Acute Heart Failure in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department with Acute Dyspnea: a Multimarker Approach Prognostic Study
NCT ID: NCT06692439
Last Updated: 2024-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
185 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-11-30
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Acute dyspnea is a frequent presenting symptom in emergency departments (ED), with acute heart failure (AHF) being the most common cause leading to hospitalization in elderly patients. AHF in this population presents unique challenges in diagnosis, management, and risk stratification. Current tools for severity assessment and risk stratification (NT-proBNP and echocardiography) have shown limited evolution over the past 20 years and remain insufficient, particularly for elderly patients who predominantly present with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines specifically call for research on biomarkers within a multi-marker strategy for AHF risk stratification.
Research Hypothesis:
The study hypothesizes that a combination of biomarkers (NT-proBNP, High-sensitivity Troponin I, ST2, Galectin-3, CD146 and suPAR) will provide prognostic value and effectively stratify risk for early outcomes (90-day mortality and hospital readmission) in patients aged ≥75 years presenting to the ED with acute dyspnea and diagnosed with AHF.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the prognostic value of six biomarkers, both individually and in combination, for predicting 90-day all-cause mortality or ED readmission in elderly patients (≥75 years) presenting with acute dyspnea and diagnosed with AHF.
Study Design:
This is a prospective prognostic study including patients from 7 emergency departments from university and non-university hospitals in France.
Study Population:
(I) Patients aged ≥75 years presenting to the ED with acute dyspnea meeting at least two criteria:
* Respiratory rate ≥25/min
* PaO2 ≤70 mmHg
* SpO2 ≤92% on room air
* PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg and pH ≤7.35
* Oxygen requirement
(ii) Have confirmed AHF diagnosis by two expert reviewers based on clinical data, laboratory results (excluding NT-proBNP), ECG, imaging, and specialized cardiac echo
Primary Endpoint:
Composite endpoint of 90-day all-cause mortality or ED readmission, as recommended by the ESC for evaluating early outcomes in AHF patients.
Analysis plan includes:
* ROC curves for optimal biomarker thresholds
* Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank tests
* Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses
* Bootstrap methods for confidence intervals
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Acute Heart Failure Study in Patients Admitted to Emergency Department for Dyspnea
NCT02835963
Multimarker Approach for Acute Dyspnea in Elderly Patients Admitted in the Emergency Department
NCT04240067
Impact of Validated Diagnostic Prediction Model of Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department
NCT01193998
Evaluation of Acute Cardiogenic Dyspnoea With Thorax Echography and Pro-BNP in the Emergency Department
NCT02122640
EndotyPIng PreHospitAl de Novo Acute hYpoxemic Respiratory Failure
NCT05150483
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
acute heart failure
The presence or absence of acute left heart failure (gold standard) was determined through diagnosis by two experts (a cardiologist and an emergency physician) based on:
1. Data collected in the ED and during hospitalization: Clinical examination and history, Current medications, Hemodynamic parameters, ECG, Chest X-ray, Emergency interventions, Clinical and paraclinical findings during hospitalization
2. Biological assays (excluding NT-proBNP)
3. Echocardiography performed by a cardiologist within 24 hours of admission, including: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Segmental wall motion, Presence of valvular disease, Transmitral flow, Tissue Doppler E' velocity
anticipated, n = 185/450 (41%)
No interventions assigned to this group
no acute heart failure
The presence or absence of acute left heart failure (gold standard) was determined through diagnosis by two experts (a cardiologist and an emergency physician) based on:
1. Data collected in the ED and during hospitalization: Clinical examination and history, Current medications, Hemodynamic parameters, ECG, Chest X-ray, Emergency interventions, Clinical and paraclinical findings during hospitalization
2. Biological assays (excluding NT-proBNP)
3. Echocardiography performed by a cardiologist within 24 hours of admission, including: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Segmental wall motion, Presence of valvular disease, Transmitral flow, Tissue Doppler E' velocity
anticipated, n = 265/450 (59%)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Respiratory rate ≥25/min
* PaO2 ≤70 mmHg
* SpO2 ≤92% on room air
* PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg and pH ≤7.35
* Oxygen requirement
2. Have confirmed AHF diagnosis by two expert reviewers based on clinical data, laboratory results (excluding NT-proBNP), ECG, imaging, and specialized cardiac echo
3. Provided written consent for data use in the READ-MA-PRONO study
Exclusion Criteria
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frédéric MAUNY, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
CHU Besançon
Marc PUYRAVEAU, MSc
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
CHU Besançon
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022/725
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.