Vaginal Estrogen and Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in Women With Symptomatic Mild Prolapse

NCT ID: NCT01648751

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-31

Study Completion Date

2023-03-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized controlled trial in which women with symptomatic mild pelvic organ prolapse undergoing Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy (PFPT) receive vaginal estrogen versus placebo to see if a combined approach to treatment leads to improvement in clinical outcomes. The investigators predict that PFPT in combination with vaginal estrogen will lead to decreased pelvic floor symptoms and improved anatomical support corroborated by biomarker data.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is unknown. Few studies have correlated patient symptoms and amount of prolapse with biomarkers. POP has traditionally been managed with a pessary or surgery. Recent studies suggest a reduction in POP symptoms following Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy (PFPT). Vaginally delivered hormones are also commonly used to treat prolapse symptoms, with little evidence supporting a clinical benefit. The investigators hypothesize that the optimal approach to improving prolapse symptoms in the patient with mild prolapse requires re-alignment and strengthening of levator muscles via PFPT, and optimization of tissue integrity via local estrogen therapy. The investigators propose to test this hypothesis in a randomized controlled trial in which women with symptomatic mild prolapse opting for PFPT, receive treatment with PFPT in combination with vaginal estrogen versus placebo. The investigators predict that the combined approach will lead to decreased symptoms and improved anatomical support corroborated by biomarker data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vaginal estrogen

Patients in the experimental group will receive vaginal estrogen cream

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vaginal estrogen

Intervention Type DRUG

1 gram vaginally for 7 days, followed by 1 gram vaginally twice weekly thereafter

Placebo cream

Patients in the comparison group will receive placebo vaginal cream

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

1 gram vaginally for 7 days, followed by 1 gram vaginally twice weekly thereafter

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vaginal estrogen

1 gram vaginally for 7 days, followed by 1 gram vaginally twice weekly thereafter

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

1 gram vaginally for 7 days, followed by 1 gram vaginally twice weekly thereafter

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Premarin vaginal cream Placebo cream

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women in good health aged 40-80
* Has symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse; answers yes to at least 1 of the following questions:

Do you feel or see a vaginal bulge? Do you feel pressure in the vagina?

* Meets POP-Q criteria on exam for stage I, II, or III prolapse
* Interested in PFPT for management of POP
* Normal mammogram within 1 year of enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior surgery for prolapse or incontinence
* Other prior interventions for prolapse (e.g. pessary, PFPT)
* Previous bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (women with 1 ovary will be eligible)
* Known liver dysfunction
* Connective tissue diseases known to affect collagen or elastin remodeling (including: Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Scleroderma, Sjogrens syndrome, Marfan syndrome, and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
* Unevaluated abnormal vaginal bleeding or abnormal pap smear in the previous year
* BMI \> 35 kg/m2
* Estrogen therapy (including birth control) in the previous year
* Current or prior breast or pelvic malignancy (ovarian, tubal, uterine, cervical or vaginal)
* Contraindication to hormone use (i.e. thromboembolic disorder, use of anti-coagulants, coronary artery disease, history of stroke)
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Urogynecologic Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pamela Moalli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pamela Moalli

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laura C Skoczylas, MD, MS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Pittsburgh

Pamela Moalli, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HD061811

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY19030408

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.