Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pharmacogenomics of GLP1 Receptor Agonists (NCT NCT05762744)
NCT ID: NCT05762744
Last Updated: 2025-07-01
Results Overview
The ratio of the area-under-the-curve (AUC) for 1st phase insulin secretion in the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT divided by the AUC for 1st phase insulin secretion in the saline FSIGT.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
63 participants
0-10 minutes
2025-07-01
Participant Flow
Dates: June 2016 - November 2018 Site: Community-based recruitment at Amish Research Clinic, Lancaster Pennsylvania (Univ. of Maryland School of Medicine)
Participants were assigned to specific arms of the study based on the order in which they were randomized to a subcutaneous injection of either exenatide or normal saline solution: Arm 1: Exenatide followed by Normal Saline Arm 2: Normal Saline followed by Exenatide Frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests (FSIGT) were initiated 15 minutes after the subcutaneous injections of exenatide or normal saline. The second FSIGT was performed 5-28 days after the first FSIGT.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Exenatide Followed by Normal Saline
Of the 54 participants in our study, 26 individuals were randomized to receive exenatide 15 min before the first frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) and saline 15 min before the second FSIGT
|
Normal Saline Followed by Exenatide
Of the 54 participants in our study, 26 individuals were randomized to receive normal saline 15 min before the first frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) and exenatide 15 min before the second FSIGT
|
|---|---|---|
|
1st iv Glucose Tolerance Test
STARTED
|
31
|
32
|
|
1st iv Glucose Tolerance Test
COMPLETED
|
26
|
26
|
|
1st iv Glucose Tolerance Test
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
6
|
|
2nd iv Glucose Tolerance Test
STARTED
|
26
|
26
|
|
2nd iv Glucose Tolerance Test
COMPLETED
|
26
|
26
|
|
2nd iv Glucose Tolerance Test
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Exenatide Followed by Normal Saline
Of the 54 participants in our study, 26 individuals were randomized to receive exenatide 15 min before the first frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) and saline 15 min before the second FSIGT
|
Normal Saline Followed by Exenatide
Of the 54 participants in our study, 26 individuals were randomized to receive normal saline 15 min before the first frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) and exenatide 15 min before the second FSIGT
|
|---|---|---|
|
1st iv Glucose Tolerance Test
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
|
1st iv Glucose Tolerance Test
Some critical blood samples not collecte
|
5
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
Pharmacogenomics of GLP1 Receptor Agonists
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Normal Saline
n=26 Participants
Exenatide (5 mcg, sc) was injected 15 minutes before the first frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). After a washout period of 5-28 days, participants underwent a second FSIGT with saline (0.20 mL) being injected 15 min before the 2nd FSIGT.
|
Normal Saline Followed by Exenatide
n=26 Participants
Saline (0.2 mL) was injected 15 minutes before the first frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). After a washout period of 5-28 days, participants underwent a second FSIGT with exenatide (5 mcg) being injected 15 min before the 2nd FSIGT.
|
Total
n=52 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.2 Years
n=5 Participants
|
44.6 Years
n=7 Participants
|
47.3 Years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
28.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=5 Participants
|
27.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=7 Participants
|
28.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
|
5.6 Percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=5 Participants
|
5.5 Percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=7 Participants
|
5.5 Percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of participants homozygous for major alleles of both GCGR and GIPR
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of participants homozygous for p.G40S allele of GCGR
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of participants homozygous for p.E354Q allele of GIPR
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-10 minutesPopulation: The analysis population included 52 patients who completed the study and for whom the necessary blood samples were collected and available for assays of insulin and glucose.
The ratio of the area-under-the-curve (AUC) for 1st phase insulin secretion in the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT divided by the AUC for 1st phase insulin secretion in the saline FSIGT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Saline
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo exenatide-stimulated FSIGT first followed by saline FSIGT
|
Saline First Followed by Exenatide
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo the saline FSIGT followed by the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT
|
Homozygotes for the p.E354Q Allele of GIPR
Participants with two copies of the p.E354Q allele of the GIPR gene
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Exenatide Effect on First Phase Insulin Secretion
|
1.90 Ratio (no units)
Standard Error 0.17
|
2.18 Ratio (no units)
Standard Error 0.25
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 25-50 minutesPopulation: The analysis population included 52 patients who completed the study and for whom the necessary blood samples were collected and available for assays of insulin and glucose.
The ratio of the glucose disappearance rate (exenatide) divided by the glucose disappearance rate (placebo). Glucose disappearance rates were calculated as the slope of the plot of the logarithm of the glucose concentration as a function of time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Saline
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo exenatide-stimulated FSIGT first followed by saline FSIGT
|
Saline First Followed by Exenatide
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo the saline FSIGT followed by the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT
|
Homozygotes for the p.E354Q Allele of GIPR
Participants with two copies of the p.E354Q allele of the GIPR gene
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Exenatide Effect on Glucose Disappearance Rate
|
2.16 Ratio (no units)
Standard Error 0.19
|
2.28 Ratio (no units)
Standard Error 0.20
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 25-50 minutesPopulation: The analysis population included 52 patients who completed the study and for whom the necessary blood samples were collected and available for assays of insulin and glucose.
The slope of the line plotting the logarithm of glucose concentrations as a function of time during the exenatide frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. The slope of the line was estimated as the slope of the least-squares fit to the data points between 25-50 minutes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Saline
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo exenatide-stimulated FSIGT first followed by saline FSIGT
|
Saline First Followed by Exenatide
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo the saline FSIGT followed by the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT
|
Homozygotes for the p.E354Q Allele of GIPR
Participants with two copies of the p.E354Q allele of the GIPR gene
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Glucose Disappearance Rate (Exenatide)
|
1056 Log(mg/dL) per min
Standard Error 94
|
1131 Log(mg/dL) per min
Standard Error 81
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 25-50 minutesPopulation: The analysis population included 52 patients who completed the study and for whom the necessary blood samples were collected and available for assays of insulin and glucose.
