Evaluation of Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score in Radical Prostatectomy With Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT ID: NCT05853133
Last Updated: 2024-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-16
2024-02-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, the investigator aimed to evaluate the postoperative recovery quality (Quality of Recovery score (QoR-40)) of patients who underwent open radical prostatectomy and underwent erector spina plan block and wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Analgesia Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Posterior Approach Quadratus Lumborum Block
NCT06075498
Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03413163
ESP Block in Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05170373
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Transurethral Prostate Resection Surgery
NCT06962085
Pre-post Erector Spine Plane Block-spinal Surgery
NCT06215053
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Group W: At the end of the operation,wound infiltration will be administered under general anesthesia in supine position by surgeon. Subfascial and subcutaneous wound infiltration is performed (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine each)
In the postoperative period, the patient was evaluated to the groups at the 2st and 6th, 12th and 24th hours. Visual pain scores (VAS) in rest and movement, hemodynamic values, tramadol consumption, nausea-vomiting score, ramsey sedation scale, postoperative complications will be recorded. A 40-item recovery of quality of score will be applied in the preoperative and postoperative period to evaluate the patient's quality of life.
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group E
ESP block will be applied bilaterally, 20 ml of %0.25 bupivacaine between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process at the 11th thoracic level.
Erector Spinae Plane Block
Group E (ESP block), before the operation, the ESP block will be applied to the patients in the prone position under sedation by same anesthesiologist. ESP block will be applied bilaterally, 20 ml of %0.25 bupivacaine between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process at the 11th thoracic level. All patients will be equipped with an IV tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. In the postoperative period, the patient was evaluated by another researcher who blind to the groups at the 2st and 6th, 12th and 24th hours. Visual pain scores (VAS) in rest and movement, hemodynamic values, tramadol consumption, nausea-vomiting score, ramsey sedation scale, postoperative complications will be recorded. A 40-item recovery of quality of score will be applied in the preoperative and postoperative period to evaluate the patient's quality of life.
Group W
Subfascial and subcutaneous wound infiltration is performed (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine each).
Wound Infiltration
Group W, at the end of the operation,wound infiltration will be administered under general anesthesia in supine position by same surgeon. Subfascial and subcutaneous wound infiltration is performed (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine each). All patients will be equipped with an IV tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. In the postoperative period, the patient was evaluated by another researcher who blind to the groups at the 2st and 6th, 12th and 24th hours. Visual pain scores (VAS) in rest and movement, hemodynamic values, tramadol consumption, nausea-vomiting score, ramsey sedation scale, postoperative complications will be recorded. A 40-item recovery of quality of score will be applied in the preoperative and postoperative period to evaluate the patient's quality of life.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erector Spinae Plane Block
Group E (ESP block), before the operation, the ESP block will be applied to the patients in the prone position under sedation by same anesthesiologist. ESP block will be applied bilaterally, 20 ml of %0.25 bupivacaine between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process at the 11th thoracic level. All patients will be equipped with an IV tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. In the postoperative period, the patient was evaluated by another researcher who blind to the groups at the 2st and 6th, 12th and 24th hours. Visual pain scores (VAS) in rest and movement, hemodynamic values, tramadol consumption, nausea-vomiting score, ramsey sedation scale, postoperative complications will be recorded. A 40-item recovery of quality of score will be applied in the preoperative and postoperative period to evaluate the patient's quality of life.
Wound Infiltration
Group W, at the end of the operation,wound infiltration will be administered under general anesthesia in supine position by same surgeon. Subfascial and subcutaneous wound infiltration is performed (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine each). All patients will be equipped with an IV tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. In the postoperative period, the patient was evaluated by another researcher who blind to the groups at the 2st and 6th, 12th and 24th hours. Visual pain scores (VAS) in rest and movement, hemodynamic values, tramadol consumption, nausea-vomiting score, ramsey sedation scale, postoperative complications will be recorded. A 40-item recovery of quality of score will be applied in the preoperative and postoperative period to evaluate the patient's quality of life.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Radical prostatectomy
Exclusion Criteria
* Coagulation disorder
* Known allergy history against to the study drugs
* Lack of adequate cognitive activity in the use of patient-controlled analgesia and VAS
18 Years
70 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Meryem Onay
Assistant Professor-Anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Meryem Onay
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty Of Medıcıne
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine
Eskişehir, Odunpazarı, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Elkassabany N, Ahmed M, Malkowicz SB, Heitjan DF, Isserman JA, Ochroch EA. Comparison between the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and placebo in open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Sep;25(6):459-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
Dost B, Kaya C, Ozdemir E, Ustun YB, Koksal E, Bilgin S, Bostanci Y. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Sep;72:110277. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110277. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Tulgar S, Senturk O. Ultrasound guided low thoracic erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in radical retropubic prostatectomy, a new indication. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Jun;47:4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 5. No abstract available.
Osaheni O, Idehen HO, Imarengiaye CO. Analgesia for postoperative myomectomy pain: A comparison of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and wound infiltration. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;23(11):1523-1529. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_162_19.
Lemoine A, Witdouck A, Beloeil H, Bonnet F; PROSPECT Working Group Of The European Society Of Regional Anaesthesia And Pain Therapy (ESRA). PROSPECT guidelines update for evidence-based pain management after prostatectomy for cancer. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Aug;40(4):100922. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100922. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
Canitez A, Kozanhan B, Aksoy N, Yildiz M, Tutar MS. Effect of erector spinae plane block on the postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;127(4):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ESOGU 5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.