Motivational Interviewing for Patients With Acute Psychosis

NCT ID: NCT05911529

Last Updated: 2024-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-15

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Psychotic disorders are associated with high levels of distress, limitations in quality of life, and a high risk of chronification for those affected. The treatment guidelines recommend combining the pharmacological treatment with psychotherapeutic methods, starting already in the acute phase. At the same time, there is little research evidence on which mechanisms of psychotherapy are most effective and best feasible for the acute setting. Therefore, the aim is to run a pilot study to test specific psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with psychosis on acute psychiatric wards.

The method of "Motivational Interviewing" is a well-known and established interviewing technique, which originally comes from the treatment of addictive disorders. In this study, it is used to strengthen the therapeutic alliance between patient and practitioner already in the acute phase of the disease, to increase adherence, and thus to achieve the overall goal of better integrating patients with pronounced positive symptoms into treatment. This appears to be extremely important, as non-adherence represents one of the greatest risks for chronification of the disease. The intervention will subsequently be evaluated in comparison to "treatment as usual".

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Psychotic disorders are among the top ten causes of long-term disability and have a high chronicity potential and a high risk of invalidity. One-fifth of all patients with schizophrenia suffer from chronic symptoms and impairments, and the disease is associated with low long-term work performance, a high degree of all mental health care resources and high socioeconomic costs. These findings demonstrate the importance of sufficient treatment for psychotic disorders and, most importantly, point to a need for research so that more effective treatments can be developed in the future.

In the recent decade, various psychotherapeutic programs with cognitive-behavioral background have been developed for patients with psychosis, and their efficacy has been investigated. Meta-analyses have shown superiority of cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis over standard treatment, both in combination with antipsychotic medication and without. Many of the psychological approaches have focused primarily on treating the deficits associated with psychosis, as for example cognitive remediation or social skills training. However, these methods are not feasible in the acute setting and there are only a few psychotherapeutic instruments that can be used within a short period of time for inpatient treatment.

The guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia recommend a combination of antipsychotic medication and psychosis-specific cognitive behavioral therapy. This includes all stages of the illness, also in the acute phase. The Swiss Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (SGPP) has stated in its treatment guidelines for schizophrenia that "our group recommends a structured psychotherapeutic approach even in the acute phase of the disease. The best evidence currently exists for cognitive-behavioral approaches, \[…\]. In any case, the psychotherapeutic procedure must be adapted to the circumstances of the acute phase and there is an urgent need for research on how this can be arranged in the setting of an acute ward.". Despite this explicit recommendation, to our knowledge there have been no studies that have systematically investigated this in the acute setting and results of which could therefore inform future treatment recommendations. As proposed by the SGPP, the aim is to systematically test and evaluate psychotherapeutic interventions in the setting of an acute care unit in an initial pilot trial.

Therapeutic alliance during the acute phase of psychotic illness is one of the most pressing obstacles for successful long term recovery. In order for patients to accept much-needed medication and psychosocial therapy and not drop out prematurely, intrinsic motivation to adhere to therapy is crucial. Motivational Interviewing is a method, that has been developed and evaluated over the last three decades and that shows promising results, not only for patients with addiction but also for other patients who struggle with compliance and ambivalence towards treatment and change of behavior.

It is well known from clinical experience that patients are offered psychotherapy only late during the course of hospitalizations and not when it is highly needed - during the acute phase of their illness. Accordingly, there is a clear gap in the literature as to which interventions are particularly useful in this challenging yet crucial phase of the illness.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Psychosis Schizophrenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Motivational Interviewing Group

Patients will receive four sessions of Motivational Interviewing within two weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Motivational Interviewing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In our study intervention, patients should receive four session of motivational interviewing (MI). Throughout the MI sessions, interviewers use common MI techniques including open-ended questions, affirmations, reflections, summaries, asking permission, expressing empathy, supporting self-efficacy, etc. Interviewers are clinical psychologists who received MI training immediately prior to the study.

Control Group

Patients in the control group receive four sessions of supportive conversations within two weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Supportive conversations

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In the control intervention patients should also be given four sessions, in which no MI techniques take place. They will be carried out in the sense of supportive conversations (i. e. conver-sations that do not follow a specific psychotherapy concept).

Since we want to check whether the patients really benefit from the specific intervention and not from getting more speaking time, the patient in the control group will also be given four conver-sations. It is known that supportive conversations can have a certain effect on the well-being and recovery process of patients, as the therapeutic relationship, i.e. appreciation, attention and/or attention, is an important efficacy factor (e. g. Grawe, 1995).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Motivational Interviewing

In our study intervention, patients should receive four session of motivational interviewing (MI). Throughout the MI sessions, interviewers use common MI techniques including open-ended questions, affirmations, reflections, summaries, asking permission, expressing empathy, supporting self-efficacy, etc. Interviewers are clinical psychologists who received MI training immediately prior to the study.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Supportive conversations

In the control intervention patients should also be given four sessions, in which no MI techniques take place. They will be carried out in the sense of supportive conversations (i. e. conver-sations that do not follow a specific psychotherapy concept).

