Quality of Medical History Taking and Diagnostic Accuracy

NCT ID: NCT05760859

Last Updated: 2023-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

198 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomized simulator-based single-blind trial aimed to investigate the effects of initial cues and history taking skills on diagnostic accuracy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diagnostic errors are a relevant health-care problem. As medical history taking is usually the first step in a patient's assessment its quality is most likely a first and important barrier against diagnostic errors. There are, however, only limited data on the association of the quality of medical history taking and diagnostic accuracy.This prospective randomized simulator-based single-blind trial aimed to investigate the effects of initial cues and history taking skills on diagnostic accuracy. 198 medical students (135 females) were given the task to assess a patient presenting with simulated acute pulmonary embolism. Participants were randomized to six versions of the scenario differing only in the initial cues, i.e. in the reply of the patient to the initial question about the reason for his visit. In three of six versions, initial cues were restricted to thoracic symptoms (chest pain, dyspnoea, or combination of both). In the remaining three versions, initial cues consisted of thoracic and extra-thoracic (leg pain, immobilization) symptoms. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. The mannequin was equipped with a speaker in its head that broadcasts the voice of a remote operator (experienced physician) allowing verbal interaction of the participants with the "patient". The "patient" did not speak unless asked and responded to all participants' questions during history taking according to a pre-defined checklist.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diagnostic Error

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants were randomized (computer-generated numbers) to six versions of a simulated scenario of pulmonary embolism. The six versions differed only in the initial cues, i.e. in the reply of the patient to the initial question about the reason for his visit.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Single-blind trial; participants not aware of the goal of the study

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chest pain

Patient answers the initial question of history taking on why he had come to the hospital with "Chest pain"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Initial cue

Intervention Type OTHER

Symptom volunteered by the "patient"

Dyspnoea

Patient answers the initial question of history taking on why he had come to the hospital with "Dyspnoea"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Initial cue

Intervention Type OTHER

Symptom volunteered by the "patient"

Chest pain AND Dyspnoea

Patient answers the initial question of history taking on why he had come to the hospital with "Chest pain, and Dyspnoea"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Initial cue

Intervention Type OTHER

Symptom volunteered by the "patient"

Chest pain AND dyspnoea, AND leg pain

Patient answers the initial question of history taking on why he had come to the hospital with "Chest pain, and Dyspnoea, and leg pain"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Initial cue

Intervention Type OTHER

Symptom volunteered by the "patient"

Chest pain AND dyspnoea, AND immobilization

Patient answers the initial question of history taking on why he had come to the hospital with "Chest pain, and Dyspnoea, and immobilization"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Initial cue

Intervention Type OTHER

Symptom volunteered by the "patient"

Chest pain AND dyspnoea, AND leg pain AND immobilization

Patient answers the initial question of history taking on why he had come to the hospital with "Chest pain, and Dyspnoea, and leg pain, and immobilization"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Initial cue

Intervention Type OTHER

Symptom volunteered by the "patient"

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Initial cue

Symptom volunteered by the "patient"

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 4th year medical students participating in voluntary simulator-based workshops

Exclusion Criteria

* decline to give written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephan Marsch, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital of Basel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital

Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4031_Sim_MedHistory

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.