Skills Group for Youth at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis

NCT ID: NCT05398120

Last Updated: 2025-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-26

Study Completion Date

2026-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is intended to test the feasibility of an integrated cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) skills group for adolescents and young adults at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis. The current study applies a skills group drawing from evidence-based practices (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT)) to those at CHR for psychosis. Up to 30 CHR individuals (starting with a minimum of 3 participants, N accounts for attrition as well), aged 13-18, already receiving clinical services within the HOPE team at University of Pittsburgh will be offered a weekly skills group. Data collected on feasibility and outcome measures will occur pre (within 1 month) -post (up to 4-5 months) and half-way (up to 2-3 months) through the intervention. Taken together, the aim of the proposed intervention is to provide novel insights regarding the utility of a newly developed intervention that integrates both CBT and DBT skills for those at CHR for psychosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of the current study is to integrate cognitive behavioral therapy and dialectical behavioral therapy skills and implement in a group format to a sample of individuals at risk for developing a psychotic disorder. These data have the potential to provide a foundation for intervention development in this area. The group will include weekly sessions for 90 minutes with up to 8 members in the group at a time. Each session will include mindfulness, homework review, and skill development. Each individual in the group will be asked to complete the group for 15-weeks. In the first section of the group, skills will be taught to manage and reduce stress. The second set of skills will include teaching individuals how to improve self-disturbances. The final section of the group will include helping participants improve social skills. Furthermore, parents will be asked to participate in a parent/guardian session 1x a month and will also be asked to also fill out a post-group surveys although this is not mandatory.

It is important to note that all hypotheses are exploratory given the feasibility nature of this study and the sample size. Even so, it is predicted, in an exploratory fashion, that this group will be feasible to implement and there will be improvements in symptoms and functioning.

Changes have been made starting Nov 2024 to the group given the feedback received: (1) Instead of 21-weeks, the group has been modified to to 15-weeks, (2) skills are consistent across stages, implementing only standard DBT skills (instead of radically-open DBT: this applies to stage 3 of the group where the goal is intended to improve social impairments), and (3) the number of outcome measures have been reduced and streamlined to follow the general clinic assessment battery to reduce participant burden.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Clinical High-Risk Psychological

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Participants already receiving services in the psychosis-risk clinic at the University of Pittsburgh will be asked to participate in the psychosis-risk skills group. Data collected on feasibility and outcome measures will occur pre (within 1 month) -post (up to 4-5 months) and half-way (up to 2-3 months) through the intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

There is one condition so masking is not relevant

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Skills Group

There will be one condition which is the group and participants will complete feasibility and outcome measures at baseline, at midpoint, and at the end of the group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Skills Group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Adolescents and young adults with a CHR syndrome ages 13-18 will complete feasibility and outcome measures while participating in a weekly skills group for 6 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Skills Group

Adolescents and young adults with a CHR syndrome ages 13-18 will complete feasibility and outcome measures while participating in a weekly skills group for 6 months.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Psychosis-risk skills group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 13-18 years of age
* Meet criteria for clinical high-risk syndrome (i.e., at clinical high risk for developing a psychotic disorder). CHR status is determined based off of scoring a 3 (moderate) - 5 (severe) on the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes and/or having a first degree relative with psychotic disorder and/or the individual meets criteria for schizotypal personality disorder. Additionally individuals with a brief intermittent psychotic symptoms can be included as well (e.g., frankly psychotic symptoms that are very brief)
* Individuals must be enrolled in the HOPE team at the University of Pittsburgh since this group is embedded within that service


* Must be the parent, legal guardian of a 13-18 year-old
* For parents of CHR adolescents, their adolescent must meet criteria for a psychosis-risk syndrome

Exclusion Criteria

* Group member meeting criteria for a current/past psychotic disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Leslie Horton

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leslie Horton, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bellefield Towers

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tina Gupta, PHD

Role: CONTACT

412-246-5845

Lauren Bylsma, PHD

Role: CONTACT

412-624-8363

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tina Gupta, MA

Role: primary

412-246-5845

Leslie Horton, PHD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Greco LA, Baer RA, Smith GT. Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):606-14. doi: 10.1037/a0022819.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21480722 (View on PubMed)

Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12916575 (View on PubMed)

Lecomte, T., Leclerc, C. & Wykes, T. 2003. Quick LL. Group CBT for Psychosis: A Guidebook for Clinicians.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.6.893. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3204199 (View on PubMed)

Kenardy JA, Spence SH, Macleod AC. Screening for posttraumatic stress disorder in children after accidental injury. Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):1002-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0406.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16950991 (View on PubMed)

Bernstein, D., & Fink, L. (1998). Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A retrospective self-report. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lynch, T. R. (2018b). Radically Open Dialectical Behavior Therapy: Theory and practice for treating disorders of overcontrol. Reno, NV: Context Press, an imprint of New Harbinger Publications, Inc.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6668417 (View on PubMed)

Beck AT, Baruch E, Balter JM, Steer RA, Warman DM. A new instrument for measuring insight: the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale. Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):319-29. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00189-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15099613 (View on PubMed)

Cane, D.B. Olinger, L.J,. Gotlib, I.H., Kuiper, N.A. (1986) Factor structure of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale in a student population. J Clin Psychol. 42, 307 - 309 .

