Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-02-01
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To assess the effect of the stress management intervention on sustainable return to work.
To investigate what contexts and mechanisms are associated with patients' return to work rates and level of perceived stress after having received the stress management intervention.
To understand from a patient perspective how mechanisms work in specific contexts to generate effects of the stress management intervention.
The evaluation comprises two observational studies and one interview study. The intervention cohort are patients with work-related stress who received the stress management intervention between 2012-2018.
The comparison cohort are patients who would have been eligible to receive the intervention in 2011-2012, however they did not receive any intervention because it was not offered at that time.
In study one return to work rates are compared between the intervention cohort and the comparison cohort to find out if the intervention can help patients return to work at a faster rate.
Study two will investigate if there are any explanatory variables (such as work type, civil status or level of depressive symptoms) that may explain why some patients benefit more or less from the intervention.
Study three will explore what it is about the intervention (mechanisms) the patients find are helping them to cope with stress or the opposite in specific circumstances.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stress Prevention at Work: Intervention Efficacy and Implementation Process Evaluation
NCT02694211
Leading Well-being and the Psychosocial Working Environment - A Cluster-randomized Waitlist Controlled Trial
NCT05623371
Stop for Stress - a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Online and a Group-based Format of an Intervention for Work-related Stress
NCT06799403
Stress Management Programs in Fire-fighters
NCT02137941
Stress at Work and Infectious Risk in Patients and Caregivers
NCT03532321
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention cohort
Patients with work-related stress (F43.2/8/9 or Z56.3 (ICD-0)) who received the stress management intervention between 2011-2018 (N\>400). The intervention is based on cognitive behavioral therapy, delivered by a trained psychologist in groups of 8-10 patients. The intervention consists of 8 sessions in 3 months, with a booster session 3 months after the intervention has ended.
MARS (Measures Against Work-related Stress)
The stress management intervention is based on cognitive behavioral therapy and aims to change the way patients perceive and cope with stressful situations at work.
It is group sessions over 3 months with approximately 9 participants. Participants meet 9 times (once a week the first 3 weeks and once every second week the last 5 times) and for a follow-up session 3 months after the intervention has ended. Each session lasts for 3 hours and is led by a trained psychologist. The participants perform tasks at home between the sessions. In the first session the rationale behind the intervention is introduced. In session 2 and 3 the patients work with enhancing self-regulation. In session 4 and 5 the focus is on modifying intermediate beliefs. In session 6 the focus is on improving interaction. Session 7 and 8 focuses on consolidation of learning and strategies to prevent relapse, and session 9 is a follow-up session 3 months after the intervention has ended.
Comparison cohort
Patients with work-related stress (diagnoses F43.2/8/9 or Z56.3 (ICD-10)) who was seen at a consultation at Department of Occupational and Environmental Health in Odense (DOEM) in 2011-2012, but did not receive the intervention because it was not yet offered. The patients were offered advice and support by a psychologist (usual care). The intervention was introduced at DOEM in 2011 for a limited number of patients due to introducing the intervention and establishing the capacity of psychologists involved. In 2013 the intervention was implemented at full scale to include every eligible patient.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MARS (Measures Against Work-related Stress)
The stress management intervention is based on cognitive behavioral therapy and aims to change the way patients perceive and cope with stressful situations at work.
It is group sessions over 3 months with approximately 9 participants. Participants meet 9 times (once a week the first 3 weeks and once every second week the last 5 times) and for a follow-up session 3 months after the intervention has ended. Each session lasts for 3 hours and is led by a trained psychologist. The participants perform tasks at home between the sessions. In the first session the rationale behind the intervention is introduced. In session 2 and 3 the patients work with enhancing self-regulation. In session 4 and 5 the focus is on modifying intermediate beliefs. In session 6 the focus is on improving interaction. Session 7 and 8 focuses on consolidation of learning and strategies to prevent relapse, and session 9 is a follow-up session 3 months after the intervention has ended.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must be employed, and if on sick leave there must be plans for return to work during the intervention period.
* Patients must exhibit severe signs of work-related stress meaning that there must have been a significant work-related impact, the patient must have had physical, psychological, and behavioural stress symptoms for more than four weeks.
Exclusion Criteria
* long-term sick leave \>26 weeks up to referral
* more severe stress load outside of work
* severe psychiatric conditions that requires treatment
* current abuse of alcohol and/or psychoactive stimulants.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
University of Southern Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lotte N Andersen, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Southern Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Odense, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IOB_SDU_CBB_LNA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.