Comparison of Fasiglifam (TAK-875) to Placebo and Sitagliptin in Combination With Metformin in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01549964

Last Updated: 2016-06-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

916 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 2 doses of TAK-875 (25 mg and 50 mg), once daily (QD), plus metformin compared to placebo plus metformin and sitagliptin plus metformin on lowering blood sugar.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

TAK-875 is being developed at Takeda Development Center, Inc. as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) whose blood glucose level is inadequately controlled with metformin.

This study will evaluate the efficacy of TAK-875 (25 mg and 50 mg) plus metformin compared to placebo plus metformin and sitagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control as measured by change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) over a 24-week Treatment Period. Participants completing the 24-week Treatment Period may enter an optional 80-week extension period for a total of 104 weeks of treatment.

Due to concerns about potential liver safety, on balance, the benefits of treating patients with fasiglifam (TAK-875) do not outweigh the potential risks.

For this reason, Takeda has decided voluntarily to terminate the development activities for fasiglifam.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glycemic Control

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) 25 mg

Fasiglifam 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) needs to continue at a stable dose.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fasiglifam (TAK-875)

Intervention Type DRUG

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) tablets

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) 50 mg

Fasiglifam 50 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) needs to continue at a stable dose.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fasiglifam (TAK-875)

Intervention Type DRUG

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) tablets

Sitagliptin 100 mg

Sitagliptin 100 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. TAK-875 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) needs to continue at a stable dose.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sitagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Sitagliptin tablets

Placebo

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for a 24-week Treatment Period followed by an optional 80-week extension period for up to 104 weeks of treatment. Metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) needs to continue at a stable dose.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo-matching tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fasiglifam (TAK-875)

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Sitagliptin

Sitagliptin tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo-matching tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Januvia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The participant is male or female and 18 years of age or older with a historical diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus.
2. The participant meets one of the following criteria:

1. The participant has an HbA1c level ≥7.5 and \<10.5%, and has been on a stable daily dose of ≥1500 mg (or documented maximum tolerated dose \[MTD\]) of metformin for at least 2 months prior to Screening. This participant will immediately enter the Placebo Run-in Period according to Study Schedule A, or;
2. The participant has an HbA1c level ≥7.5 and \<10.5%, and has been on a stable daily dose of \<1500 mg of metformin without documented MTD for at least 2 months prior to Screening. After completing the Screening Visit, this participant will have their metformin dose immediately increased to ≥1500 mg (or MTD) for an 8-week Titration Period according to Study Schedule B. Following this 8-week period, the participant must qualify for entry into the Placebo Run-in Period by completing the Week -3 procedures including having an HbA1c level ≥7.5 and \<10.5%.
3. The participant has had no treatment with antidiabetic agents other than metformin within 2 months prior to Screening (Exception: if a participant has received other antidiabetic therapy for ≤7 days within the 2 months prior to Screening).
4. The participant has a body mass index (BMI) ≤45 kg/m² at Screening.
5. Participants regularly using other, non-excluded medications, must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. However, PRN (as needed) use of prescription or over-the-counter medications is allowed at the discretion of the investigator.
6. The participant is able and willing to monitor glucose with a home glucose monitor and consistently record his or her own blood glucose concentrations and complete subject diaries.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The participant donated or received any blood products within 12 weeks prior to Screening or is planning to donate blood during the study.
2. Hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL (≤120 g/L) for males and ≤10 g/dL (≤100 g/L) for females at Screening Visit.
3. The participant has systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ≥95 mm Hg at Screening Visit. (If the participant meets this exclusion criterion, the assessment may be repeated once at least 30 minutes after the initial measurement.)
4. The participant has a history of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
5. The participant has had treatment for gastric banding or gastric bypass surgery within one year prior to Screening.
6. The participant had coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, clinically significant abnormal ECG, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior to or at Screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Senior Medical Director Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

El Cajon, California, United States

Site Status

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Paramount, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Stockton, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

West Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Trumbull, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Greenfield, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Muncie, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Hyattsville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Haddon Heights, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Rosedale, New York, United States

Site Status

Calabash, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Monroe, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Crossville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Irving, Texas, United States

Site Status

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

McKinney, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Spring, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Maroubra, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Daw Park, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Byala, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Kazanlak, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Čakovec, , Croatia

Site Status

Karlovac, , Croatia

Site Status

Krapinske Toplice, , Croatia

Site Status

Rijeka, , Croatia

Site Status

Slavonski Brod, , Croatia

Site Status

Split, , Croatia

Site Status

Zadar, , Croatia

Site Status

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Beroun, , Czechia

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Havlíčkův Brod, , Czechia

Site Status

Kladno, , Czechia

Site Status

Kroměříž, , Czechia

Site Status

Mladá Boleslav, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava - Moravska Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Písek, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Baja, , Hungary

Site Status

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

Budaörs, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Gödöllő, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyöngyös, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Hódmezővásárhely, , Hungary

Site Status

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Kistelek, , Hungary

Site Status

Kisvárda, , Hungary

Site Status

Komárom, , Hungary

Site Status

Mohács, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Szikszó, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Úrhida, , Hungary

Site Status

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Florence, Firenze, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Site Status

Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

Site Status

Alor Star, Kedah, Malaysia

Site Status

Kelantan, Kelantan, Malaysia

Site Status

Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia

Site Status

Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Site Status

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bardejov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Kosice - Saca, , Slovakia

Site Status

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Levice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Lučenec, , Slovakia

Site Status

Moldava nad Bodvou, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Pezinok, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prievidza, , Slovakia

Site Status

Stropkov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Svidník, , Slovakia

Site Status

Šahy, , Slovakia

Site Status

Štúrovo, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trebišov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Rachathevi, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Rajtevi, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Ratchathewi, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, Changwat Khon Kaen, Thailand

Site Status

Muang, Changwat Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

Site Status

Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, Thailand

Site Status

Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Bulgaria Croatia Czechia Hungary Italy Malaysia Slovakia South Korea Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shavadia JS, Sharma A, Gu X, Neaton J, DeLeve L, Holmes D, Home P, Eckel RH, Watkins PB, Granger CB. Determination of fasiglifam-induced liver toxicity: Insights from the data monitoring committee of the fasiglifam clinical trials program. Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):253-262. doi: 10.1177/1740774519836766. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30880443 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-001752-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1124-2225

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NMRR-12-446-11314

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TAK-875_302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.