Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block

NCT ID: NCT05722379

Last Updated: 2023-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although emerging evidence demonstrated that left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a promising alternative for patients with either a bradycardia or a heart failure pacing indication. However, a direct comparison of the safety, efficacy and LV systolic synchrony between LBBP and RVP regimens was rare. In this study, the investigators aim to conduct a comparison of the safety and effectiveness performance between these two pacing methods for patients with atrioventricular block (AVB). The investigators focused on AVB patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantations from the 1st of January 2018 to the 18th of November 2021 at West China Hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) is the standard treatment for patients with continuous ventricular pacing needs. However, clinical studies have shown that RVP can cause electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony of the left ventricle and increase the risks of cardiac insufficiency, atrial fibrillation (AF) and death. Although emerging evidence demonstrated that left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a promising alternative for patients with either a bradycardia or a heart failure pacing indication. However, a direct comparison of the safety, efficacy and LV systolic synchrony between LBBP and RVP regimens was rare. In this study, the investigators aim to conduct a comparison of the safety and effectiveness performance between these two pacing methods for patients with atrioventricular block (AVB). The investigators focused on AVB patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantations from the 1st of January 2018 to the 18th of November 2021 at West China Hospital.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

AVB - Atrioventricular Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

high-grade AVB patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantations

left bundle branch pacing (LBBP)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After recording the His potential, the 3830-69 lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN USA) was sent 1-2 cm forward and downward to find the insertion point of the right side of intra-ventricular septum combined with the pre-rotation impedance and ECG changes. Ultimately, the tip was perpendicularly straightforward posited against the septum to the left septal side .

Right ventricular pacing (RVP)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) is the standard treatment for patients with continuous ventricular pacing needs.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

left bundle branch pacing (LBBP)

After recording the His potential, the 3830-69 lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN USA) was sent 1-2 cm forward and downward to find the insertion point of the right side of intra-ventricular septum combined with the pre-rotation impedance and ECG changes. Ultimately, the tip was perpendicularly straightforward posited against the septum to the left septal side .

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Right ventricular pacing (RVP)

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) is the standard treatment for patients with continuous ventricular pacing needs.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* included consecutively high-grade AVB patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantations from the 1 s t of January 2018 to the 18 thof November 2021 at West China Hospital

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with pacemaker replacements were excluded.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

West China Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhongxiu Chen

Dr, cardiology department, principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Sichuan, Sichuan, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Zhongxiu Chen, Dr

Role: CONTACT

18030708238

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Junyan Zhang

Role: primary

18848242671

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chen Z, Xu Y, Jiang L, Zhang R, Zhao H, Liu R, Zhang L, Li Y, Liu X. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Atrioventricular Block: An Observational Cohort Study. Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 Aug 21;2023:6659048. doi: 10.1155/2023/6659048. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37645544 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WestChinaH-LBBP-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.