Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
128 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-14
2024-06-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: Allowing the patient to choose their retainer can increase the success of retention.
Design: Two-arm parallel group randomized controlled clinical trial
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Essix Retainer vs Hawley Retainer
NCT01583933
The Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Removable Retainers
NCT05854953
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444
Comparison of Modified Vacuum-formed Retainers Versus Hawley Retainer
NCT04237298
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary outcome of the study is the stability of the orthodontic treatment, with secondary outcomes including retainer survival, oral health, and patient satisfaction. Stability is measured using indices such as Little's irregularity index, inter-canine width, and overjet, among others. Oral health is evaluated based on caries presence, sulcus depth, and gingival bleeding. Retainer survival is monitored by incidents of losing or breaking the retainer. Patient satisfaction is assessed through a detailed questionnaire covering aspects such as retainer usage, comfort, and perceived value. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding is not possible for operators, participants, or assessors. This study aims to provide insights into how patient choice influences the outcomes of orthodontic retention, potentially guiding future clinical practices towards enhanced patient satisfaction and treatment success.
This study aims to provide valuable insights into the impact of patient autonomy on orthodontic retention outcomes. By comparing patient-chosen and clinician-chosen retainer types, the research seeks to enhance our understanding of factors contributing to successful orthodontic retention and overall patient satisfaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient choice-essix retainer
The group in which the patient chooses the retention appliance, essix retainer
Essix retainer
A clear plastic removable retainer.
Patient choice-lingual retainer
The group in which the patient chooses the retention appliance, lingual retainer
Lingual retainer
A fixed retainer placed on the lingual side of the teeth.
Clinician choice-essix retainer
The group from which the orthodontist chooses the retention appliance, essix retainer
Essix retainer
A clear plastic removable retainer.
Clinician choice-lingual retainer
The group from which the orthodontist chooses the retention appliance, lingual retainer
Lingual retainer
A fixed retainer placed on the lingual side of the teeth.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Essix retainer
A clear plastic removable retainer.
Lingual retainer
A fixed retainer placed on the lingual side of the teeth.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have been treated with fixed orthodontic appliances
3. Patients with good standard of oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with dentofacial syndromes/cleft lip and palate
3. Patients who had orthodontic treatment before
4. Patients with hypodontia (more than one tooth missing, except third molars)
5. Patients who have undergone orthognathic surgery
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hacettepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Irmak Ocak
Assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Irmak Ocak
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Irmak Ocak
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24237859-144
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.