Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction

NCT ID: NCT06026683

Last Updated: 2024-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-30

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to demonstrate that conduction system pacing (CSP) can preserve a normal ventricular function compared to right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) in patients with pre-implant preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a high burden of expected ventricular pacing due to atrioventricular conduction block (AV block).

After informed consent signature, patients with high degree AV block and normal LVEF will be randomized to permanent pacemaker stimulation with CSP vs RVAP.

All the patients have a complete evaluation before the procedure and at 3 and 6 months follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The STAY trial (Conduction System sTimulation to Avoid left ventricle dYsfunction) is a single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel, controlled study, comparing mid-term outcomes in a population undergoing pacemaker implantation due to a high degree atrio-ventricular block (AVB). The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients signed informed consent and were implanted between September 2019 until December 2022 in a 1:1 randomized fashion to conventional RVAP vs CSP (HBS or LBBS). Randomization was performed during the pre-procedural antibiotic infusion.

All the patients have a complete evaluation before the procedure and at 3 and 6 months follow-up, including demographic and clinical characteristics, physical examination, twelve-lead ECG, Minnesota score (MLWHFQ), and blood test with NT-ProBNP determination. Patients also have a transthoracic echography before the procedure and at 6 months follow-up.

At 6 months echocardiographic and clinical data will be compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomized into 2 groups according to pacing site: CSP vs RVAP.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The study is blinded for the patient and for the echocardiographers.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CSP (Conduction system pacing)

Patients with pacemaker implanted with conduction system pacing.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pacemaker implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation of pacemaker with conduction system pacing or right ventricular apical pacing

RVAP (Right ventricular apical pacing)

Patients with pacemaker implanted with right ventricular apical pacing.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pacemaker implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation of pacemaker with conduction system pacing or right ventricular apical pacing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pacemaker implant

Implantation of pacemaker with conduction system pacing or right ventricular apical pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age of 18 years or more
2. Preserved or mild deteriorated LVEF (Simpson \>40%) assessed by a recent (\<1 month before implantation) transthoracic echocardiography.
3. Indication for pacing based on the presence of a high degree AVB, and consequently with an anticipated high burden of ventricular pacing (\>50%).
4. Live expectancy of more than 6 months and capability to understand the protocol, signing the informed consent form and accomplish the follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator device.
2. Patients with previous LVD and a recovered LVEF
3. History of myocardial infarction/revascularization or cardiac surgery within 6 months before randomization
4. Pregnancy, active cancer treatment, or participation in another clinical trial with active treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Parc de Salut Mar

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ermengol Vallès

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ermengol Vallès, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Parc de Salut Mar

Carlos González, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Parc de Salut Mar. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gonzalez-Matos CE, Rodriguez-Queralto O, Zaraket F, Jimenez J, Casteigt B, Valles E. Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Feb;17(2):e012473. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012473. Epub 2024 Jan 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38284238 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STAY trial

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.