Porcine Membrane vs Bovine Wound Dressing in Human Tooth Extraction Sites

NCT ID: NCT05802602

Last Updated: 2025-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-16

Study Completion Date

2025-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare porcine collagen membrane and bovine collagen wound dressing in human tooth extraction sites. The outcomes measured will be soft tissue thickness changes as well as bone density changes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a porcine collagen membrane to a bovine collagen wound dressing for atraumatic extractions. These are both commonly used as a barrier and containment material over atraumatic extraction sites that are grafted for future implant placement. The study will include nonsmoking adults aged 18-65 requiring premolar or anterior tooth extraction and graft procedures, who are in good general health and willing to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria include a history of radiation therapy or bisphosphonate use, pregnancy or breastfeeding, systemic conditions that affect bone healing, contraindications to dental implants, and inability to attend follow-up visits. The study will be a double-blind randomized controlled trial involving 24 patients who will be assigned to two groups. Prior to tooth extraction, baseline data will be collected; including gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling, and a limited field Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) radiograph. A reference digital scan will be taken to measure volumetric changes in soft tissue. Routine, atraumatic extraction of the tooth under local anesthetic will be performed. Following extraction, hydrated AllOss 50/50 DFDBA:FDBA (demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft:freeze-dried bone allograft) bone particulate will be condensed following a routine protocol. One group will receive Mucograft Seal over the graft, and the other group will receive Integra HeliPlug. Patients will be seen at a standard 2-week follow up to remove sutures, have a GCF sampling at the adjacent teeth and take another digital scan. Patients will be seen for an additional 6-week follow up to take a small (2mm) incisional biopsy for histological analysis. Another digital scan and GCF sampling will be taken. Final evaluation will be 3 months post-extraction and will include a localized CBCT evaluation for implant planning and another measure of soft tissue changes with a digital scan. At the time of implant surgery, the core of bone removed during osteotomy will be histologically analyzed for percentage of vital bone. Adverse events will also be recorded at each visit. The primary outcome measure will be the histological composition of tissue at 6 weeks and volumetric tissue changes. The secondary outcome measures will be bone density changes on the post-operative CBCT and inflammatory bio-markers present at baseline, 2-weeks via GCF sampling.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wound Heal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Porcine Collagen Membrane

Atraumatic tooth extraction with porcine collagen membrane placement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Porcine Collagen Membrane

Intervention Type DEVICE

Atraumatic tooth extraction with porcine collagen membrane placement

Bovine Collagen Dressing

Atraumatic tooth extraction with bovine collagen dressing placement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bovine Collagen Dressing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Atraumatic tooth extraction with bovine collagen dressing placement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Porcine Collagen Membrane

Atraumatic tooth extraction with porcine collagen membrane placement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bovine Collagen Dressing

Atraumatic tooth extraction with bovine collagen dressing placement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Mucograft Heliplug

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Non-smoking
* Aged 19-65
* Requiring premolar or anterior tooth extraction and graft procedures
* Good general health
* Willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of radiation therapy or bisphosphonate use
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Systemic conditions that affect bone healing
* Contraindications to dental implants
* Inability to attend follow-up visits.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nebraska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amy C Killeen, DDS, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Nebraska

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Dentistry

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0145-23-FB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.