Effects of Stress on Team Coordination and Performance

NCT ID: NCT05798052

Last Updated: 2023-04-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-30

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Healthcare teams often encounter challenging circumstances where they must deliver high-quality care. For a team to function effectively, its members must not only be individually competent, but they also need to collaborate and cooperate using their respective expertise. Such teams often work under high stress situations, where they need to make high stakes decisions under conditions of uncertainty, time-sensitivity and variable levels of control. Research shows that such emergency situations provoke stress responses in individuals, which can impair attention, memory, reasoning, and decision-making. However, it remains unclear how individual-level stress responses influence team communication, coordination, and performance. The aims of this study are to a) compare team coordination, communication, and performance in low stress versus high stress simulated emergency situations; and b) characterize the relationship between teams' stress profiles and the teams' performance and coordination. The study will be a within-subject experimental design, with teams serving as their own controls. Teams of emergency medicine residents and nurses will participate in two simulation scenarios: one in a low stress condition, and the other in a high stress condition (counterbalanced across the teams).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Healthcare teams often encounter challenging circumstances where they must deliver high-quality care. For a team to function effectively, its members must not only be individually competent, but they also need to collaborate and cooperate using their respective expertise. Effective teamwork has been demonstrated to have a positive effect on patient outcomes and adherence to treatment guidelines. As a result, team training interventions have become increasingly prevalent in healthcare. These interventions predominantly focus on generic team competencies that can be transported across different situations and team compositions. A recent meta-analysis found that team training resulted in large effect sizes for the learning and transfer of cognitive and skills-based outcomes, but weaker effects on teamwork performance and medical errors. As such, there are calls to better understand the factors that affect teamwork. Teams often work under high stress situations, where they need to make high stakes decisions under conditions of uncertainty, time-sensitivity and variable levels of control. Research shows that such emergency situations provoke stress responses in individuals, which can impair attention, memory, reasoning, and decision-making. However, it remains unclear how individual-level stress responses influence team communication, coordination, and performance. The aims of this study are to a) compare team coordination, communication, and performance in low stress versus high stress simulated emergency situations; and b) characterize the relationship between teams' stress profiles and the teams' performance and coordination.

Methods: The study will be a randomized control trial, with teams serving as their own controls. Teams of emergency medicine residents and nurses will participate in two simulation scenarios: one in a low stress condition, and the other in a high stress condition (counterbalanced across the teams). Based on previous similar studies on the impact of stress on individual performance, where large effects sizes are seen (.7 -.75)8, the study will recruit a minimum of 17 teams (two-tailed test, alpha set at .05 and power set at .80). In both low and high stress scenario versions, the underlying mechanism of disease or injury will be identical, as will be the expected clinical management of the situation. Known stressors will be added to the scenarios, ensuring ecological validity (stressors that occur in real life). The stressors will include a) socio-evaluative stressors (presence of other with ability to negatively judge); b) increases in the severity of the situation (unstable patient); c) increases in the stakes (e.g. woman in early stages of pregnancy), d) noise, as well as e) unexpected brief complications (e.g. brief equipment challenge).

The participants' subjective (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory- STAI11, cognitive appraisal) and physiological stress (heart rate variability) responses will be measured. Stress responses will be compared at baseline, immediately before, and immediately after each scenario, as well as during for the physiological measures. The team performance will be assessed using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Reaction Stress, Psychological Stress, Physiological

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Teams will be assigned to manage simulated clinical scenarios in two order: low stress then high stress, high stress then low stress.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Assessors, who are blinded to the study hypotheses and manipulations, will score video-recordings of the teams, in terms of their performance and their coordination patterns.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low-High stress group

Complete the first simulated clinical scenario in the low stress condition, then complete the second simulated scenario in the high stress condition.

Group Type OTHER

Psychological stressors added to simulated clinical scenarios.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In both low and high stress scenario versions, the underlying mechanism of disease or injury will be identical, as will be the expected clinical management of the situation. Known stressors9,10 will be added to the scenarios, ensuring ecological validity (stressors that occur in real life). The stressors will include a) socio-evaluative stressors (presence of other with ability to negatively judge); b) increases in the severity of the situation (unstable patient); c) increases in the stakes (e.g. woman in early stages of pregnancy), d) noise, as well as e) unexpected brief complications (e.g. brief equipment challenge).

High-Low stress groups

Complete the first simulated clinical scenario in the high stress condition, then complete the second simulated scenario in the low stress condition.

Group Type OTHER

Psychological stressors added to simulated clinical scenarios.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In both low and high stress scenario versions, the underlying mechanism of disease or injury will be identical, as will be the expected clinical management of the situation. Known stressors9,10 will be added to the scenarios, ensuring ecological validity (stressors that occur in real life). The stressors will include a) socio-evaluative stressors (presence of other with ability to negatively judge); b) increases in the severity of the situation (unstable patient); c) increases in the stakes (e.g. woman in early stages of pregnancy), d) noise, as well as e) unexpected brief complications (e.g. brief equipment challenge).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Psychological stressors added to simulated clinical scenarios.

In both low and high stress scenario versions, the underlying mechanism of disease or injury will be identical, as will be the expected clinical management of the situation. Known stressors9,10 will be added to the scenarios, ensuring ecological validity (stressors that occur in real life). The stressors will include a) socio-evaluative stressors (presence of other with ability to negatively judge); b) increases in the severity of the situation (unstable patient); c) increases in the stakes (e.g. woman in early stages of pregnancy), d) noise, as well as e) unexpected brief complications (e.g. brief equipment challenge).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Teams of postgraduate residents enrolled at the University of Ottawa, and The Ottawa Hospital emergency medicine nurses scheduled to attend simulation education sessions organized within their department.

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Ottawa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Ottawa Skills and Simulation Centre

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020752-01H

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Strategies for Responding to Stress
NCT03289156 COMPLETED NA