Effect of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plan Block in Colorectal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05256953

Last Updated: 2022-02-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-25

Study Completion Date

2021-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effects erector spina plane block (ESPB) on postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours and pain scores after colorectal surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal surgery can be applied for many reasons, among these reasons, colorectal cancer (CRC) takes the first place. With the understanding of the pathophysiological effects of analgesics better, the use of regional techniques in providing analgesia for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery has come to the fore. Depending on the surgical procedure, pain faced by patients is an important problem that must be deal with in the postoperative period.

In this study, the hypothesis was determined as "Pre-operatively, erector spina plane block (ESPB) performed as part of multimodal analgesia reduces postoperative morphine consumption and pain scores."

The patients were divided into two groups :

Group ESP (erector spinae plan):

In this group, patients will be administered bilateral ESPB (total of 40 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine) in addition to IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the first 24 postoperative hours.

Group GA (general anesthesia):

In this group, patients will be administered only IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the first 24 postoperative hours.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Our study is a single center, prospective, randomized controlled, single-blinded, parallel group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. In the system where computer generated random numbers (SPSS v23.0, IBM, NewYork, USA) were used, ESP and GA groups were determined at a ratio of 1:1. Sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes were created. One hour before the operation, an experienced anesthesiologist, who was not involved in the intraoperative and postoperative follow-up of the patient and would only perform the block procedure, opened a sealed opaque sealed envelope to learn the group that the patient would be included in. There were two different physicians who performed intraoperative and postoperative follow-up. Both of the follow-up physicians were blind to the patient group. The care provider and investigator were also blinded to the participant.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group ESP

bilateral ESPB (total of 40 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine) + IV morphine PCA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Erector spina plane block + general anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block

Pre-operatively, with the patient in the sitting position, 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered between the T9 spinous process and the erector spinae muscles with the guidance of an ultrasound probe placed on a parasagittal plane. The same procedure was applied bilaterally.

Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied.

Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose.

Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).

Group GA

only IV morphine PCA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Only general anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied.

Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose.

Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erector spina plane block + general anesthesia

Bilateral-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block

Pre-operatively, with the patient in the sitting position, 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered between the T9 spinous process and the erector spinae muscles with the guidance of an ultrasound probe placed on a parasagittal plane. The same procedure was applied bilaterally.

Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied.

Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose.

Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Only general anesthesia

Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied.

Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose.

Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Group ESP Group GA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged between 18 and 65 years
* ASA I , II patients
* BMI\<35 kg/m2 (body weight \<100 kg , \>45 kg)
* Patients who underwent colorectal surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection
* Patients who were evaluated as unsuccessful block in the dermatomal examination performed after the block was applied.
* Patients diagnosed with OSAS
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding
* Contraindication of regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, abnormal INR, thrombocytopenia, infection at the injection site)
* Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or a history of allergy
* Patients with a history of opioid use longer than four weeks
* Patients with severe psychiatric diseases such as psychosis or dementia that limit cooperation with the patient.
* Patients with anatomic deformity ( advanced scoliosis and kyphotic patients. Patients with pectus carinatum and pectus excavatum-like chest deformity )
* Patients who do not want to participate
* Patients who have had previous colorectal surgery, excluding diagnostic biopsies
* Patients who could not be reached by phone to inquire about their pain score at 3rd month.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ondokuz Mayıs University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yasemin Burcu Ustun

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yasemin Burcu Üstün, Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Özgenur Kekül

Samsun, Other, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;68(3):387-408. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33403545 (View on PubMed)

Tulgar S, Selvi O, Senturk O, Serifsoy TE, Thomas DT. Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block: Indications, Complications, and Effects on Acute and Chronic Pain Based on a Single-center Experience. Cureus. 2019 Jan 2;11(1):e3815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3815.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30868029 (View on PubMed)

Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in the management of post thoracotomy pain syndrome: A case series. Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28919152 (View on PubMed)

Kendall MC, Alves L, Traill LL, De Oliveira GS. The effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postsurgical pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 1;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01016-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32357842 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRCESP140619

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESP Block in Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05170373 COMPLETED NA