The slope of the line plotting the logarithm of glucose concentrations as a function of time during the placebo frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. The slope of the line was estimated as the slope of the least-squares fit to the data points between 25-50 minutes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Saline
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo exenatide-stimulated FSIGT first followed by saline FSIGT
|
Saline First Followed by Exenatide
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo the saline FSIGT followed by the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT
|
Homozygotes for the p.E354Q Allele of GIPR
Participants with two copies of the p.E354Q allele of the GIPR gene
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Glucose Disappearance Rate (Placebo)
|
500 Log(mg/dL) per min
Standard Error 37
|
547 Log(mg/dL) per min
Standard Error 48
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-10 minutesPopulation: The analysis population included 52 patients who completed the study and for whom the necessary blood samples were collected and available for assays of insulin and glucose.
The area under the curve for plasma insulin levels during a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test after participants received exenatide
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Saline
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo exenatide-stimulated FSIGT first followed by saline FSIGT
|
Saline First Followed by Exenatide
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo the saline FSIGT followed by the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT
|
Homozygotes for the p.E354Q Allele of GIPR
Participants with two copies of the p.E354Q allele of the GIPR gene
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
First Phase Insulin Secretion (Exenatide)
|
561 microunits/mL*min
Standard Error 94
|
494 microunits/mL*min
Standard Error 50
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-10 minutesPopulation: The analysis population included 52 patients who completed the study and for whom the necessary blood samples were collected and available for assays of insulin and glucose.
The area under the curve for plasma insulin levels during a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test after participants received saline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Saline
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo exenatide-stimulated FSIGT first followed by saline FSIGT
|
Saline First Followed by Exenatide
n=26 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo the saline FSIGT followed by the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT
|
Homozygotes for the p.E354Q Allele of GIPR
Participants with two copies of the p.E354Q allele of the GIPR gene
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
First Phase Insulin Secretion (Placebo)
|
305 microunits/mL*min
Standard Error 38
|
254 microunits/mL*min
Standard Error 23
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 - 10 min during the FSIGTPopulation: Participants with the specified genotypes. Based on the observation that the order of FSIGT (exenatide-first versus saline-first) did not affect the data obtained in the FSIGT, we have pooled data from the two arms of the study (exenatide-first and saline-first).
The effect of exenatide to increase first-phase insulin secretion was defined as the ratio of area-under-the-curve (AUC) for insulin levels during the first 10 minutes of the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT divided by the AUC for first phase insulin secretion during the saline FSIGT..
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Saline
n=19 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo exenatide-stimulated FSIGT first followed by saline FSIGT
|
Saline First Followed by Exenatide
n=20 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo the saline FSIGT followed by the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT
|
Homozygotes for the p.E354Q Allele of GIPR
n=13 Participants
Participants with two copies of the p.E354Q allele of the GIPR gene
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Drug Effect on First-Phase Insulin Secretion (Genotype-specific)
|
2.25 Ratio: no units
Standard Error 0.31
|
1.94 Ratio: no units
Standard Error 0.21
|
1.87 Ratio: no units
Standard Error 0.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 25-50 min during the FSIGTPopulation: Same as for effect of exenatide on first phase insulin secretion
The rate of glucose disappearance was calculated as the slope of a least-squared line fitted to the logarithms of glucose concentrations during time 25-50 min of FSIGTs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exenatide First Followed by Saline
n=19 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo exenatide-stimulated FSIGT first followed by saline FSIGT
|
Saline First Followed by Exenatide
n=20 Participants
Participants who were randomized to undergo the saline FSIGT followed by the exenatide-stimulated FSIGT
|
Homozygotes for the p.E354Q Allele of GIPR
n=13 Participants
Participants with two copies of the p.E354Q allele of the GIPR gene
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Exenatide's Effect on the Rate of Glucose-disappearance (Genotype Specific)
|
2.19 Log(mg/dL) per min
Standard Error 0.24
|
2.28 Log(mg/dL) per min
Standard Error 0.24
|
2.18 Log(mg/dL) per min
Standard Error 0.19
|
Adverse Events
Total Study Population (Control Study)
Total Study Population (Exenatide Study)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Total Study Population (Control Study)
n=62 participants at risk
The analysis is based on observations during the control studies in the 62 individuals who completed the control intravenous glucose tolerance testing. We report the adverse events separately for the control studies versus the exenatide studies because the literature documents the fact that GLP1R agonists like exenatide frequently induce nausea and/or vomiting.
|
Total Study Population (Exenatide Study)
n=62 participants at risk
The analysis is based on observations during the control studies in the 62 individuals who completed exenatide intravenous glucose tolerance testing. We report the adverse events separately for the control studies versus the exenatide studies because the literature documents the fact that GLP1R agonists like exenatide frequently induce nausea and/or vomiting.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea or vomiting
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were assessed during the time (one day) participants were in the clinic for the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test
Participants were interviewed by nursing staff on the day of the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.
|
4.8%
3/62 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were assessed during the time (one day) participants were in the clinic for the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test
Participants were interviewed by nursing staff on the day of the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Headache
|
3.2%
2/62 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were assessed during the time (one day) participants were in the clinic for the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test
Participants were interviewed by nursing staff on the day of the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.
|
6.5%
4/62 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were assessed during the time (one day) participants were in the clinic for the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test
Participants were interviewed by nursing staff on the day of the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.
|
Additional Information
Simeon Taylor, MD, PhD (Professor of Medicine0
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place