Educational Intervention to Increase Physician Satisfaction and Effectiveness With a New Electronic Health Record

NCT ID: NCT02015702

Last Updated: 2021-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-01-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was intended to test the effects of adding a one-on-one educational intervention taught by a physician to a physician during their clinical work to improve their acceptance and satisfaction with a new inpatient electronic health record and ordering system.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was a randomized, parallel , non- blinded controlled trial of real-time, focused educational interventions in an intervention arm compared with usual training and support in the control arm. Improvement in performance, defined as the time between opening and closing a progress note, and number of notes completed after shift , were the primary outcomes. Physician satisfaction was a secondary outcome. Participants from one 550-bed Academic Independent Medical Center were invited to participate if they were full-time hospitalists or residents in internal medicine with no prior experience with the EPIC electronic health record.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Attitude of Health Personnel

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

One-on-one physician training

One-on-one physician training Physicians in the experimental arm were visited by a instructing physician at a computer while performing clinical duties who had observed others to identify best practices. Instructors watched subjects' work, looking for a specific tip that could be applied to the current work, then demonstrated the tip, and answered any questions the subject had about using or applying this new technique .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

One-on-one physician training

Intervention Type OTHER

Physicians in the experimental arm were visited by a instructing physician at a computer while performing clinical duties who had observed others to identify best practices. Instructors watched subjects' work, looking for a specific tip that could be applied to the current work, then demonstrated the tip, and answered any questions the subject had about using or applying this new technique .

Usual training

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual training included online e-modules, 12 hours of classroom time, practice in the EPIC Playground, user acceptability training classes,non-physician technical support on all of the floors, and a physician-only help line.

Usual training

Usual training. This group will get the usual specified training for learning to use our electronic health record. Both groups received 12 hours of EPIC classroom training, exposure to the EPIC e-learning modules, user acceptability testing classes, and unlimited time on the EPIC 'playground', a site to practice on virtual patients. All had 90 days of elbow support with an EPIC-training non-physician technician, who were visible and available on all inpatient wards, as well as access to a physician-only support line available at all hours.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual training

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual training included online e-modules, 12 hours of classroom time, practice in the EPIC Playground, user acceptability training classes,non-physician technical support on all of the floors, and a physician-only help line.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

One-on-one physician training

Physicians in the experimental arm were visited by a instructing physician at a computer while performing clinical duties who had observed others to identify best practices. Instructors watched subjects' work, looking for a specific tip that could be applied to the current work, then demonstrated the tip, and answered any questions the subject had about using or applying this new technique .

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual training

Usual training included online e-modules, 12 hours of classroom time, practice in the EPIC Playground, user acceptability training classes,non-physician technical support on all of the floors, and a physician-only help line.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Internal Medicine physicians and resident physicians with inpatient clinical duties at the time of the EPIC electronic health record go-live (Feb 4, 2013)

Exclusion Criteria

* Physicians whose duties did not include regular admissions and discharge of patients
* Physicians whose work was limited to teaching
* Physicians with prior experience in using EPIC systems for inpatient care .
* Physician assistants and nurse practitioners
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Reading Hospital and Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leena Jalota, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Reading Health System

Anthony A Donato, MD MHPE

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Reading Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Reading Health System

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ReadingHMC-IRB-045-12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Improving Patient-centered Care Using an Inventory
NCT01843803 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
CKD Report Card Pilot Trial
NCT04119570 COMPLETED NA