Assessment Of Different Scores In Predicting Outcome In AECOPD Patients In Emergency Department
NCT ID: NCT05793697
Last Updated: 2023-03-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
139 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-05-03
2024-12-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD) is defined as an acute change in patient's dyspnea, cough, or sputum beyond normal variability that is sufficient to warrant a change in therapy. AECOPD has a negative effect on the quality of life, admission and readmission rates, and disease progression.
For these reasons, appropriate management of acute exacerbations is recommended by national and international organizations.
Identifying high-risk dying patients on hospital admission helps in triaging them to the required level of care.
The use of early warning scores in follow-up is recommended for the early detection of critically ill patients and the prediction of clinical deterioration. CURB65, BAP65, qSOFA , DECAF and NEWS, which mainly involve mental status, respiratory rate, oxygen saturations, pulse, blood pressure, age, BUN level, etc., can be used to predict AECOPD-associated mortality in ED given the simple structure and data availability.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient transferred to other centers.
* Inadequate data.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohammed Mostafa Saleh Hussein
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
reham mo abdelmonem, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut Uneversity
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Redfern OC, Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Inada-Kim M, Schmidt PE. A Comparison of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score and the National Early Warning Score in Non-ICU Patients With/Without Infection. Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1923-1933. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003359.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
different scores in AECOPD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id