PEssary Plus Physiotherapy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (PEPPY)

NCT ID: NCT01136889

Last Updated: 2011-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the effectiveness of a PFMT intervention in conjunction with vaginal pessary management versus vaginal pessary management alone for women with pelvic organ prolapse.
2. To develop and test the methods for a main trial.

The ultimate aim of a large multi-centre RCT would be to answer the question:

Is conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse with an individualised PFMT intervention in conjunction with vaginal pessary more effective than vaginal pessary alone in reducing prolapse-specific symptoms, prolapse severity and the need for further prolapse treatment?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is hypothesised that undertaking PFMT with a pessary in place may increase the level of existing muscle support in the pelvic area: by reducing the descent of the pelvic organs and the consequent stretching of soft tissue the pessary may allow the pelvic floor muscles to be exercised and strengthened more effectively. Potentially this could lead to additional improvements in the pessary retention rate and associated prolapse symptoms beyond that expected from the pessary alone. Urine, bowel and sexual function, which can be affected by prolapse, may also improve independently in response to a PFMT intervention. If a more permanent reduction in prolapse symptoms results from concurrent use of PFMT, this may delay or prevent the need for long term pessary use or surgical intervention. In summary, a PFMT intervention in combination with pessary management for vaginal prolapse may be more effective in reducing symptoms and increasing quality of life than management of the prolapse with a pessary alone. This study will start to provide the evidence to address this question.

This is a feasibility study to develop the methods for a multi-centre RCT. It will run alongside The POPPY Trial (a 17 centre trial of PFMT already underway in the UK; ClinicalTrials Number NCT00476892). Three of The POPPY Trial centres will be involved in this feasibility study. Over a 12 month period, we plan to enrol 50 women with diagnosed prolapse of stage I to IV, who are not eligible for The POPPY Trial because they require a pessary. These women will be randomised into one of two groups: PFMT (delivered by a physiotherapist at 5 appointments over 16 weeks) in conjunction with pessary management of their prolapse or pessary management alone. All women will have a nurse appointment six months after randomisation at which time their pessary will be removed. A replacement pessary will not be immediately re-fitted. At seven months after randomisation all women will have a review appointment with their gynaecologist to have their prolapse assessed, the pessary re-fitted if necessary, and other treatment needs discussed. Women will complete postal questionnaires, at baseline (prior to randomisation), at six months post-randomisation (prior to seeing the nurse to have the pessary removed), and seven months post-randomisation (prior to the 7 month gynaecologist review appointment), and record symptoms in a diary for one month after removal of the pessary. Key outcomes are: prolapse symptoms, prolapse-related quality of life, prolapse severity, and additional prolapse treatment received up to seven months after study entry.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PFMT plus routine pessary management

Women allocated to the intervention group will be invited to attend 5 out-patient appointments over a 16 week period with a trained specialist women's health physiotherapist at the study centre. Women will be taught how to contract the muscles, and also how to contract and hold prior to an event that increases intra-abdominal pressure ("the Knack"). Tailored advice will be given on ways of reducing intra-abdominal pressure, e.g. advice on weight loss, chronic cough, heavy lifting and general exercise. A prolapse specific Lifestyle Advice sheet will also be given to the women by the physiotherapist.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PFMT

Intervention Type OTHER

Women who have been successfully fitted with a vaginal pessary will be asked to attend five outpatient appointments over a 16 week period with a trained specialist women's health physiotherapist.

Lifestyle

Women allocated to the control group will be sent a Lifestyle Advice Leaflet only. They will have no planned intervention after their pessary is fitted, other than routine pessary management according to local protocols. The Lifestyle Advice Leaflet gives instructions on seeking advice, where appropriate, about weight loss, constipation, and avoidance of heavy lifting, coughing and high impact exercise, with a view to minimising increases in intra-abdominal pressure which may cause the prolapse to worsen.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PFMT

Intervention Type OTHER

Women who have been successfully fitted with a vaginal pessary will be asked to attend five outpatient appointments over a 16 week period with a trained specialist women's health physiotherapist.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PFMT

Women who have been successfully fitted with a vaginal pessary will be asked to attend five outpatient appointments over a 16 week period with a trained specialist women's health physiotherapist.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pelvic Floor Muscle Training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Women:

* who are new attendees at outpatient gynaecology clinics with a primary complaint of prolapse;
* who have a prolapse of stage I to IV confirmed by their gynaecologist using the POP-Q grading system;
* who have a prolapse of one or more of the following types:
* anterior vaginal wall prolapse (urethrocele, cystocele,paravaginal defect);
* uterine/cervical prolapse;
* vaginal vault (after hysterectomy)prolapse;
* posterior vaginal wall prolapse (enterocele, rectocele, perineal deficiency);
* who require a vaginal pessary for treatment of their prolapse (the process of fitting the pessary will be according to standard practice at the centre thus the protocol for choice of pessary, insertion and follow-up will be determined locally);
* who successfully retain the vaginal pessary for two weeks after fitting;
* who are willing to participate in the study and to comply with their group allocation.

Exclusion Criteria

Women:

* who wish surgical treatment for prolapse and wish to be immediately added to the surgical waiting list;
* who have had previous surgical treatment for prolapse;
* who have had a pessary fitted for treatment of prolapse within the last 12 months;
* who have had previous formal instruction in PFMT;
* who present with contraindications to either pessary or PFMT treatment;
* who are unable to comply with PFMT treatment;
* who have local atrophy (this must be treated first);
* who are less than 6-months postnatal;
* who are pregnant;
* who are unable to give informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Glasgow Caledonian University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Professor Suzanne Hagen

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NMAHP Research Unit

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Falkirk and District Royal Infirmary

Falkirk, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southern General Hospital

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Victoria Infirmary

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bugge C, Adams EJ, Gopinath D, Stewart F, Dembinsky M, Sobiesuo P, Kearney R. Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):CD004010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33207004 (View on PubMed)

Bugge C, Williams B, Hagen S, Logan J, Glazener C, Pringle S, Sinclair L. A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse. Trials. 2013 Oct 25;14:353. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-353.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24160371 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Wellbeing of Women

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MREC

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NHS GG&C

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RG957

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.