Effect of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plan Block in Colorectal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05256953
Last Updated: 2022-02-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-25
2021-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block on Hemorrhoid and Pilonidal Sinus Surgery
NCT06459739
Pre-post Erector Spine Plane Block-spinal Surgery
NCT06215053
Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block After Caesarean Section
NCT04599842
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plan Block for Colorectal Surgery
NCT04313764
Bilateral Erector Spinal Plan Block in Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT05513196
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, the hypothesis was determined as "Pre-operatively, erector spina plane block (ESPB) performed as part of multimodal analgesia reduces postoperative morphine consumption and pain scores."
The patients were divided into two groups :
Group ESP (erector spinae plan):
In this group, patients will be administered bilateral ESPB (total of 40 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine) in addition to IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the first 24 postoperative hours.
Group GA (general anesthesia):
In this group, patients will be administered only IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the first 24 postoperative hours.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group ESP
bilateral ESPB (total of 40 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine) + IV morphine PCA
Erector spina plane block + general anesthesia
Bilateral-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block
Pre-operatively, with the patient in the sitting position, 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered between the T9 spinous process and the erector spinae muscles with the guidance of an ultrasound probe placed on a parasagittal plane. The same procedure was applied bilaterally.
Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied.
Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose.
Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).
Group GA
only IV morphine PCA
Only general anesthesia
Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied.
Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose.
Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erector spina plane block + general anesthesia
Bilateral-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block
Pre-operatively, with the patient in the sitting position, 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered between the T9 spinous process and the erector spinae muscles with the guidance of an ultrasound probe placed on a parasagittal plane. The same procedure was applied bilaterally.
Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied.
Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose.
Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).
Only general anesthesia
Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied.
Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose.
Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA I , II patients
* BMI\<35 kg/m2 (body weight \<100 kg , \>45 kg)
* Patients who underwent colorectal surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who were evaluated as unsuccessful block in the dermatomal examination performed after the block was applied.
* Patients diagnosed with OSAS
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding
* Contraindication of regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, abnormal INR, thrombocytopenia, infection at the injection site)
* Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or a history of allergy
* Patients with a history of opioid use longer than four weeks
* Patients with severe psychiatric diseases such as psychosis or dementia that limit cooperation with the patient.
* Patients with anatomic deformity ( advanced scoliosis and kyphotic patients. Patients with pectus carinatum and pectus excavatum-like chest deformity )
* Patients who do not want to participate
* Patients who have had previous colorectal surgery, excluding diagnostic biopsies
* Patients who could not be reached by phone to inquire about their pain score at 3rd month.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ondokuz Mayıs University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yasemin Burcu Ustun
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yasemin Burcu Üstün, Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Özgenur Kekül
Samsun, Other, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;68(3):387-408. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Tulgar S, Selvi O, Senturk O, Serifsoy TE, Thomas DT. Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block: Indications, Complications, and Effects on Acute and Chronic Pain Based on a Single-center Experience. Cureus. 2019 Jan 2;11(1):e3815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3815.
Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in the management of post thoracotomy pain syndrome: A case series. Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Kendall MC, Alves L, Traill LL, De Oliveira GS. The effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postsurgical pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 1;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01016-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRCESP140619
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.