Pharmacogenomics of GLP1 Receptor Agonists

NCT ID: NCT05762744

Last Updated: 2025-07-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-01

Study Completion Date

2022-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Healthy volunteers were recruited from the Old Order Amish population in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. After providing informed consent, research participants were screened for eligibility. The clinical trial was designed as a randomized crossover study in which participants underwent two frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests - one after receiving a subcutaneous injection of saline and one after receiving a subcutaneous injection of rapid-acting exenatide (BYETTA). The study sought to determine whether genetic variants are associated with the magnitude of the effect of exenatide. However, because the study fell far short of its recruitment targets, it was under-powered to evaluate genetic association. Thus, the data analysis focused on testing the hypothesis that the order of testing (whether the placebo FSIGT was conducted before the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT or whether the FSIGTs were conducted in the reverse order) does not alter the magnitude impact of exenatide on responses to a frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Healthy volunteers were recruited from the Old Order Amish population in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. After providing informed consent, research participants were screened for eligibility. The clinical trial was designed as a randomized crossover study in which participants underwent two frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests (FSIGT) - one after receiving a subcutaneous injection of saline and one after receiving a subcutaneous injection of rapid-acting exenatide (BYETTA). Based on data obtained from the FSIGT, participants' response to exenatide was assessed -- specifically, the effect of exenatide to enhance insulin secretion and accelerate metabolism of glucose. The study sought to determine whether genetic variants are associated with the magnitude of the effect of exenatide. However, because the study fell far short of its recruitment targets, it was under-powered to evaluate genetic association. Thus, the data analysis focused on testing the hypothesis that the order of testing (whether the placebo FSIGT was conducted before the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT or whether the FSIGTs were conducted in the reverse order) does not alter the magnitude impact of exenatide on responses to a frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Research participants all received the same two interventions (saline or exenatide) but the order of the interventions was randomized.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants were not informed whether the nurse was administering saline or exenatide injections.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exenatide followed by saline

Participants were randomized to receive exenatide 15 min before the first frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test and saline 15 min before the second frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test

Group Type OTHER

Exenatide Injection (before the first FSIGT)

Intervention Type DRUG

Nurses administered exenatide (5 mcg) subcutaneously 15 minutes prior to conducting the first frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.

In this crossover study, participants will also be "crossed over" to receive saline rather than exenatide: Nurses administered saline (0.2 mL) subcutaneously 15 minutes prior to conducting a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.

Saline followed by exenatide

Participants were randomized to receive saline15 min before the first frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test and exenatide15 min before the second frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test

Group Type OTHER

Exenatide injection before the second FSIGT)

Intervention Type DRUG

Nurses administered exenatide (5 mcg) subcutaneously 15 minutes prior to conducting the second frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exenatide Injection (before the first FSIGT)

Nurses administered exenatide (5 mcg) subcutaneously 15 minutes prior to conducting the first frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.

In this crossover study, participants will also be "crossed over" to receive saline rather than exenatide: Nurses administered saline (0.2 mL) subcutaneously 15 minutes prior to conducting a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.

Intervention Type DRUG

Exenatide injection before the second FSIGT)

Nurses administered exenatide (5 mcg) subcutaneously 15 minutes prior to conducting the second frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BYETTA Exenatide BYETTA Exenatide

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Member of the Old Order Amish community in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
* BMI: 18-40 kg/sq.m.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known allergy to exenatide
* History of diabetes, random glucose \>200 mg/dL, or HbA1c \> 6.5%
* Significant debilitating chronic cardiac, hepatic, pulmonary, or renal disease or other diseases that the investigator judges will make interpretation of the results difficult or increase the risk of participation
* Seizure disorder
* Pregnant by self-report or known pregnancy within 3 months of the start of study
* Currently breast feeding or breast feeding within 3 months of the start of the study
* Estimated glomerular filtration rate \<60 mL/min/1.73m2
* Hematocrit \<35%
* Liver function tests greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal
* Abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone
* History of pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer. Personal or family history of medullary carcinoma of the thyroid.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Maryland, Baltimore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Simeon I. Taylor

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simeon I Taylor, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amish Research Clinic

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Taylor SI, Montasser ME, Yuen AH, Fan H, Yazdi ZS, Whitlatch HB, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR, Muniyappa R, Streeten EA, Beitelshees AL. Acute pharmacodynamic responses to exenatide: Drug-induced increases in insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Sep;25(9):2586-2594. doi: 10.1111/dom.15143. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37264484 (View on PubMed)

Beitelshees AL, Streeten EA, Shahidzadeh Yazdi Z, Whitlatch HB, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR, Montasser ME, Taylor SI. Acute pharmacodynamic responses to sitagliptin: Drug-induced increase in early insulin secretion in oral glucose tolerance test. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May;17(5):e13809. doi: 10.1111/cts.13809.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38700326 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HP-00067574

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Incretins in Impaired Fasting Glucose
NCT00364377 COMPLETED PHASE4