The Effect of Patient Preference on Retention Success

NCT ID: NCT06478771

Last Updated: 2024-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-14

Study Completion Date

2024-06-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim of the Study: To determine whether allowing the patient to choose the type of retainer affects the success of retention in terms of stability and patient satisfaction.

Hypothesis: Allowing the patient to choose their retainer can increase the success of retention.

Design: Two-arm parallel group randomized controlled clinical trial

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study investigates whether allowing patients to choose the type of retainer-fixed or removable-affects the success of orthodontic retention in terms of stability and patient satisfaction. The hypothesis is that patient autonomy in selecting their retainer type can enhance retention success. Conducted as a two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial, the study involves patients who have completed fixed appliance treatment. Participants are randomly assigned to either the intervention group, where they choose their retainer type after being informed of the pros and cons, or the control group, where the clinician decides the retainer type.

The primary outcome of the study is the stability of the orthodontic treatment, with secondary outcomes including retainer survival, oral health, and patient satisfaction. Stability is measured using indices such as Little's irregularity index, inter-canine width, and overjet, among others. Oral health is evaluated based on caries presence, sulcus depth, and gingival bleeding. Retainer survival is monitored by incidents of losing or breaking the retainer. Patient satisfaction is assessed through a detailed questionnaire covering aspects such as retainer usage, comfort, and perceived value. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding is not possible for operators, participants, or assessors. This study aims to provide insights into how patient choice influences the outcomes of orthodontic retention, potentially guiding future clinical practices towards enhanced patient satisfaction and treatment success.

This study aims to provide valuable insights into the impact of patient autonomy on orthodontic retention outcomes. By comparing patient-chosen and clinician-chosen retainer types, the research seeks to enhance our understanding of factors contributing to successful orthodontic retention and overall patient satisfaction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion Orthodontic Retention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Study group: Patients choose the type of retainer (Subgroup: fixed or removable) Control group: The clinician selects the retainer type (Subgroup: fixed or removable)
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

In this study, masking (blinding) is not possible due to the nature of the intervention. Both the participants and care providers, as well as the outcome assessors, will be aware of the type of retainer being used.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient choice-essix retainer

The group in which the patient chooses the retention appliance, essix retainer

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Essix retainer

Intervention Type DEVICE

A clear plastic removable retainer.

Patient choice-lingual retainer

The group in which the patient chooses the retention appliance, lingual retainer

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lingual retainer

Intervention Type DEVICE

A fixed retainer placed on the lingual side of the teeth.

Clinician choice-essix retainer

The group from which the orthodontist chooses the retention appliance, essix retainer

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Essix retainer

Intervention Type DEVICE

A clear plastic removable retainer.

Clinician choice-lingual retainer

The group from which the orthodontist chooses the retention appliance, lingual retainer

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lingual retainer

Intervention Type DEVICE

A fixed retainer placed on the lingual side of the teeth.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Essix retainer

A clear plastic removable retainer.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Lingual retainer

A fixed retainer placed on the lingual side of the teeth.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients older than age 12
2. Patients who have been treated with fixed orthodontic appliances
3. Patients with good standard of oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with initial diastema or other significant spacing
2. Patients with dentofacial syndromes/cleft lip and palate
3. Patients who had orthodontic treatment before
4. Patients with hypodontia (more than one tooth missing, except third molars)
5. Patients who have undergone orthognathic surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Irmak Ocak

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Irmak Ocak

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Irmak Ocak

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24237859-144

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.