Digital Decision Support in the Management of Patients With Chest Pain
NCT ID: NCT05767619
Last Updated: 2023-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-05-15
2027-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
• Performance of a machine learning based model for decision support of patients in contact with emergency medical services due to chest pain
Participants will be asked to:
* respond to questions asked by the clinician at the scene regarding previous known risk factors and pain characteristics
* consent to the collection of routinely available data from medical records
* consent of taking one blood sample capillary or venous (if perifer catheter is placed for standard care reasons) troponin and glucose which is measured at the scene, disposed, and the result is entered in the clinical report form.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prehospital Translation of Chest Pain Tools
NCT03494556
Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Chest Pain Choice Trial
NCT01969240
Color Priming and Patient Decision-Making in the Emergency Department: Priming "Threat" in Patients With Low-Risk Chest Pain
NCT04749147
Chest Pain Nurse Track
NCT06149819
Low-Risk Chest Pain Echo Study
NCT05785923
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In principle, there is three overall levels of care:1) Need for inpatient resources;2) Need for primary care contact or visit by mobile healthcare team within the next day and 3) Referral to home care, provide support for self-care or treatment on site.
This places competence requirements on the ambulance nurse with requirements for a prehospital assessed condition compatible with a level of care where the patient's needs can be met. This approach puts patient safety in focus in a different way than before. Because with this procedure, patients with time-sensitive conditions (such as stroke, heart attack, acute myocardial infarction and sepsis) run an increased risk of being left at the scene with advice on self-care, due to inappropriate prehospital assessment. In prehospital emergency care, the assessment of the severity of the patient's condition takes place in two stages: 1) At the emergency dispatch centre when the patient has called the national emergency number and 2) At the scene of the illness by the ambulance nurse after arrival at the patients side.
The basis for prehospital decision support is a) identification of time-sensitive conditions, i.e. conditions where the time to initiation of causal treatment can affect the prognosis, and b) identification of predictors, i.e. factors that are already prehospitally characteristic of the condition (disease or accident) itself, but also of the severity of the condition. The classic examples of time-critical conditions are manifestations of cardiovascular diseases such as heart attack ,acute myocardial infarction and stroke, but also serious infectious diseases such as sepsis and severe trauma. Predictors can be identified via measurement of vital parameters such as pulse, blood pressure and oxygen saturation, medical history (previously known diseases and current onset), current symptom picture, clinical manifestations ( pallor) examination findings (ECG) and analysis of biochemical markers by capillary blood test (glucose, troponin).
Current studies indicate that for many patients in contact with the emergency medical service due to acute chest pain, other options than the emergency department, e.g. follow-up in primary care, may be more beneficial for the patient and less resource-intensive for the ambulance and the emergency care. In these cases, a decision support system based on gender, medical history, symptoms and clinical observations including ECG and and biochemical markers, (troponin) could provide support for the ambulance nurse. Chest pain is one of the most common search causes and constitutes about 10% of assignments in the Swedish emergency medical service.
Linked to the assessment in the prehospital environment is patient safety. An inappropriate prehospital assessment can compromise patient safety and risk delaying time to treatment. Primarily, it refers to patients with time-sensitive conditions who are not transported by ambulance directly to hospital after the initial assessment. At the same time, patient safety can be compromised by transporting frail elderly people to an emergency room, where long wait times can increase the risk of complications. Transportation of low-risk patients can also increase the risk of crowding in the emergency department and also have a crowding-out effect (lack of ambulance availability in case of high priority cases). An example of displacement effects is extended response times for the ambulance in the event of sudden unexpected cardiac arrests.
Patient safety is poorly studied in the prehospital setting. Own experiences indicate that the risk of adverse events in so-called "Prio1 assignments" (highest priority) is particularly high and that in about 20% of these assignments the prehospital assessment can be questioned.
The goal of the present study is to evaluate and further develop a decision support system developed within the Emergency Medical Service in Region Halland, Sweden with collection of variables to validate the previously developed model on unseen data and to further develop a machine learning model for classification. The idea is that such decision support should provide support for the ambulance nurse in the assessment of the patient at the scene, partly to optimize the possibility of the patient quickly getting to the right level of care and partly to increase patient safety. The objective is to only collect data at the scene (blood test + questionnaire) together with routine data from medical records. Patients consenting to be part of the study will not receive any other care than standard care according to guidelines which constitutes transport to the emergency department for further examination.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Troponin hs-cTnI
One sample of Troponin (hs-cTnI) is obtained and analyzed at the scene. Capillary blood sample or venous (lithium heparin) if peripheral venous catheter is inserted for standard care reasons. The sample is disposed after the result has been recorded in the clinical report form. The clinicians participating in the study are instructed and have been educated about the study to only collect the data (report form with measurements) and provide care as constituted by the guidelines. Patients will be monitored by board members that standard clinical care is provided.
Plasma glucose
One sample of plasma glucose is obtained and analyzed at the scene. The sample is then disposed and the measured value is recorded in the clinical report form. P-glucose measurement is clinical practice in standard care and is measured on all patients with diabetes and patients with altered mental status or at the ambulance nurse discretion.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary assignment (not assessed by physician in primary care, hospital)
Exclusion Criteria
* Under 18 years of age
* Unwillingness to participate
* Unable to participate (language, dementia, etc.)
* Other
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Region Halland, Sweden
UNKNOWN
Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Skaraborg, Vastra Gotaland Region, Sweden
UNKNOWN
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
OTHER
Vastra Gotaland Region
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carl Magnusson
Head prehospital nurse, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carl Magnusson, PhD,RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University hospital
Johan Herlitz, PhD,MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Borås
Araz Rawshani, PhD,MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University hospital
Annica Ravn-Fischer, PhD,MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University hospital
Angela Bång, PhD,RN
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Göteborg University
Kristoffer Wibring, PhD,RN
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Region Halland
Jan-Otto Andersson, Msc,RN
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Region Västra Götaland, Skaraborg
Christer Axelsson, PhD,RN
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Borås
Markus Lingman, PhD,MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Region Halland
Ola Hammarsten, PhD,MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Prehospital Emergency Care,Region Halland
Kungsbacka, Region Halland, Sweden
Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, Region Vastra Gotaland, Sweden
Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Skaraborg
Lidköping, Region Vastra Gotaland, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lokholm E, Magnusson C, Herlitz J, Ravn-Fischer A, Hammarsten O, Johansson M, Hallin K, Wibring K. The development of a decision support tool in the prehospital setting for acute chest pain - a study protocol for an observational study (BRIAN2). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 6;33(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01314-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-01066-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.