Left Ventricular Pacing to Avoid Cardiac Enlargement Study

NCT ID: NCT01302717

Last Updated: 2023-04-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, the investigators will examine whether left ventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in preventing deterioration of left ventricular systolic function and cardiac remodeling in patients with bradycardia with high risk for development of pacing-induced heart failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this prospective, we will randomly assign 98 patients who need permanent pacemaker due to complete atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome to receive left ventricular pacing (49 patients) or right ventricular apical pacing (49 patients). Patients will be paced with temporary pacemaker lead, and only those with paced QRS duration ≥185 ms will be enrolled.

The primary endpoint is left ventricular ejection fraction measured by modified Simpson method at 12 months. The secondary end points include left ventricular systolic end-systolic and diastolic volume, LV strain, NYHA functional class, exercise performance (using treadmill test), quality of life (using SF-36v2), NT-proBNP at 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complete AV Block Sick Sinus Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Right ventricular pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RV pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

The right ventricular lead are positioned at the right ventricular apex.

Left ventricular pacing

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LV pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

The left ventricular lead are positioned preferentially at the posterolateral or lateral venous branches of the coronary sinus.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LV pacing

The left ventricular lead are positioned preferentially at the posterolateral or lateral venous branches of the coronary sinus.

Intervention Type DEVICE

RV pacing

The right ventricular lead are positioned at the right ventricular apex.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sinus-node dysfunction or bradycardia due to advanced atrioventricular block
* Paced QRS duration ≥185 ms

Exclusion Criteria

* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50 %
* Acute coronary syndrome
* If they had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass surgery within the previous 3 months
* if they had a life expectancy of less than 1 year
* if they had received a heart transplant
Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Seil Oh

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seil Oh, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Seongnam, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LVPACE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.