Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-11-30
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. Comparison between these scoring systems in terms of sensitivity and specificity in both children and adults.
3. Design a toxicological sheet for Assiut poison control center that include this poisoning scoring system so it could help in assessing prognosis of acute poisoned cas
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Drug Overdose Poisoning Cases and Indications for ICU Admission
NCT04987801
EtCO2 Monitoring in Acute Self-poisoning
NCT01800123
Prognosis of Elderly Patients With Acute Poisoning.
NCT05185570
Assessment Of Different Scores In Predicting Outcome In AECOPD Patients In Emergency Department
NCT05793697
Evaluation of the Role of Poisoning Severity Score, Serum Procalcitonin and C-reactive Protein in Acute Hydrocarbon Intoxicated Cases Admitted to the Poison Control Center Ain Shams University Hospitals
NCT06151301
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Mortality prediction in acute poisoning cases has been explored by applying various clinical scoring systems used in critical care (Alizadeh et al, 2014; Banderas-Bravo et al., 2017) .
There are different non-specific scoring systems that depend physiological variables only such as:
1. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) score
2. Simplified Acute physiology score (SAPS) They are commonly applied tools in the intensive care unit; they are used for predicting the outcomes in poisoning cases. But they became of limited utility because they are time consuming. (Bilgin et al., 2005).
There are other non-specific scoring system but non time consuming such as
1. Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) was a powerful predictor of in hospital mortality in patients attending the ED
2. Simple Clinical Score (SCS) a quickly and accurately identifying patients at both a low and high risk of death. (J Kellett,et al ,2006) New Poisoning Mortality Score (PMS):is specific scoring system that depends on demographic variables, poisoning related variables and vital signs, so accurately predicted the probability of death for patients with acute poisoning. This could contribute to the clinical decision making for patients with acute poisoning at the ED (Han et al., 2021). Results indicated that 724 poisoning cases were admitted to Children's Hospital during the year 2012 in Assuit governorate, Prediction of prognosis in patients with acute poisoning has a clinical significance i.e., it helps in timely and appropriate treatment. However, toxicology research lacks a well-accepted method for assessing the severity of poisoning (Cheung et al., 2018). There is a lack in using and including this scoring systems in daily assessing of patients. Thus, the objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of a poisoning specific scoring system (PMS) and other nonspecific, physiologic, and rapid scoring systems (REMS and SCS). This could assist in treatment and therapeutic decision making at early stages for patients with acute poisoning.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2- Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide a written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who will be transferred from the initial ED to another hospital. Patients who have incomplete data on poisoning-related variables
* Pregnant women.- Patient presented with a delay more than 48
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Raghda Mostafa Shaban Ali
Effectiveness of Different Scoring Systems in Prediction of Prognosis in Acute Intoxicated Cases in Assiut University Hospitals
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Scoring systems
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.