Comparison of Fasiglifam (TAK-875) to Placebo and Sitagliptin in Combination With Metformin in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT01549964
Last Updated: 2016-06-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
916 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-30
2014-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Fasiglifam (TAK-875) With Sitagliptin When Used in Combination With Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01834274
TAK-875 (Fasiglifam) in Combination With Sitagliptin in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01829464
Efficacy and Safety of TAK-875 in Combination With Sitagliptin in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01414920
Efficacy and Safety of Lobeglitazone Versus Sitagliptin
NCT02480465
Phase 2 Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Investigational Drug - PF04937319 In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01475461
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will evaluate the efficacy of TAK-875 (25 mg and 50 mg) plus metformin compared to placebo plus metformin and sitagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control as measured by change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) over a 24-week Treatment Period. Participants completing the 24-week Treatment Period may enter an optional 80-week extension period for a total of 104 weeks of treatment.
Due to concerns about potential liver safety, on balance, the benefits of treating patients with fasiglifam (TAK-875) do not outweigh the potential risks.
For this reason, Takeda has decided voluntarily to terminate the development activities for fasiglifam.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fasiglifam (TAK-875) 25 mg
Fasiglifam 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) needs to continue at a stable dose.
Fasiglifam (TAK-875)
Fasiglifam (TAK-875) tablets
Fasiglifam (TAK-875) 50 mg
Fasiglifam 50 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) needs to continue at a stable dose.
Fasiglifam (TAK-875)
Fasiglifam (TAK-875) tablets
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Sitagliptin 100 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. TAK-875 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) needs to continue at a stable dose.
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin tablets
Placebo
Fasiglifam (TAK-875) placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) needs to continue at a stable dose.
Placebo
Placebo-matching tablets
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fasiglifam (TAK-875)
Fasiglifam (TAK-875) tablets
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin tablets
Placebo
Placebo-matching tablets
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The participant meets one of the following criteria:
1. The participant has an HbA1c level ≥7.5 and \<10.5%, and has been on a stable daily dose of ≥1500 mg (or documented maximum tolerated dose \[MTD\]) of metformin for at least 2 months prior to Screening. This participant will immediately enter the Placebo Run-in Period according to Study Schedule A, or;
2. The participant has an HbA1c level ≥7.5 and \<10.5%, and has been on a stable daily dose of \<1500 mg of metformin without documented MTD for at least 2 months prior to Screening. After completing the Screening Visit, this participant will have their metformin dose immediately increased to ≥1500 mg (or MTD) for an 8-week Titration Period according to Study Schedule B. Following this 8-week period, the participant must qualify for entry into the Placebo Run-in Period by completing the Week -3 procedures including having an HbA1c level ≥7.5 and \<10.5%.
3. The participant has had no treatment with antidiabetic agents other than metformin within 2 months prior to Screening (Exception: if a participant has received other antidiabetic therapy for ≤7 days within the 2 months prior to Screening).
4. The participant has a body mass index (BMI) ≤45 kg/m² at Screening.
5. Participants regularly using other, non-excluded medications, must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. However, PRN (as needed) use of prescription or over-the-counter medications is allowed at the discretion of the investigator.
6. The participant is able and willing to monitor glucose with a home glucose monitor and consistently record his or her own blood glucose concentrations and complete subject diaries.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL (≤120 g/L) for males and ≤10 g/dL (≤100 g/L) for females at Screening Visit.
3. The participant has systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ≥95 mm Hg at Screening Visit. (If the participant meets this exclusion criterion, the assessment may be repeated once at least 30 minutes after the initial measurement.)
