Color Priming and Patient Decision-Making in the Emergency Department: Priming "Threat" in Patients With Low-Risk Chest Pain
NCT ID: NCT04749147
Last Updated: 2023-02-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-04
2022-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prehospital Translation of Chest Pain Tools
NCT03494556
Low-Risk Chest Pain Echo Study
NCT05785923
Non-Interruptive Alerts for Improving Use of Clinical Decision Rules
NCT04702308
Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Chest Pain Choice Trial
NCT01969240
Digital Decision Support in the Management of Patients With Chest Pain
NCT05767619
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Black and White Print
The survey concerns the patients' chest pain, perception of their safety, and their comfort with their discharge. This group's survey will be printed in black and white and feature black and white graphics.
Black and White Printed Survey
This survey will feature black and white text and graphics.
Red Print
The survey concerns the patients' chest pain, perception of their safety, and their comfort with their discharge. This group's survey will be printed in red text and feature red graphics.
Red Printed Survey
This survey will feature red text and graphics.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Black and White Printed Survey
This survey will feature black and white text and graphics.
Red Printed Survey
This survey will feature red text and graphics.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to fill out the survey due to clinical instability, severe pain, or disorientation as determined by an emergency physician.
* Incarcerated patients.
* Patients who have a HEART score of \>3.
* Pregnant women.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CHRISTUS Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Matthew Vandermause, DO
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew Vandermause, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHRISTUS Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHRISTUS Health Spohn
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
The population studied will be a convenience sample of adult patients presenting to the ED with chest pain as a primary complaint who then are risk-stratified with the HEART score and are found to have a score of 3 or less.
Gerend, Mary, and Sias, Tricia.
majic, A., Merritt, S., Banister, C., and Blinebry, A. (2014).
Shi J, Zhang C, Jiang F. Does red undermine individuals' intellectual performance? A test in China. Int J Psychol. 2015 Feb;50(1):81-4. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12076. Epub 2014 May 5.
Mehta R, Zhu RJ. Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances. Science. 2009 Feb 27;323(5918):1226-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1169144. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
Lutfey KE, Eva KW, Gerstenberger E, Link CL, McKinlay JB. Physician cognitive processing as a source of diagnostic and treatment disparities in coronary heart disease: results of a factorial priming experiment. J Health Soc Behav. 2010 Mar;51(1):16-29. doi: 10.1177/0022146509361193.
Gorini A, Pravettoni G. An overview on cognitive aspects implicated in medical decisions. Eur J Intern Med. 2011 Dec;22(6):547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Blumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger H. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):539-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14547740. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.
Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Legare F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
Isaacs CG, Kistler C, Hunold KM, Pereira GF, Buchbinder M, Weaver MA, McLean SA, Platts-Mills TF. Shared decision-making in the selection of outpatient analgesics for older individuals in the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 May;61(5):793-8. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12207. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
Hess EP, Knoedler MA, Shah ND, Kline JA, Breslin M, Branda ME, Pencille LJ, Asplin BR, Nestler DM, Sadosty AT, Stiell IG, Ting HH, Montori VM. The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):251-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964791. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
Hess EP, Hollander JE, Schaffer JT, Kline JA, Torres CA, Diercks DB, Jones R, Owen KP, Meisel ZF, Demers M, Leblanc A, Shah ND, Inselman J, Herrin J, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Montori VM. Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trial. BMJ. 2016 Dec 5;355:i6165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6165.
Chen JC, Cooper RJ, Lopez-O'Sullivan A, Schriger DL. Measuring patient tolerance for future adverse events in low-risk emergency department chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;64(2):127-36, 136.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.12.025. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Neth Heart J. 2008 Jun;16(6):191-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03086144.
Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, Bosschaert MA, Mast EG, Mosterd A, Veldkamp RF, Wardeh AJ, Tio R, Braam R, Monnink SH, van Tooren R, Mast TP, van den Akker F, Cramer MJ, Poldervaart JM, Hoes AW, Doevendans PA. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.255. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-108
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.