A Communication Tool to Improve Communication in the ICU

NCT ID: NCT05780918

Last Updated: 2025-10-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on quality of communication, clinician moral distress, and ICU length of stay for older adults with serious traumatic injury. Investigators will follow an estimated 4500 patients aged 50 years and older who are in the ICU for 3 or more days and survey 1500 family members and up to 1600 clinicians from 8 sites nationwide.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multisite, stepped-wedge, randomized clinical trial. At the start of the study, investigators will randomly assign each site to the time when the intervention team will train all trauma surgeons, trainees, and ICU clinicians to use the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU tool. Participants in the intervention group will receive care from a trauma team that routinely uses the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool. Participants in the control group will receive usual care.

The study team will follow an estimated 4,500 patients with the highest post-injury mortality: aged 50 years and older with an ICU length of stay of 3 or more days. They will administer surveys to family members (quality of communication) and clinicians (moral distress) and obtain patient-level outcomes (ICU length of stay (LOS)), clinical data, and demographics from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) national registry.

Objectives:

* Aim 1: To test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on improving the quality of communication in the trauma ICU.
* Aim 2: To test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on reducing clinician moral distress in the ICU.
* Aim 3: To test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on reducing ICU length of stay.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Serious Injury Communication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, sites randomized to start time.

The intervention will be administered as a quality improvement activity because its primary purpose is to increase behaviors recommended by professional societies, e.g., timely communication with families and emotional support.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Best Case/Worst Case-ICU Communication Tool

Patients in the intervention group will receive care from a trauma team that routinely uses the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Best Case/Worst Case-ICU Communication Tool

Intervention Type OTHER

This intervention uses scenario planning and a daily report of the interplay between major events and prognosis to illustrate a range of long-term outcomes and treatment experiences. By using a graphic aid to illustrate "what we are hoping for," "what we are worried about," and the evolution of the patient's story over time, the tool aims to facilitate dialogue among older adult trauma patients, their families, and the trauma team. Because the tool delivers critical prognostic information over the longitudinal course of care, subsequent treatment decisions can be made within the context of the patient's overall health status. This information alerts patients and families to the life-limiting nature of serious injury and provides an entrée for them to consider how comfort-focused strategies might better align with patients' end-of-life goals.

All clinicians will be trained to create, use, and/or reference the graphic aids with patients depending on their roles in the trauma ICU.

Usual Care

Prior to implementation of the intervention, patients admitted to the trauma ICU will receive usual care. Usual care typically includes conversations focused on isolated problems, disarticulated from the patient's overall health trajectory. This is typified by the systems-base review, routinely summarizing each patient on rounds where the clinician lists each physiologic system, (e.g., neuro, cardiac, pulmonary…) with an assessment and plan to "fix" each abnormality with a new treatment. Deliberation about how these individual treatments align with patient preferences is typically prompted by major events like failure to liberate from a ventilator or imminent death. This pattern of usual care is well characterized and differs from daily scenario planning with the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Best Case/Worst Case-ICU Communication Tool

This intervention uses scenario planning and a daily report of the interplay between major events and prognosis to illustrate a range of long-term outcomes and treatment experiences. By using a graphic aid to illustrate "what we are hoping for," "what we are worried about," and the evolution of the patient's story over time, the tool aims to facilitate dialogue among older adult trauma patients, their families, and the trauma team. Because the tool delivers critical prognostic information over the longitudinal course of care, subsequent treatment decisions can be made within the context of the patient's overall health status. This information alerts patients and families to the life-limiting nature of serious injury and provides an entrée for them to consider how comfort-focused strategies might better align with patients' end-of-life goals.

All clinicians will be trained to create, use, and/or reference the graphic aids with patients depending on their roles in the trauma ICU.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged 50 and older
* admitted to the ICU for 3 or more days after serious injury


* aged 18 and older
* patient's family member or informally designated "like family" or primary surrogate decision maker
* speak English or Spanish


* provide care in the trauma ICU (including attending trauma surgeons, fellows, residents, advance practice providers, bedside nurses and medical assistants, respiratory techs and physical therapists, social workers, and chaplains)

Exclusion Criteria

* none

Family Members


* does not have decision-making capacity

Clinicians


* do not provide care in the trauma ICU
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Maryland, Baltimore

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lehigh Valley Health Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Grady Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Froedtert Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rhode Island Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

American College of Surgeons

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Coalition for National Trauma Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Margaret L Schwarze, MD, MPP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of California Davis Medical Center

Davis, California, United States

Site Status

Grady Memorial Hospital - Morehouse School of Medicine

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Shock Trauma - University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Lehigh Valley Health Network

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital - Brown University

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Harborview Medical Center - University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Froedtert Hospital - Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stalter L, Hanlon BM, Bushaw KJ, Kwekkeboom KL, Zelenski A, Fritz M, Buffington A, Stein DM, Cocanour CS, Robles AJ, Jansen J, Brasel K, O'Connell KM, Cipolle MD, Ayoung-Chee P, Morris R, Gelbard RB, Kozar RA, Lueckel S, Schwarze M. Best Case/Worst Case-ICU: protocol for a multisite, stepped-wedge, randomised clinical trial of scenario planning to improve communication in the ICU in US trauma centres for older adults with serious injury. BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 28;14(8):e083603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083603.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39209498 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01AG078242-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

Protocol Version 5/5/2025

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

A539750

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2022-0334

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Driver Training After Stroke
NCT06672107 RECRUITING