Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Bisphenol-A Levels in Patients With Fixed Lingual, Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers
NCT ID: NCT05738889
Last Updated: 2023-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-07-28
2022-12-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study method and data collection techniques: In this study, individuals will be selected from the patients who will be treated at Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics between July 2021 and July 2022, whose orthodontic treatment will be completed. These patients will be randomly divided into four groups according to the type of retention appliance to be chosen: those who are applied a fixed lingual retainer with a bis-GMA-containing composite, those with a fixed lingual retainer with a bis-GMA-free composite, those with an vacuum formed retainers, and those with a hawley retainers. After the debonding of the fixed attachments at the end of the treatment appointment, the retention appliances will be applied 1 day later so that BPA, which is released from the resin adhesives used to bond the attachments, does not affect the study data. Saliva samples will be taken from the patients before the appliance is inserted, 1 hour, 7 days and 30 days after the appliance is inserted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444
Comparison of the Effect of Two Types of Fixed Retainers on the Health of the Gums
NCT01314729
Assessment of Bacterial Loads of Essix Retainers in Patients Under Retention Therapy
NCT04871763
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574
Clinical Effectiveness of Bonded Versus Vacuum-formed Retainers
NCT04847323
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1: Patients with fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA containing composite
In the maxilla and mandible, the lingual surfaces of the anterior six teeth, including the canines, were roughened and bonded by applying 37.5% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds. Then, the retainer wire was adhered to the lingual surfaces of the teeth between the canine-canines in the maxilla and mandible, where a fixed lingual retainer will be applied, with a flowable composite adhesive containing Bis-GMA, with 10 seconds of illumination for 60 seconds for each tooth.
Fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA containing composite
Bonding materials of fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA containing composite
Group 2: Patients with fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA-free composite
The lingual surfaces of the anterior six teeth, including the canines, in the maxilla and mandible were roughened by the application of 37.5% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds. Since the applied composite system is one-stage, no additional bond application was done. Fixed lingual retainer wire was applied with a Bis-GMA-free flowable composite adhesive with 60 seconds exposure for 10 seconds for each tooth.
Fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA-free composite
Bonding materials of fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA-free composite
Group 3: Patients with vacuum-formed retainers
Impressions were taken with alginate impression material from the maxilla and mandible of the volunteers whose treatment was completed, and a model was obtained with a hard cast. On the models obtained, vacuum formed retainers were prepared with a vacuum forming machine. The use and care instructions of vacuum formed retainers were explained to the patient orally. vacuum formed retainers were used by the patient for 22 hours.
Vacuum-formed retainers
vacuum-forming machine and vacuum formed plates
Group 4: Patients with hawley retainers
Impressions were taken with alginate impression material from the volunteers in the Hawley retainers group and a model was obtained with hard plaster. Wire elements were made on the model obtained and the appliance was prepared from transparent acrylic material. After the leveling and polishing processes were completed, the hawley retainers was attached to the mouth. It is stated that the appliance is used for 22 hours in 1 day. The use and care instructions of the Hawley retainers are explained to the patient.
Hawley retainers
Acrylic based hawley retainers
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA containing composite
Bonding materials of fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA containing composite
Fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA-free composite
Bonding materials of fixed lingual retainers applied with Bis-GMA-free composite
Vacuum-formed retainers
vacuum-forming machine and vacuum formed plates
Hawley retainers
Acrylic based hawley retainers
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* absence of any systemic disease
* good oral hygiene
* completion of orthodontic treatment
* non smoker
* Not working in jobs where they will be exposed to chronic BPA release, such as gas station construction site or acrylic related jobs
Exclusion Criteria
* any systemic disease
* poor oral hygiene
* ıncomplete orthodontic treatment
* being a smoker
* working in jobs where they will e exposed to chronic BPA release, such as gas station construction site or acrylic related jobs
10 Years
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
YAZGI AY UNUVAR, PhD
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry
Aydin, Efeler, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Raghavan AS, Pottipalli Sathyanarayana H, Kailasam V, Padmanabhan S. Comparative evaluation of salivary bisphenol A levels in patients wearing vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: An in-vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Mar;151(3):471-476. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.022.
Manoj MK, Ramakrishnan R, Babjee S, Nasim R. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of salivary bisphenol A levels from light-cured and chemically cured orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Dec;154(6):803-808. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.02.008.
Eliades T, Voutsa D, Sifakakis I, Makou M, Katsaros C. Release of bisphenol-A from a light-cured adhesive bonded to lingual fixed retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Feb;139(2):192-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.026.
Sasaki N, Okuda K, Kato T, Kakishima H, Okuma H, Abe K, Tachino H, Tuchida K, Kubono K. Salivary bisphenol-A levels detected by ELISA after restoration with composite resin. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005 Apr;16(4):297-300. doi: 10.1007/s10856-005-0627-8.
Kang YG, Kim JY, Kim J, Won PJ, Nam JH. Release of bisphenol A from resin composite used to bond orthodontic lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):779-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.022.
Eliades T, Hiskia A, Eliades G, Athanasiou AE. Assessment of bisphenol-A release from orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.013.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DHF-21010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.