Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

NCT ID: NCT06903988

Last Updated: 2025-11-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-05

Study Completion Date

2026-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a single-center, non-blinded, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, planning to recruit 86 patients with Stage III or higher pelvic organ prolapse who are unresponsive to conservative treatment and are requesting surgical treatment. Patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to the transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation group and the laparoscopic lateral suspension group in a 1:1 ratio. Follow-ups will be conducted at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery for the enrolled patients. The primary outcome measure is the difference in surgical success rate between the two groups of patients at 1 year after surgery. We hypothesize that the surgical success rate of laparoscopic lateral suspension is not inferior to that of transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

laparoscopic lateral suspension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

laparoscopic lateral suspension

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic lateral suspension: Place a 1/2 T4 mesh in the vesicovaginal space. The two lateral slings are passed out from the outer upper side of the bilateral anterior superior iliac spine, and the prolapsed organs are suspended to the abdominal wall.

transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation: Dissect the rectovaginal space to expose the right sacrospinous ligament, and fix the cervix or vaginal cuff to the right sacrospinous ligament.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laparoscopic lateral suspension

Laparoscopic lateral suspension: Place a 1/2 T4 mesh in the vesicovaginal space. The two lateral slings are passed out from the outer upper side of the bilateral anterior superior iliac spine, and the prolapsed organs are suspended to the abdominal wall.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation

Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation: Dissect the rectovaginal space to expose the right sacrospinous ligament, and fix the cervix or vaginal cuff to the right sacrospinous ligament.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years;
2. According to the POP-Q classification, patients who meet any of the following conditions: a. Patients with anterior wall prolapse of stage III or higher; b. Patients with apical prolapse of stage III or higher;
3. Patients who refuse conservative treatment or have ineffective conservative treatment and request surgical treatment for prolapse;
4. Patients who voluntarily participate in this study, sign the informed consent form, and are able to attend follow-up visits on time;
5. Patients who have received education at the primary school level or above;
6. Patients who are able to visit the hospital for examinations;
7. Patients who are deemed fit to undergo surgery according to preoperative anesthesia assessment.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who have previously undergone surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP);
2. Patients with a history of anti-incontinence surgery or who are planned to undergo mid-urethral sling surgery for anti-incontinence during the current operation;
3. Patients who, after evaluation by the surgeon, have other conditions that affect eligibility for inclusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wang Shiyan

Associate Chief Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University People's Hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024PHB374-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.