Superiority of Perineoplasty as Concomitant Surgical Procedure During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT ID: NCT05713422
Last Updated: 2024-08-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
305 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-23
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surgical Study Comparing 2 Procedures for the Treatment of a Dropped Bladder
NCT00271102
Prediction of Postsurgical Symptomatic Outcomes With Preoperative Pessary Use
NCT02680145
Pelvic Floor Exercise Before Surgery in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03064750
Comparison of Anterior Vaginal Sacrospinofixation With Laparoscopic Promontofixation for the Treatment of Anterior and Apical Genitourinary Prolapse
NCT03200327
Predictors of Recovery Expectancy
NCT04274491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Patient characteristics (age, BMI, smoking, obstetric history)
* Physical examination including POP-Q score. The genital hiatus (gh) at rest (as part of the POP-Q) will be used to assess the wideness of the vaginal introitus.
* Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
* Pelvic Floor Ultrasound 2DStudy measurements;
* Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-ir), Dutch Perineal Support Questionnaire (DPSQ), General Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L), Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)
* Patient and surgeons considerations with respect to level III repair;
Postoperative measurements:
* Regular physical check-up will be at 4-8 weeks after procedure.
* Physical examination including POP-Q score
* Patient Global Impression of Improvement score (PGI-I)
* Pelvic Floor Ultrasound 2D
* iMCQ, iPCQ, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Extra follow up:
* Physical check-up 12 \& 24 months after surgery:
* Physical examination including POP-Q score
* Pelvic Floor Ultrasound 2D
* PFDI-20, PGI-I, DPSQ, PISQ-ir, iMCQ, iPCQ, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Operative procedure; standard treatment
Vaginal level I and/or level II repair will be performed as usual (eg anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphy, sacrospinous fixation etc.) without perineoplasty as decided by surgeon and patient. This procedure is considered as the control group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Operative procedure; standard treatment including level III repair
Vaginal level I and/or level II repair will be performed as usual, but now including perineoplasty (level III repair) as decided by surgeon and patient. The decision of a perineoplasty to vaginal level I and/or level II repair is based on a shared decision made by surgeon together with the patient. The considerations upon which this decision has been established in a consensus meeting of Dutch urogynecologists and will be collected by a questionnaire, This group is considered as the 'intervention' group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Complaints of pelvic organ prolapse
3. Indication for prolapse surgery (level I and/or level II repair)
4. Genital hiatus (GH) according to POP-Q staging of ≥4 cm and ≤7 cm
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy at baseline or intendancy to become pregnant during the study period
3. Patients with previous surgery for POP (previous mid urethral sling operations for urinary stress incontinence not excluded)
4. Unwilling and / or incapable of giving informed consent
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Spaarne Gasthuis
OTHER
Marjolein Spiering
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marjolein Spiering
MSc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Spaarne Gasthuis
Haarlem, , Netherlands
Bergman Clinics
Hilversum, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL82381.018.22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.