Added Diagnostic Value of Point of Care Ultrasound in Acute Dyspnea

NCT ID: NCT05782478

Last Updated: 2025-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-09

Study Completion Date

2026-03-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dyspnea is a common diagnostic challenge in the Emergency Department (ED). Delay in diagnosis will increase time to correct treatment and could impact outcome. Previous studies have shown excellent diagnostic performance of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to detect and differentiate between several important diagnosis (e.g heart failure and pneumonia) in patients with dyspnea. However, in most studies POCUS is performed by physicians highly experienced in ultrasound and often studies have focused only on one or few diagnoses. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different diagnosis in dyspnoeic patients before and after a ED physician with limited training applies POCUS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dyspnoea is a common presenting complaint in the Emergency Department (ED). Dyspnoea requires timely evaluation and treatment as several conditions causing dyspnea are time critical.

Previous studies have suggested that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) increase diagnostic accuracy in the initial assessment of patients with dyspnoea. However, in most studies POCUS was done by highly experienced physicians which could limit the generalisability of POCUS in the hands of all emergency specialist and residents.

Aim To evaluate whether POCUS performed by a variety of emergency medicine physicians (specialists and residents) increase diagnostic accuracy in patients with dyspnea compared to routine assessment.

Method:

Specialist and residents in Emergency Medicine at the ED in Lund and Helsingborg (Sweden) will have a short training and certification in a structured dyspnea POCUS protocol. The protocol includes focused lung (8 or 14 zones), heart (subcostal, parasternal and apical four chamber views) and inferior vena cava ultrasound.

Study design Prospective observational study

Study population

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department within the highest or second highest triage category (Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System) and any of the following:

* Presenting with shortness of breath
* Oxygen saturation less than 90 % on room air
* Respiratory rate more than 25 breaths per minute and oxygen saturation less than 95 % on room air

Exclusion criteria

* Inclusion in the study will delay urgent interventions
* Patient is discharge from the ED (without hospital admission)

Patients will be included when a physician certified in the dyspnea POUCUS protocol is present in the ED (convenience sample) Firstly, an ED physician will assess the patient using available routine diagnostic procedures. After consent to the study, the physician will document the estimated likelihood (not likely, unlikely, likely, very likely) of the following diagnosis: heart failure, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), exacerbation of asthma, pleural or pericardial fluid. Clinical bedside tests will be available as in routine practice in the ED (e.g., ecg, blood gas results). A physician certified in the dyspnea protocol will then perform POCUS and deliver the findings to the initial physician assessing the patients. Hereafter, the initial physician documents the estimated likelihood of the above diagnosis being provided the ultrasound findings.

The estimated likelihoods (before and after POCUS) will be dichotomised and compared to the discharge diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of the diagnostic accuracy before and after adding POCUS will be calculated.

In addition to routine bed-side tests alle included patients will have the following ordered: chest imaging (x-ray or CT according to ED physicians' choice), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), C-reactive protein and white blood count.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dyspnea Hypoxia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Point of care Ultrasound according to study protocol

An emergency medicine specialist or resident will according to a structured protocol perform a structured ultrasound examination of the heart, the inferior vena cava and the lungs.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department within the highest or second highest triage category and any of the following

* Presenting with shortness of breath
* Oxygen saturation less than 90 % on room air
* Respiratory rate more than 25 breaths per minute and oxygen saturation less than 95 % on room air

Exclusion Criteria

* Inclusion in the study will delay urgent interventions
* Patient is discharge from the Emergency Department (without hospital admission)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Skane

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jakob Lundager Forberg, PhD,MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Region Skåne Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Helsingborg Hospital

Helsingborg, Skåne County, Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Emergency Medicine, Skåne University Hospital

Lund, Skåne County, Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jakob Lundager Forberg, PhD,MD

Role: CONTACT

0046424061000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jakob L Forberg, MD,PhD

Role: primary

Eric Dryver, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-02789-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.