Since we want to check whether the patients really benefit from the specific intervention and not from getting more speaking time, the patient in the control group will also be given four conver-sations. It is known that supportive conversations can have a certain effect on the well-being and recovery process of patients, as the therapeutic relationship, i.e. appreciation, attention and/or attention, is an important efficacy factor (e. g. Grawe, 1995).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Informed consent as documented by signature
* Male and female patients from inpatient units of the Psychiatric University Hospital of Zurich
* ICD-10 diagnosis of psychosis (F2.x)
* Fluent in German and able to understand the instructions

Exclusion Criteria

* Organic schizophrenia-like disorder (ICD: F0.6)
* Drug or alcohol abuse during treatment
* Previous enrolment in the current study
* Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
* During study: Complete stop of taking antipsychotic medications
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rahel Horisberger

Clinical psychologist, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philipp Homan, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Zurich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McGuire-Snieckus R, McCabe R, Catty J, Hansson L, Priebe S. A new scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care: STAR. Psychol Med. 2007 Jan;37(1):85-95. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706009299. Epub 2006 Nov 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17094819 (View on PubMed)

Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3616518 (View on PubMed)

Byerly MJ, Nakonezny PA, Rush AJ. The Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) validated against electronic monitoring in assessing the antipsychotic medication adherence of outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.12.470. Epub 2008 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18255269 (View on PubMed)

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio causal and control beliefs. (pp. 35-37). NFER-NELSON.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Schulz, H., Nübling, R., & Rüddel, H. (1995). Entwicklung einer Kurzform eines Fragebogens zur Psychotherapiemotivation. Verhaltenstherapie, 5, 89-95.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Aghotor J, Pfueller U, Moritz S, Weisbrod M, Roesch-Ely D. Metacognitive training for patients with schizophrenia (MCT): feasibility and preliminary evidence for its efficacy. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;41(3):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20167306 (View on PubMed)

Bark N, Revheim N, Huq F, Khalderov V, Ganz ZW, Medalia A. The impact of cognitive remediation on psychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2003 Oct 1;63(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00374-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12957702 (View on PubMed)

Cavelti M, Homan P, Vauth R. The impact of thought disorder on therapeutic alliance and personal recovery in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: An exploratory study. Psychiatry Res. 2016 May 30;239:92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.070. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27137967 (View on PubMed)

Galderisi S, Kaiser S, Bitter I, Nordentoft M, Mucci A, Sabe M, Giordano GM, Nielsen MO, Glenthoj LB, Pezzella P, Falkai P, Dollfus S, Gaebel W. EPA guidance on treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 17;64(1):e21. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33726883 (View on PubMed)

Grawe, K. (1995). Grundriss einer Allgemeinen Psychotherapie. Psychotherapeut, 40, 130-145.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kahn RS, Sommer IE, Murray RM, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, Cannon TD, O'Donovan M, Correll CU, Kane JM, van Os J, Insel TR. Schizophrenia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 Nov 12;1:15067. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.67.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27189524 (View on PubMed)

Kaiser, S., Berger, G., Conus, P., Kawohl, W., Müller, T. J., Schimmelmann, B. G., Traber, R., Trächsel, N., Vauth, R., & Seifritz, E. (2016). SGPP Behandlungsempfehlungen Schizophrenie. Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kennedy JL, Altar CA, Taylor DL, Degtiar I, Hornberger JC. The social and economic burden of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic literature review. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Mar;29(2):63-76. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32836508e6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23995856 (View on PubMed)

Kuipers E, Yesufu-Udechuku A, Taylor C, Kendall T. Management of psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014 Feb 12;348:g1173. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1173. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24523363 (View on PubMed)

Lincoln, T. M., & Pedersen, A. (2019). An Overview of the Evidence for Psychological Interventions for Psychosis: Results From Meta-Analyses. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 1(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v1i1.31407

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Mehl, S., & Lincoln, T. (2014). Therapie-Tools Psychose. Beltz.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Morrison AP, Hutton P, Wardle M, Spencer H, Barratt S, Brabban A, Callcott P, Christodoulides T, Dudley R, French P, Lumley V, Tai SJ, Turkington D. Cognitive therapy for people with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis not taking antipsychotic medication: an exploratory trial. Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):1049-56. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001899. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21914252 (View on PubMed)

Morrison AP, Turkington D, Pyle M, Spencer H, Brabban A, Dunn G, Christodoulides T, Dudley R, Chapman N, Callcott P, Grace T, Lumley V, Drage L, Tully S, Irving K, Cummings A, Byrne R, Davies LM, Hutton P. Cognitive therapy for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders not taking antipsychotic drugs: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Apr 19;383(9926):1395-403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62246-1. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24508320 (View on PubMed)

Mueser KT, McGurk SR. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2004 Jun 19;363(9426):2063-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16458-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15207959 (View on PubMed)

Murray, C. J. L., & Lopez, A. D. (1996). The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2010). Schizophrenia: The NICE Guideline on Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Adults in Primary and Secondary Care. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG82FullGuideline.pdf

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Owen MJ, Sawa A, Mortensen PB. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2016 Jul 2;388(10039):86-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01121-6. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26777917 (View on PubMed)

Puig O, Penades R, Baeza I, De la Serna E, Sanchez-Gistau V, Bernardo M, Castro-Fornieles J. Cognitive remediation therapy in adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;53(8):859-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25062593 (View on PubMed)

Rabinowitz J, Levine SZ, Garibaldi G, Bugarski-Kirola D, Berardo CG, Kapur S. Negative symptoms have greater impact on functioning than positive symptoms in schizophrenia: analysis of CATIE data. Schizophr Res. 2012 May;137(1-3):147-50. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22316568 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MI for acute psychosis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.