Synchrony in Cardiac Conduction: Assessing the Effects of Pacing on Cardiac Performance Through Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Advanced ECG-imaging

NCT ID: NCT06843135

Last Updated: 2025-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

88 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-01

Study Completion Date

2028-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale Right ventricular pacing (RVP) is an established and effective therapy for patients with atrioventricular (AV) block. However, frequent RVP has been associated with left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and may progess heart failure. Conduction system pacing (CSP), a recently introduced alternative to RVP, aims to preserve physiological ventricular activation by engaging the heart's native conduction system. CSP includes diverse pacing approaches such as selective or non-selective His-bundle pacing, selective left bundle pacing, and LV-septal pacing, each with varying levels of fidelity in reproducing normal conduction. The mechanical impact of these distinct CSP strategies on left and right ventricular (RV) performance remains poorly understood.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), a non-invasive and highly accurate tool for assessing cardiac structure and function, is uniquely positioned to elucidate the effects of CSP and RVP on cardiac performance. This trial aims to evaluate the comparative mechanical effects of these pacing strategies, potentially identifying the optimal approach for improving outcomes in patients with AV block.

Objective To investigate and compare the effects of CSP and RVP on cardiac performance, as assessed by CMR and electrocardiographic imaging (ECG-imaging).

Main Trial Endpoints The primary endpoints are measures of LV and RV performance assessed via CMR, including: ventricular volumes, ejection fraction (EF), and myocardial strain

Secondary Trial Endpoints

Secondary endpoints include:

Safety and Feasibility:

* Adverse events (e.g., troponin release, lead displacement, arrhythmias, heart failure).
* Technical feasibility (e.g., ease of device implantation, ability to maintain proper pacing).

Electrophysiological Assessment:

* Degree of selectivity in engaging the native conduction system.
* Ventricular activation times as assessed by ECG-imaging.

Trial Design This is a randomized, controlled, single blind, two-center crossover trial. Participants will undergo CSP and RVP in a randomized sequence, each for six months. CMR and ECG-imaging will be performed at 6 months (end of the first pacing phase) and 12 months (end of the second pacing phase).

Trial Population The trial will enroll 88 patients with a normal of at most mildly reduced ejection fraction and an indication for ventricular pacing.

Interventions Participants will undergo CMR and ECG-imaging at 6 months and 12 months.

Ethical Considerations This trial is designed to advance understanding of the mechanical and clinical effects of CSP relative to RVP in patients with AV block. The anticipated benefits include improved cardiac performance and enhanced quality of life. The primary burden to participants is the requirement for an additional CMR scan, which may be perceived as inconvenient or even stressful. The trial minimizes risk by utilizing established clinical procedures and closely monitoring participants for adverse events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure AV Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conduction system pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ventricular pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will undergo conductionsystem pacing and right ventricular pacing in a randomized sequence, each for six months. After each phase, patients will undergo a CMR scan and advanced ECG imaging

Right ventricular pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ventricular pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will undergo conductionsystem pacing and right ventricular pacing in a randomized sequence, each for six months. After each phase, patients will undergo a CMR scan and advanced ECG imaging

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ventricular pacing

Participants will undergo conductionsystem pacing and right ventricular pacing in a randomized sequence, each for six months. After each phase, patients will undergo a CMR scan and advanced ECG imaging

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥35%
* Patients with an indication for ventricular pacing and high-degree atrioventricular block where the degree of anticipated RV pacing is \>20% including:
* Third degree AV block
* Symptomatic or asymptomatic second-degree AV block
* High degree AV block
* Pace and ablate (AV-node ablation)

Exclusion Criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

* CRT indication (patients with heart failure (NYHA \>1) in sinus rhythm with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35%, QRS duration \>150 ms, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS morphology despite optimised medical therapy)
* Inability to undergo CMR (i.e. severe claustrophobia or MRI contraindications)
* Life expectancy \<12 months
* Indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
* Presence of severe valve disease or mechanical valves
* Any prior attempt at implantation of an ICD, CRT, CSP
* Permanent AF with rapid ventricular response, unless pace and ablate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luuk Hopman

Postdoctoral Research Fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr. Hopman

Role: CONTACT

+31204444105

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL88751.018.25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Short Atrioventricular Delay Pacing
NCT01233661 WITHDRAWN NA