GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT ID: NCT00521066
Last Updated: 2014-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-06-30
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
(\*TRADEMARK)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Performance of GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System for Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT01396122
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Uterine Prolapse Stage III
NCT01396109
Clinical Performance of the GYNECARE PROLIFT + M* Pelvic Floor Repair System as a Device for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00833001
A Large Multi-Center Database of Women Who Have Had and Are Going to Have Surgical Correction of Their Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using the Gynecare Prolift System
NCT01134003
GYNEMESH PS Mesh Post Marketing Clinical Follow-Up Study
NCT04829058
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Prosima Pelvic Floor Repair System
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System
procedure for pelvic organ prolapse
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System
procedure for pelvic organ prolapse
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years.
* Agrees to participate in the study, including completion of all study-related procedures, evaluations and questionnaires, and documents this agreement by signing the Ethics Committee / IRB approved informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous repair of pelvic organ prolapse involving insertion of mesh.
* Previous hysterectomy within 6 months of scheduled surgery.
* Experimental drug or experimental medical device within 3 months prior to the planned procedure.
* Active genital, urinary or systemic infection at the time of the surgical procedure. Surgery may be delayed in such subjects until the infection is cleared.
* Coagulation disorder or on therapeutic anticoagulant therapy at the time of surgery.
* History of chemotherapy or pelvic radiation therapy.
* Systemic disease known to affect bladder or bowel function (e.g. Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, spinal cord injury or trauma).
* Current evaluation or treatment for chronic pelvic pain (e.g. interstitial cystitis, endometriosis, coccydynia, vulvodynia).
* Nursing or pregnant or intends future pregnancy.
* In the investigator's opinion, any medical condition or psychiatric illness that could potentially be life threatening or affect their ability to complete the study visits according to this protocol.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ethicon, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Robinson, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ethicon, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Specialists in Urology
Naples, Florida, United States
Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogynecology Institute of Michigan
Dearborn, Michigan, United States
Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
The Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Magee Women's Hospital of the Universtiy of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Royal Women's Hospital
Melbourne, , Australia
Bereich Urogynakologie
Halle, , Germany
Universitatsklinik Tubingen
Tübingen, , Germany
Addenbrookes Hospital
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
North Hampshire Hospital
Hampshire, , United Kingdom
St. Mary's Hospital
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zyczynski HM, Carey MP, Smith AR, Gauld JM, Robinson D, Sikirica V, Reisenauer C, Slack M; Prosima Study Investigators. One-year clinical outcomes after prolapse surgery with nonanchored mesh and vaginal support device. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;203(6):587.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.001.
Sayer T, Lim J, Gauld JM, Hinoul P, Jones P, Franco N, Van Drie D, Slack M; Prosima Study Investigators. Medium-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair for vaginal prolapse with tension-free mesh and vaginal support device. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):487-93. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1600-3. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
300-06-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.