Assessment of "Gut Feelings" Accuracy Regarding the Effect of Professional Experience in General Practitioners in Clinical Decision Making

NCT ID: NCT05175157

Last Updated: 2022-05-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

260 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-28

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Knowledge, experience and professional development limit the risk of diagnostic error for the clinician in daily practice. However, research has shown that other non-analytical factors are involved in clinical decision making. Intuition (or "gut feelings") is a subjective element involved in medical decision-making, and its place and relevance are being explored. The concept of "gut feelings" comes from General Practitioners (GPs) themselves and their description of their own practice. Several studies have shown its place in medical decision-making models, particularly in the face of diagnostic uncertainty.

A questionnaire used as a standardized measurement tool for gut feelings was created to address this issue. The Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been translated into French, German and Polish during a standardized linguistic validation procedure. It is currently validated and available in five languages. The QGF has been tested and validated in clinical practice by Belgian, French and Dutch physicians. Its feasibility has been evaluated in these three health systems.

The Gut Feelings Questionnaire was used in a prospective study to determine the accuracy of the sense of alarm in patients consulting their GP for chest pain and/or dyspnea. But the role of the practitioner's experience has not been studied: is the gut feeling more accurate in experienced GPs than in first semester interns in general practice?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gut Feelings

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

General practitioner

Answer the Gut Fellings questionnaire

Gut Fellings questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Answer the Gut Fellings questionnaire

Internal

Answer the Gut Fellings questionnaire

Gut Fellings questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Answer the Gut Fellings questionnaire

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gut Fellings questionnaire

Answer the Gut Fellings questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- GP population: General practitioners established for more than 3 years

\- Intern population: Interns in general medicine in the first year of the third cycle of the diploma of specialized studies in general medicine

Exclusion Criteria

\- For the 2 populations: Refusal to participate

\- Intern population: Interns in the second and third year of the diploma of specialized studies in general medicine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Brest

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr Marie BARAIS

Brest, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marie Barais

Role: CONTACT

06 98 18 96 81

Matthieu Schuers

Role: CONTACT

06 47 00 86 41

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marie BARAIS, Dr

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

29BRC21.0359 (EGFGP)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Post-Hoc Enthusiasm and Wariness
NCT05686889 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Confirming And Notifying Death
NCT06910176 RECRUITING