Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Chest Pain Choice Trial
NCT ID: NCT01969240
Last Updated: 2018-08-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
898 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Test if Chest Pain Choice safely improves validated patient-centered outcome measures in a pragmatic parallel patient randomized trial.
Hypothesis: The intervention will significantly increase patient knowledge, engagement, and satisfaction with no increase in adverse events.
2. Test if the decision aid has an effect on healthcare utilization within 30 days after enrollment.
Hypothesis: The intervention will significantly reduce the rate of hospital admission, rate of cardiac testing, and total healthcare utilization.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Low-Risk Chest Pain Echo Study
NCT05785923
Digital Decision Support in the Management of Patients With Chest Pain
NCT05767619
Non-Interruptive Alerts for Improving Use of Clinical Decision Rules
NCT04702308
Color Priming and Patient Decision-Making in the Emergency Department: Priming "Threat" in Patients With Low-Risk Chest Pain
NCT04749147
Prospective Registry for Patients With Chest Pain in Emergency Department
NCT05058300
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid
Patients randomized to the decision aid arm.
Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid
The clinician will review the decision aid with the patient. The decision aid will be used as a tool to facilitate discussion and educate the patient regarding the rationale for their evaluation up to that point in the emergency department visit and their individual risk for a heart attack or pre-heart attack. The clinician will provide the patient with management options consistent with both the patient's values and preferences and the clinician's level of comfort.
Usual Care
Patients randomized to the usual care arm (no decision aid used)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid
The clinician will review the decision aid with the patient. The decision aid will be used as a tool to facilitate discussion and educate the patient regarding the rationale for their evaluation up to that point in the emergency department visit and their individual risk for a heart attack or pre-heart attack. The clinician will provide the patient with management options consistent with both the patient's values and preferences and the clinician's level of comfort.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Admitted to emergency department for chest pain.
3. Being considered by the treating clinician for admission for cardiac testing.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) above the 99th percentile reference limit.
3. Known coronary artery disease as defined by consensus guidelines on risk stratification studies for emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (≥ 50% stenosis on cardiac catheterization; prior electrocardiographic changes indicative of ischemia, e.g., ST-segment depression, T-wave inversion, or left bundle branch block; perfusion defects or wall motion abnormalities on previous exercise, pharmacological, or rest imaging studies; previous documentation of acute myocardial infarction; or, if no records are available, patient self-report of coronary artery disease).
4. Cocaine use within the previous 72 hours by clinician history.
5. Pregnancy.
6. Referral to the emergency department by a personal physician for admission.
7. Patients who indicate that a hospital different than the site hospital is his or her "hospital of choice" in the event of a return emergency department visit.
8. Patients undergoing medical clearance for a detox center or any involuntary court or magistrate order.
9. Homelessness, out-of-town residence or other condition known to preclude follow-up.
10. Patients in police custody or currently incarcerated individuals.
11. Patients who have, in their clinician's best judgment, major communication barriers such as visual or hearing impairment or dementia that would compromise their ability to give written informed consent (or use the decision aid).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
Indiana University
OTHER
University of California, Davis
OTHER
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erik P. Hess
MD, MSc, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Erik Hess, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, California, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Indiana University Hospital: IU
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hess EP, Hollander JE, Schaffer JT, Kline JA, Torres CA, Diercks DB, Jones R, Owen KP, Meisel ZF, Demers M, Leblanc A, Shah ND, Inselman J, Herrin J, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Montori VM. Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trial. BMJ. 2016 Dec 5;355:i6165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6165.
Anderson RT, Montori VM, Shah ND, Ting HH, Pencille LJ, Demers M, Kline JA, Diercks DB, Hollander JE, Torres CA, Schaffer JT, Herrin J, Branda M, Leblanc A, Hess EP. Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials. 2014 May 10;15:166. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-166.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-001359
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.