Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in AVB Patients

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-01

Study Completion Date

2021-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) causes left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by inducing electrical interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony. His bundle pacing may restore the the atrioventricular, interventricular and intraventricular electrical synchronization, however, Increased pacing threshold might result in the early depletion of the pacemaker, and finally brought on pacemaker replacement, which was one of the major causes of device infection. Pacing the left bundle branch beyond the conduction block site might achieve a low and stable output and narrow QRSd. The investigators were prepared to consecutively include patients with atrioventricular block, divided into the left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) group and the conventional right ventricular pacing group. The electrophysiological characteristics of LBBAP and right ventricular pacing were compared with ECG characteristics. The left and right ventricular synchrony and left and right cardiac function were evaluated by 3D ultrasound, and the short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of LBBAP were evaluated.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block

NCT05722379

AVB - Atrioventricular Block

UNKNOWN

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Pacing in Atrioventricular Block

NCT05129098

Atrioventricular Nodal Disease

COMPLETED NA

Bi-ventricular Epicardial Activation in Left Bundle Area Pacing: a Comparison Study

NCT05401851

Bradyarrhythmia Pacemaker Syndrome Biventricular Cardiac Pacemaker Malfunction

UNKNOWN NA

Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Cardiac Dysfunction and AV Block

NCT05553626

Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree Heart Failure Left Bundle Branch Pacing

UNKNOWN NA

Effect of His Bundle Pacing in Treatment of Slow Arrhythmia on Function of Left Atrial and Ventricle

NCT03590353

Slow Arrhythmia His Bundle Pacing Function of Left Atrial and Ventricle

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is intended to be included in Fuwai hospital for admission to the atrioventricular block, with permanent pacemaker implant indications recommended by current guidelines. Patients were assessed for preoperative electrocardiogram, quality of life scores, cardiac function, and left and right ventricular synchrony. Patients were followed up by regular outpatients. The electrocardiogram, quality of life score, echocardiographic function, left and right ventricular synchrony, pacing parameters and pacing ratio were evaluated immediately after surgery, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. At the same time, the left bundle branch area pacing success rate, complications during intraoperative and postoperative follow-up were recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrioventricular Block Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LBBAP group

patients received left bundle branch area pacing

permanent left bundle branch area pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implant the pacing lead in the left bundle branch area instead of traditional RV pacing site(septal or apical). Successful LBBAP was defined as the paced QRS morphology of right bundle branch block pattern in lead V1 and QRS duration (QRSd) less than 130ms.

traditional RVP group

Age and sex-matched patients received traditional right ventricular pacing

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

permanent left bundle branch area pacing

Implant the pacing lead in the left bundle branch area instead of traditional RV pacing site(septal or apical). Successful LBBAP was defined as the paced QRS morphology of right bundle branch block pattern in lead V1 and QRS duration (QRSd) less than 130ms.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age over 18 years old;
2. Atrioventricular block patients with indication for permanent ventricular pacing;
3. LVEF\> 40%;
4. With informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria

1. Persistent atrial fibrillation;
2. Moderate or more severe valvular disease;
3. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy；
4. Myocardial amyloidosis；
5. With indication for CRT or ICD implantation according to the current guideline;
6. Poor condition of the acoustic window because of emphysema or other reasons;
7. Patients refused postoperative follow-up.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes