View-UCLA Medical Center

Sylmar, California, United States

Site Status

Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Denver

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Maine Medical Center

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

Boston Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Michigan Medicine- University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

New York University - Bellevue Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York University - Tisch Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Lyndon B Johnson- Harris Health

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Providence Regional Medical Center Everett

Everett, Washington, United States

Site Status

Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Virginia Mason University Village Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Swedish Medical Center- First Hill

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madigan Army Medical Center

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

CODA Collaborative; Flum DR, Davidson GH, Monsell SE, Shapiro NI, Odom SR, Sanchez SE, Drake FT, Fischkoff K, Johnson J, Patton JH, Evans H, Cuschieri J, Sabbatini AK, Faine BA, Skeete DA, Liang MK, Sohn V, McGrane K, Kutcher ME, Chung B, Carter DW, Ayoung-Chee P, Chiang W, Rushing A, Steinberg S, Foster CS, Schaetzel SM, Price TP, Mandell KA, Ferrigno L, Salzberg M, DeUgarte DA, Kaji AH, Moran GJ, Saltzman D, Alam HB, Park PK, Kao LS, Thompson CM, Self WH, Yu JT, Wiebusch A, Winchell RJ, Clark S, Krishnadasan A, Fannon E, Lavallee DC, Comstock BA, Bizzell B, Heagerty PJ, Kessler LG, Talan DA. A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1907-1919. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2014320. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33017106 (View on PubMed)

Serrano E, Voldal EC, Machado-Aranda D, DeUgarte DA, Kao L, Drake T, Winchell R, Cuschieri J, Krishnadasan A, Talan DA, Siparsky N, Ayoung-Chee P, Self WH, McGonagill P, Mandell KA, Liang MK, Dodwad SJ, Thompson CM, Padilla RM, Fleischman R, Price TP, Jones A, Bernardi K, Garcia L, Evans HL, Sanchez SE, Odom S, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Lawrence SO, Monsell SE, Fannon EEC, Kessler LG, Flum DR, Davidson GH; Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative. Trial Participation and Outcomes Among English-Speaking and Spanish-Speaking Patients With Appendicitis Randomized to Antibiotics: A Secondary Analysis of the CODA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2023 Sep 1;158(9):901-908. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2277.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37379001 (View on PubMed)

Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative; Zhang IY, Voldal EC, Davidson GH, Liao JM, Thompson CM, Self WH, Kao LS, Cherry-Bukowiec J, Raghavendran K, Kaji AH, DeUgarte DA, Gonzalez E, Mandell KA, Ohe K, Siparsky N, Price TP, Evans DC, Victory J, Chiang W, Jones A, Kutcher ME, Ciomperlik H, Liang MK, Evans HL, Faine BA, Neufeld M, Sanchez SE, Krishnadasan A, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Lawrence SO, Monsell SE, Fannon EEC, Kessler LG, Talan DA, Flum DR. Association of Patient Belief About Success of Antibiotics for Appendicitis and Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of the CODA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2022 Dec 1;157(12):1080-1087. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4765.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36197656 (View on PubMed)

Thompson CM, Voldal EC, Davidson GH, Sanchez SE, Ayoung-Chee P, Victory J, Guiden M, Bizzell B, Glaser J, Hults C, Price TP, Siparsky N, Ohe K, Mandell KA, DeUgarte DA, Kaji AH, Uribe L, Kao LS, Mueck KM, Farjah F, Self WH, Clark S, Drake FT, Fischkoff K, Minko E, Cuschieri J, Faine B, Skeete DA, Dhanani N, Liang MK, Krishnadasan A, Talan DA, Fannon E, Kessler LG, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Monsell SE, Lawrence SO, Flum DR, Lavallee DC; Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative. Perception of Treatment Success and Impact on Function with Antibiotics or Appendectomy for Appendicitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial with an Observational Cohort. Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):886-893. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005458. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35815898 (View on PubMed)

Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative; Talan DA, Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Monsell SE, Faine BA, Uribe L, Kaji AH, DeUgarte DA, Self WH, Shapiro NI, Cuschieri J, Glaser J, Park PK, Price TP, Siparsky N, Sanchez SE, Machado-Aranda DA, Victory J, Ayoung-Chee P, Chiang W, Corsa J, Evans HL, Ferrigno L, Garcia L, Hatch Q, Horton MD, Johnson J, Jones A, Kao LS, Kelly A, Kim D, Kutcher ME, Liang MK, Maghami N, McGrane K, Minko E, Mohr C, Neufeld M, Patton JH, Rog C, Rushing A, Sabbatini AK, Salzberg M, Thompson CM, Tichter A, Wisler J, Bizzell B, Fannon E, Lawrence SO, Voldal EC, Lavallee DC, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Davidson GH, Flum DR, Kessler LG. Analysis of Outcomes Associated With Outpatient Management of Nonoperatively Treated Patients With Appendicitis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220039. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20039.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35796152 (View on PubMed)

Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative; Davidson GH, Monsell SE, Evans H, Voldal EC, Fannon E, Lawrence SO, Krishnadasan A, Talan DA, Bizzell B, Heagerty PJ, Comstock BA, Lavallee DC, Villegas C, Winchell R, Thompson CM, Self WH, Kao LS, Dodwad SJ, Sabbatini AK, Droullard D, Machado-Aranda D, Gibbons MM, Kaji AH, DeUgarte DA, Ferrigno L, Salzberg M, Mandell KA, Siparsky N, Price TP, Raman A, Corsa J, Wisler J, Ayoung-Chee P, Victory J, Jones A, Kutcher M, McGrane K, Holihan J, Liang MK, Cuschieri J, Johnson J, Fischkoff K, Drake FT, Sanchez SE, Odom SR, Kessler LG, Flum DR. Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis. JAMA Surg. 2022 Jul 1;157(7):598-608. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1554.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35612859 (View on PubMed)

Davidson GH, Flum DR, Talan DA, Kessler LG, Lavallee DC, Bizzell BJ, Farjah F, Stewart SD, Krishnadasan A, Carney EE, Wolff EM, Comstock BA, Monsell SE, Heagerty PJ, Ehlers AP, DeUgarte DA, Kaji AH, Evans HL, Yu JT, Mandell KA, Doten IC, Clive KS, McGrane KM, Tudor BC, Foster CS, Saltzman DJ, Thirlby RC, Lange EO, Sabbatini AK, Moran GJ. Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial: a protocol for the pragmatic randomised study of appendicitis treatment. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e016117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016117.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29146633 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00001155

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antibiotic Instillation in Appendicitis
NCT05470517 COMPLETED PHASE2