Synchrony in Cardiac Conduction: Assessing the Effects of Pacing on Cardiac Performance Through Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Advanced ECG-imaging
NCT ID: NCT06843135
Last Updated: 2025-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-01
2028-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), a non-invasive and highly accurate tool for assessing cardiac structure and function, is uniquely positioned to elucidate the effects of CSP and RVP on cardiac performance. This trial aims to evaluate the comparative mechanical effects of these pacing strategies, potentially identifying the optimal approach for improving outcomes in patients with AV block.
Objective To investigate and compare the effects of CSP and RVP on cardiac performance, as assessed by CMR and electrocardiographic imaging (ECG-imaging).
Main Trial Endpoints The primary endpoints are measures of LV and RV performance assessed via CMR, including: ventricular volumes, ejection fraction (EF), and myocardial strain
Secondary Trial Endpoints
Secondary endpoints include:
Safety and Feasibility:
* Adverse events (e.g., troponin release, lead displacement, arrhythmias, heart failure).
* Technical feasibility (e.g., ease of device implantation, ability to maintain proper pacing).
Electrophysiological Assessment:
* Degree of selectivity in engaging the native conduction system.
* Ventricular activation times as assessed by ECG-imaging.
Trial Design This is a randomized, controlled, single blind, two-center crossover trial. Participants will undergo CSP and RVP in a randomized sequence, each for six months. CMR and ECG-imaging will be performed at 6 months (end of the first pacing phase) and 12 months (end of the second pacing phase).
Trial Population The trial will enroll 88 patients with a normal of at most mildly reduced ejection fraction and an indication for ventricular pacing.
Interventions Participants will undergo CMR and ECG-imaging at 6 months and 12 months.
Ethical Considerations This trial is designed to advance understanding of the mechanical and clinical effects of CSP relative to RVP in patients with AV block. The anticipated benefits include improved cardiac performance and enhanced quality of life. The primary burden to participants is the requirement for an additional CMR scan, which may be perceived as inconvenient or even stressful. The trial minimizes risk by utilizing established clinical procedures and closely monitoring participants for adverse events.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Septal Vs Apical Pacing on Right and Left Ventricular Performance
NCT01798043
Impact of Pacing Mode and Diastolic Function on Cardiac Output
NCT04068233
Effect of Site of Right Ventricular (RV) Pacing on RV Function, Left Ventricular (LV) Dyssynchrony and Contraction Efficiency
NCT06636851
Left Ventricular Septal Pacing: Potential Application for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT03415945
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block
NCT05722379
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conduction system pacing
Ventricular pacing
Participants will undergo conductionsystem pacing and right ventricular pacing in a randomized sequence, each for six months. After each phase, patients will undergo a CMR scan and advanced ECG imaging
Right ventricular pacing
Ventricular pacing
Participants will undergo conductionsystem pacing and right ventricular pacing in a randomized sequence, each for six months. After each phase, patients will undergo a CMR scan and advanced ECG imaging
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ventricular pacing
Participants will undergo conductionsystem pacing and right ventricular pacing in a randomized sequence, each for six months. After each phase, patients will undergo a CMR scan and advanced ECG imaging
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥35%
* Patients with an indication for ventricular pacing and high-degree atrioventricular block where the degree of anticipated RV pacing is \>20% including:
* Third degree AV block
* Symptomatic or asymptomatic second-degree AV block
* High degree AV block
* Pace and ablate (AV-node ablation)
Exclusion Criteria
* CRT indication (patients with heart failure (NYHA \>1) in sinus rhythm with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35%, QRS duration \>150 ms, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS morphology despite optimised medical therapy)
* Inability to undergo CMR (i.e. severe claustrophobia or MRI contraindications)
* Life expectancy \<12 months
* Indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
* Presence of severe valve disease or mechanical valves
* Any prior attempt at implantation of an ICD, CRT, CSP
* Permanent AF with rapid ventricular response, unless pace and ablate
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luuk Hopman
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL88751.018.25
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.