Effect of Different Fixed Lingual Retainers on Tooth Stability
NCT ID: NCT06284499
Last Updated: 2024-02-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-16
2023-10-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Materials and methods: A total of 82 patients (43 females and 39 males; mean age = 18.61 ± 3.71 years) with no missing teeth in the lower inter-canine region were treated with fixed orthodontic mechanics. At the completion of the orthodontic treatment, each patient was fitted with either Ortho FlexTech (Reliance; Group I), dead soft 8-braided (Bond-A-Braid, Reliance; Group II), or 5-stranded (PentaOne, Masel; Group III) LR wire. A control group consisting of people with a healthy periodontal condition and no bone loss was included (Control; Group C). The mobility of the lower anterior teeth on the right and left sides was measured using a Periotest® device before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 10 months after (T2) the application of the LR. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc LSD, repeated ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, and Pearson χ2 tests.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Removable Retainers
NCT05854953
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493
The Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Fixed Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT05926934
Stability of Maxillary Anterior Teeth After Two Years of Retention in Adolescents Comparing Two Bonded and a Vacuum-formed Retainer
NCT04616755
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Group 1 (n = 31), which contained patients fitted with 0.038 × 0.016" stainless steel wire (Ortho FlexTech® chain, Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, IL, USA)
measuring tooth stability after orthodontic treatment using a Periotest® device.
The tooth mobility was determined by taking three repeat measurements from each tooth and calculating the average of these measurements, using a Periotest® device.
Group 2
Group 2 (n = 23), which contained patients fitted with 0.010 × 0.026" 8-braided dead soft wire (Bond-A-Braid,Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, IL, USA)
measuring tooth stability after orthodontic treatment using a Periotest® device.
The tooth mobility was determined by taking three repeat measurements from each tooth and calculating the average of these measurements, using a Periotest® device.
Group 3
Group 3 (n = 28), which contained patients fitted with 0.0215" 5-stranded stainless steel wire (Penta-One®, Masel Orthodontics, Carlsbad, CA, USA)
measuring tooth stability after orthodontic treatment using a Periotest® device.
The tooth mobility was determined by taking three repeat measurements from each tooth and calculating the average of these measurements, using a Periotest® device.
Control group
Control group (n = 20), which contained individuals who had not received any orthodontic treatment
measuring tooth stability after orthodontic treatment using a Periotest® device.
The tooth mobility was determined by taking three repeat measurements from each tooth and calculating the average of these measurements, using a Periotest® device.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
measuring tooth stability after orthodontic treatment using a Periotest® device.
The tooth mobility was determined by taking three repeat measurements from each tooth and calculating the average of these measurements, using a Periotest® device.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances of more than 12 months
* No missing teeth, restorations, or morphological crown anomalies
* No radiological alveolar bone loss in the mandibular inter-canine region.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any radiological pathology around the lower anterior teeth
14 Years
20 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mustafa Kemal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Osman Fatih Arpag
associate professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Dentistry
Hatay, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Littlewood SJ, Kandasamy S, Huang G. Retention and relapse in clinical practice. Aust Dent J. 2017 Mar;62 Suppl 1:51-57. doi: 10.1111/adj.12475.
Bishara SE, Treder JE, Damon P, Olsen M. Changes in the dental arches and dentition between 25 and 45 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(6):417-22. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)0662.3.CO;2.
Johnston CD, Littlewood SJ. Retention in orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2015 Feb 16;218(3):119-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.47.
Golshah A, Feyli SA. Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers. Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 24;2022:1707520. doi: 10.1155/2022/1707520. eCollection 2022.
Kucera J, Marek I, Littlewood SJ. The effect of different bonded retainer wires on tooth mobility immediately after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2022 Mar 30;44(2):178-186. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab038.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
26308819120
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.