4. The participant has a history of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
5. The participant has had treatment for gastric banding or gastric bypass surgery within one year prior to Screening.
6. The participant had coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, clinically significant abnormal ECG, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior to or at Screening.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Takeda
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Senior Medical Director Clinical Science
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Takeda
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Chula Vista, California, United States
El Cajon, California, United States
La Mesa, California, United States
Laguna Hills, California, United States
National City, California, United States
Paramount, California, United States
San Diego, California, United States
Stockton, California, United States
Tustin, California, United States
West Hills, California, United States
Trumbull, Connecticut, United States
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
Ocala, Florida, United States
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Meridian, Idaho, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Greenfield, Indiana, United States
Muncie, Indiana, United States
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Owensboro, Kentucky, United States
Hyattsville, Maryland, United States
Troy, Michigan, United States
Picayune, Mississippi, United States
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Haddon Heights, New Jersey, United States
Rosedale, New York, United States
Calabash, North Carolina, United States
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Monroe, North Carolina, United States
Morehead City, North Carolina, United States
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Norman, Oklahoma, United States
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Crossville, Tennessee, United States
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Carrollton, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
Irving, Texas, United States
Katy, Texas, United States
McKinney, Texas, United States
Plano, Texas, United States
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Spring, Texas, United States
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
West Jordan, Utah, United States
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Maroubra, New South Wales, Australia
Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Daw Park, South Australia, Australia
Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Byala, , Bulgaria
Kazanlak, , Bulgaria
Plovdiv, , Bulgaria
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Čakovec, , Croatia
Karlovac, , Croatia
Krapinske Toplice, , Croatia
Rijeka, , Croatia
Slavonski Brod, , Croatia
Split, , Croatia
Zadar, , Croatia
Zagreb, , Croatia
Beroun, , Czechia
Brno, , Czechia
Havlíčkův Brod, , Czechia
Kladno, , Czechia
Kroměříž, , Czechia
Mladá Boleslav, , Czechia
Ostrava, , Czechia
Ostrava - Moravska Ostrava, , Czechia
Pardubice, , Czechia
Pilsen, , Czechia
Písek, , Czechia
Prague, , Czechia
Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia
Baja, , Hungary
Balatonfüred, , Hungary
Budaörs, , Hungary
Budapest, , Hungary
Debrecen, , Hungary
Eger, , Hungary
Gödöllő, , Hungary
Gyöngyös, , Hungary
Gyula, , Hungary
Hódmezővásárhely, , Hungary
Kecskemét, , Hungary
Kistelek, , Hungary
Kisvárda, , Hungary
Komárom, , Hungary
Mohács, , Hungary
Nyíregyháza, , Hungary
Pécs, , Hungary
Szeged, , Hungary
Szekszárd, , Hungary
Szikszó, , Hungary
Szolnok, , Hungary
Szombathely, , Hungary
Úrhida, , Hungary
Veszprém, , Hungary
Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary
Florence, Firenze, Italy
Milan, Milano, Italy
Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy
Pavia, Pavia, Italy
Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
Alor Star, Kedah, Malaysia
Kelantan, Kelantan, Malaysia
Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia
Bardejov, , Slovakia
Bratislava, , Slovakia
Kosice - Saca, , Slovakia
Košice, , Slovakia
Levice, , Slovakia
Lučenec, , Slovakia
Moldava nad Bodvou, , Slovakia
Nitra, , Slovakia
Pezinok, , Slovakia
Prešov, , Slovakia
Prievidza, , Slovakia
Stropkov, , Slovakia
Svidník, , Slovakia
Šahy, , Slovakia
Štúrovo, , Slovakia
Trebišov, , Slovakia
Trenčín, , Slovakia
Žilina, , Slovakia
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Incheon, , South Korea
Seoul, , South Korea
Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand
Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
Rachathevi, Bangkok, Thailand
Rajtevi, Bangkok, Thailand
Ratchathewi, Bangkok, Thailand
Khon Kaen, Changwat Khon Kaen, Thailand
Muang, Changwat Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, Thailand
Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shavadia JS, Sharma A, Gu X, Neaton J, DeLeve L, Holmes D, Home P, Eckel RH, Watkins PB, Granger CB. Determination of fasiglifam-induced liver toxicity: Insights from the data monitoring committee of the fasiglifam clinical trials program. Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):253-262. doi: 10.1177/1740774519836766. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-001752-10
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
U1111-1124-2225
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NMRR-12-446-11314
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
TAK-875_302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.