Digital Decision Support in the Management of Patients With Chest Pain

NCT ID: NCT05767619

Last Updated: 2023-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

2000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-15

Study Completion Date

2027-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to develop a decision support system in patients presenting with chest pain in the prehospital setting. The main question it aims to answer is:

• Performance of a machine learning based model for decision support of patients in contact with emergency medical services due to chest pain

Participants will be asked to:

* respond to questions asked by the clinician at the scene regarding previous known risk factors and pain characteristics
* consent to the collection of routinely available data from medical records
* consent of taking one blood sample capillary or venous (if perifer catheter is placed for standard care reasons) troponin and glucose which is measured at the scene, disposed, and the result is entered in the clinical report form.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prehospital emergency care has undergone dramatic changes in recent decades. From the fact that the ambulance nurse has previously started care at the site of the illness, with the goal of transporting the patient to the nearest emergency room, prehospital care has become increasingly differentiated. This means that "care at the right level of care" has become a watchword and a number of different levels of care have become relevant, ranging from fast track and rapid investigation and treatment in hospital for heart attack, acute myocardial infarctions and strokes to the patient being left at the scene with advice on self-care.

In principle, there is three overall levels of care:1) Need for inpatient resources;2) Need for primary care contact or visit by mobile healthcare team within the next day and 3) Referral to home care, provide support for self-care or treatment on site.

This places competence requirements on the ambulance nurse with requirements for a prehospital assessed condition compatible with a level of care where the patient's needs can be met. This approach puts patient safety in focus in a different way than before. Because with this procedure, patients with time-sensitive conditions (such as stroke, heart attack, acute myocardial infarction and sepsis) run an increased risk of being left at the scene with advice on self-care, due to inappropriate prehospital assessment. In prehospital emergency care, the assessment of the severity of the patient's condition takes place in two stages: 1) At the emergency dispatch centre when the patient has called the national emergency number and 2) At the scene of the illness by the ambulance nurse after arrival at the patients side.

The basis for prehospital decision support is a) identification of time-sensitive conditions, i.e. conditions where the time to initiation of causal treatment can affect the prognosis, and b) identification of predictors, i.e. factors that are already prehospitally characteristic of the condition (disease or accident) itself, but also of the severity of the condition. The classic examples of time-critical conditions are manifestations of cardiovascular diseases such as heart attack ,acute myocardial infarction and stroke, but also serious infectious diseases such as sepsis and severe trauma. Predictors can be identified via measurement of vital parameters such as pulse, blood pressure and oxygen saturation, medical history (previously known diseases and current onset), current symptom picture, clinical manifestations ( pallor) examination findings (ECG) and analysis of biochemical markers by capillary blood test (glucose, troponin).

Current studies indicate that for many patients in contact with the emergency medical service due to acute chest pain, other options than the emergency department, e.g. follow-up in primary care, may be more beneficial for the patient and less resource-intensive for the ambulance and the emergency care. In these cases, a decision support system based on gender, medical history, symptoms and clinical observations including ECG and and biochemical markers, (troponin) could provide support for the ambulance nurse. Chest pain is one of the most common search causes and constitutes about 10% of assignments in the Swedish emergency medical service.

Linked to the assessment in the prehospital environment is patient safety. An inappropriate prehospital assessment can compromise patient safety and risk delaying time to treatment. Primarily, it refers to patients with time-sensitive conditions who are not transported by ambulance directly to hospital after the initial assessment. At the same time, patient safety can be compromised by transporting frail elderly people to an emergency room, where long wait times can increase the risk of complications. Transportation of low-risk patients can also increase the risk of crowding in the emergency department and also have a crowding-out effect (lack of ambulance availability in case of high priority cases). An example of displacement effects is extended response times for the ambulance in the event of sudden unexpected cardiac arrests.

Patient safety is poorly studied in the prehospital setting. Own experiences indicate that the risk of adverse events in so-called "Prio1 assignments" (highest priority) is particularly high and that in about 20% of these assignments the prehospital assessment can be questioned.

The goal of the present study is to evaluate and further develop a decision support system developed within the Emergency Medical Service in Region Halland, Sweden with collection of variables to validate the previously developed model on unseen data and to further develop a machine learning model for classification. The idea is that such decision support should provide support for the ambulance nurse in the assessment of the patient at the scene, partly to optimize the possibility of the patient quickly getting to the right level of care and partly to increase patient safety. The objective is to only collect data at the scene (blood test + questionnaire) together with routine data from medical records. Patients consenting to be part of the study will not receive any other care than standard care according to guidelines which constitutes transport to the emergency department for further examination.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chest Pain Acute Coronary Syndrome Chest--Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Troponin hs-cTnI

One sample of Troponin (hs-cTnI) is obtained and analyzed at the scene. Capillary blood sample or venous (lithium heparin) if peripheral venous catheter is inserted for standard care reasons. The sample is disposed after the result has been recorded in the clinical report form. The clinicians participating in the study are instructed and have been educated about the study to only collect the data (report form with measurements) and provide care as constituted by the guidelines. Patients will be monitored by board members that standard clinical care is provided.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Plasma glucose

One sample of plasma glucose is obtained and analyzed at the scene. The sample is then disposed and the measured value is recorded in the clinical report form. P-glucose measurement is clinical practice in standard care and is measured on all patients with diabetes and patients with altered mental status or at the ambulance nurse discretion.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Siemens Atellica VTLi point of care instrument.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient in contact with the emergency medical service and patient main symptom is chest pain or chest discomfort
* Primary assignment (not assessed by physician in primary care, hospital)

Exclusion Criteria

* Assignment taking place outside participating emergency medical service organisation geographical catchment area
* Under 18 years of age
* Unwillingness to participate
* Unable to participate (language, dementia, etc.)
* Other
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Region Halland, Sweden

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Skaraborg, Vastra Gotaland Region, Sweden

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vastra Gotaland Region

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carl Magnusson

Head prehospital nurse, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carl Magnusson, PhD,RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University hospital

Johan Herlitz, PhD,MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Borås

Araz Rawshani, PhD,MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University hospital

Annica Ravn-Fischer, PhD,MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University hospital

Angela Bång, PhD,RN

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Göteborg University

Kristoffer Wibring, PhD,RN

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Region Halland

Jan-Otto Andersson, Msc,RN

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Region Västra Götaland, Skaraborg

Christer Axelsson, PhD,RN

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Borås

Markus Lingman, PhD,MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Region Halland

Ola Hammarsten, PhD,MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Prehospital Emergency Care,Region Halland

Kungsbacka, Region Halland, Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, Region Vastra Gotaland, Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Skaraborg

Lidköping, Region Vastra Gotaland, Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Carl Magnusson, PhD,RN

Role: CONTACT

+46708868620

Kristoffer Wibring, PhD,RN

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kristoffer Wibring, PhD

Role: primary

+467071757679

Carl Magnusson, PhD

Role: primary

0708868620

Jan-Otto Andersson, Msc,RN

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lokholm E, Magnusson C, Herlitz J, Ravn-Fischer A, Hammarsten O, Johansson M, Hallin K, Wibring K. The development of a decision support tool in the prehospital setting for acute chest pain - a study protocol for an observational study (BRIAN2). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 6;33(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01314-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39762958 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-01066-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.