Comparison of Two Types of Lingual Fixed Retainer Fabricated
NCT ID: NCT06244810
Last Updated: 2025-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-15
2025-03-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Modified Vacuum-formed Retainers Versus Hawley Retainer
NCT04237298
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574
The Effect of Patient Preference on Retention Success
NCT06478771
Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Modified Twin-Block Appliance With Clear Plates
NCT05950581
Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy
NCT05684510
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Patients will be apply to them a lingual retainer made of fibers manufactured using CAD-CAM technology
2. Patients will be apply to them a lingual retainer made of metal made using CAD-CAM technology
3. Patients will be apply to them a conventional lingual retainer made of braided stainless steel wire (control group)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
lingual retainer made of fiber made using cad cam Technique
lingual retainer made of fiber manufactured using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
Lingual retainer from Fiber
lingual retainer manufactured from fiber using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
lingual retainer made of metal made using cad cam Technique
lingual retainer made of metal manufactured using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months
Lingual retainer from metal
lingual retainer manufactured from metal using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
Traditional lingual retainer made of braided stainless steel wire
lingual retainer made of braided stainless steel wire applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
Traditional retianer from braided
lingual retainer manufactured using traditional technique from stainless steel applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lingual retainer from Fiber
lingual retainer manufactured from fiber using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
Lingual retainer from metal
lingual retainer manufactured from metal using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
Traditional retianer from braided
lingual retainer manufactured using traditional technique from stainless steel applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
14 Years
24 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hama University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Manar A Warrar, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hama University-Syrian Arab Republic
Rabab Alsabbagh, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Professor of Orthodontics, University of Hama Dental School, Hama, Syria.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
FADI Alhaji JNAID
Damascus, None Selected, Syria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Hama University -Dentistry
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.