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., & Brandt, J. (1998). The Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: Normative data and analysis of interform and test-retest reliability. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 43-55.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Keefe RS, Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Gold JM, Poe MP, Coughenour L. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: reliability, sensitivity, and comparison with a standard neurocognitive battery. Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):283-97. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15099610 (View on PubMed)

Greco LA, Lambert W, Baer RA. Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychol Assess. 2008 Jun;20(2):93-102. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.93.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18557686 (View on PubMed)

Cornblatt BA, Auther AM, Niendam T, Smith CW, Zinberg J, Bearden CE, Cannon TD. Preliminary findings for two new measures of social and role functioning in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2007 May;33(3):688-702. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm029. Epub 2007 Apr 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17440198 (View on PubMed)

Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance Scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 232-241.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Woods SW, Stein K, Driesen N, Corcoran CM, Hoffman R, Davidson L. Symptom assessment in schizophrenic prodromal states. Psychiatr Q. 1999 Winter;70(4):273-87. doi: 10.1023/a:1022034115078.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10587984 (View on PubMed)

Loewy RL, Pearson R, Vinogradov S, Bearden CE, Cannon TD. Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire--brief version (PQ-B). Schizophr Res. 2011 Jun;129(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.029. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21511440 (View on PubMed)

McGlashan, T. H., Walsh, B. C., Woods, S. W., Addington, J., Cadenhead, K., Cannon, T., & Walker, E. (2001). Structured interview for psychosis-risk syndromes. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Medicine.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Pelletier-Baldelli A, Strauss GP, Visser KH, Mittal VA. Initial development and preliminary psychometric properties of the Prodromal Inventory of Negative Symptoms (PINS). Schizophr Res. 2017 Nov;189:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.01.055. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28189529 (View on PubMed)

BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13688369 (View on PubMed)

Fusar-Poli P, Borgwardt S, Bechdolf A, Addington J, Riecher-Rossler A, Schultze-Lutter F, Keshavan M, Wood S, Ruhrmann S, Seidman LJ, Valmaggia L, Cannon T, Velthorst E, De Haan L, Cornblatt B, Bonoldi I, Birchwood M, McGlashan T, Carpenter W, McGorry P, Klosterkotter J, McGuire P, Yung A. The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;70(1):107-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.269.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23165428 (View on PubMed)

Lynch TR, Hempel RJ, Dunkley C. Radically Open-Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Disorders of Over-Control: Signaling Matters. Am J Psychother. 2015;69(2):141-62. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2015.69.2.141.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26160620 (View on PubMed)

McCauley E, Berk MS, Asarnow JR, Adrian M, Cohen J, Korslund K, Avina C, Hughes J, Harned M, Gallop R, Linehan MM. Efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents at High Risk for Suicide: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 1;75(8):777-785. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1109.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29926087 (View on PubMed)

Linehan MM, Korslund KE, Harned MS, Gallop RJ, Lungu A, Neacsiu AD, McDavid J, Comtois KA, Murray-Gregory AM. Dialectical behavior therapy for high suicide risk in individuals with borderline personality disorder: a randomized clinical trial and component analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 May;72(5):475-82. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3039.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25806661 (View on PubMed)

Strauss GP, Pelletier-Baldelli A, Visser KF, Walker EF, Mittal VA. A review of negative symptom assessment strategies in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2020 Aug;222:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.019. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32522469 (View on PubMed)

Lenz, A.S., James, P., Stewart, C. et al. A Preliminary Validation of the Youth Over- and Under-Control (YOU-C) Screening Measure with a Community Sample. Int J Adv Counselling 43, 489-503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-021-09439-9

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lehman, A., Kernan, E., & Postrado, L.Toolkit Evaluating Quality of Life for Persons with Severe Mental Illness. https://www.hsri.org/publication/toolkit_evaluating_quality_of_life_for_persons_with_severe_mental_illn

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lehman, A.F. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 51-62.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Oei, Tian Po & Green, Angela. (2008). The Satisfaction With Therapy and Therapist Scale-Revised (STTS-R) for Group Psychotherapy: Psychometric Properties and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 39. 10.1037/0735-7028.39.4.435.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Ritsher JB, Otilingam PG, Grajales M. Internalized stigma of mental illness: psychometric properties of a new measure. Psychiatry Res. 2003 Nov 1;121(1):31-49. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2003.08.008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14572622 (View on PubMed)

Woods SW, Lympus C, McGlashan TH, Walsh BC, Cannon TD. The Mini-SIPS: development of a brief clinical structured interview guide to diagnosing DSM-5 Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome and training outcomes. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04406-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36514073 (View on PubMed)

Gupta T, Antezana L, Porter C, Mayanil T, Bylsma LM, Maslar M, Horton LE. Skills program for awareness, connectedness, and empowerment: A conceptual framework of a skills group for individuals with a psychosis-risk syndrome. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 2;14:1083368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1083368. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37025348 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1 H79 SM081196-01

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

STUDY21120012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognitive - Behavioral Therapy
NCT00018629 COMPLETED PHASE2