Impact of Level III Support Procedure on Enlarged Genital Hiatus After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
NCT ID: NCT04480671
Last Updated: 2024-10-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
94 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-08-26
2024-07-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
An exploratory sub-aim (as of October 2021) of the study is to evaluate the levator hiatal area as compared with the genital hiatus by using preoperative and postoperative transperineal ultrasounds. Subjects will be invited to participate, but is not required for study participation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06903988
Credibility of Ultrasound Detection of Female Genital Prolapse Mesh
NCT06000215
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Apical Prolapse Stage III-IV
NCT01762384
Early Versus Late Voiding Trials After Prolapse Repair
NCT02739256
Comparison of Anterior Vaginal Sacrospinofixation With Laparoscopic Promontofixation for the Treatment of Anterior and Apical Genitourinary Prolapse
NCT03200327
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sacrocolpopexy
This group will only receive the sacrocolpopexy for their pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
All study participants are planning with their surgeon a minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (robotic or laparoscopic) to repair pelvic organ prolapse.
Transperineal ultrasound of the Pelvic Floor
Subjects from either arm will be invited to participate in this exploratory arm of the study. If they choose to participate, they will have a preoperative ultrasound performed and an ultrasound performed at the time of their 6 month visit.
Sacrocolpopexy and concomitant level III support procedure
This randomized group will receive an additional vaginal repair for level III support at the conclusion of the sacrocolpopexy.
Level III support procedure
A level III support procedure is aimed at repairing the distal support of the vagina with either a posterior colporrhaphy and/or a perineorrhaphy.
Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
All study participants are planning with their surgeon a minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (robotic or laparoscopic) to repair pelvic organ prolapse.
Transperineal ultrasound of the Pelvic Floor
Subjects from either arm will be invited to participate in this exploratory arm of the study. If they choose to participate, they will have a preoperative ultrasound performed and an ultrasound performed at the time of their 6 month visit.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Level III support procedure
A level III support procedure is aimed at repairing the distal support of the vagina with either a posterior colporrhaphy and/or a perineorrhaphy.
Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
All study participants are planning with their surgeon a minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (robotic or laparoscopic) to repair pelvic organ prolapse.
Transperineal ultrasound of the Pelvic Floor
Subjects from either arm will be invited to participate in this exploratory arm of the study. If they choose to participate, they will have a preoperative ultrasound performed and an ultrasound performed at the time of their 6 month visit.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Planning a surgical repair of POP with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy
* Preoperative resting genital hiatus measure between 4.0 and 7.5cm
\*Note: we will NOT exclude patients based on prior surgical history (including prior posterior colporrhaphy)\*
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pittsburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephanie Glass Clark
Assistant Professor of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bradley MS, Askew AL, Vaughan MH, Kawasaki A, Visco AG. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):514.e1-514.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.046. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
Nosti PA, Umoh Andy U, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L, Gutman RE. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000036.
Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):435.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.035. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
Vaughan MH, Siddiqui NY, Newcomb LK, Weidner AC, Kawasaki A, Visco AG, Bradley MS. Surgical Alteration of Genital Hiatus Size and Anatomic Failure After Vaginal Vault Suspension. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1137-1144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002593.
Carter-Brooks CM, Lowder JL, Du AL, Lavelle ES, Giugale LE, Shepherd JP. Restoring Genital Hiatus to Normative Values After Apical Suspension Alone Versus With Level 3 Support Procedures. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 May/Jun;25(3):226-230. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000528.
Sutkin G, Zyczynski HM, Sridhar A, Jelovsek JE, Rardin CR, Mazloomdoost D, Rahn DD, Nguyen JN, Andy UU, Meyer I, Gantz MG; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):161.e1-161.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY19110286
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.