Enabling Self-Care for Pessary Users in Rural Setting

NCT ID: NCT07084818

Last Updated: 2025-11-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-10

Study Completion Date

2026-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is to see if a using new collapsible pessary (Reia pessary) for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse will allow patients to care for their prolapse on their own, rather than having to come to be seen by a provider in the office regularly (2-4 times per year) to manage the pessary. Enrollment in the study will be offered to current patients who have regular office visits to care for their pessary.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective interventional trial for patients with at least stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse (POP), who are currently managing their POP with office-based care using a pessary. The study will be conducted at two institutions, Dartmouth-Hitchcock and Pennsylvania State University. The intervention will be to convert willing patients from office-based care to self-care, using a new, collapsible (Reia) pessary in patients. The primary outcome will be a visual analog score (VAS) regarding their current satisfaction with their treatment and management of POP. Secondary outcomes will include questionnaires on impact, travel for care and self-care. The comparison group will be patients who decline to try the new pessary but agree to questionnaires regarding their current office-based care for pessary management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Intervention group will be subjects trying new collapsible pessary and providing self-care of their pessary. Control group will be subjects continuing with their current pessary and office-based care of their pessary.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Self-Care

Subjects who switch to new, collapsible pessary and convert to self-management for care of their pelvic organ prolapse.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reia System pessary self-care management

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Reia-System pessary is an FDA-cleared device to manage pelvic organ prolapse which is collapsible and intended to be more easily removed, with less discomfort.

Office-Care

Subjects who continue office-based pessary care of their pelvic organ prolapse with visits every 3-6 months annually.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard pessary office-based management

Intervention Type DEVICE

These subjects will continue with the current pessary they are using to manage their prolapse, with office-based care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reia System pessary self-care management

The Reia-System pessary is an FDA-cleared device to manage pelvic organ prolapse which is collapsible and intended to be more easily removed, with less discomfort.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard pessary office-based management

These subjects will continue with the current pessary they are using to manage their prolapse, with office-based care.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

collapsible pessary Ring pessary, Gellhorn pessary, donut pessary, cube pessary

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women currently using office-based pessary management of at least stage 2 POP will be recruited:
* English-speaking natal females 18 years or older
* Stage II-IV POP desiring continued pessary management.
* Primary indication for pessary management is treatment of POP

Exclusion Criteria

* Primary indication for pessary is for management of stress urinary incontinence
* Vesicovaginal fistula or rectovaginal fistula
* Vaginal, rectal or bladder malignancy
* Genitourinary infection requiring treatment\*
* Ongoing treatment for vaginal infections (e.g., chronic bacterial vaginosis)\*
* Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's or ulcerative colitis)
* Pelvic or anorectal chronic pain
* Pelvic floor surgery within the past 6 months or planning to undergo pelvic floor surgery
* Congenital malformation of the bladder, rectum or vagina
* The following special populations will be excluded:

Adults unable to consent Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers) Pregnant women (or planning pregnancy in the next 6 months) (women of childbearing age will be verbally queried and offered pregnancy testing if uncertain) Prisoners

\*Patients with acute vaginal infections will be eligible for enrollment 2 weeks after completing treatment and have resolution of symptoms
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Penn State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kris.Strohbehn

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kris Strohbehn, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Strohbehn K, Wadensweiler PM, Richter HE, Grimes CL, Rardin CR, Rosenblatt PL, Toglia MR, Siddiqui G, Hanissian P. Effectiveness and safety of a novel, collapsible pessary for management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):271.e1-271.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38761837 (View on PubMed)

Strohbehn K, Wadensweiler P, Hanissian P. A novel, collapsible, space-occupying pessary for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):317-319. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05415-y. Epub 2022 Dec 3. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36462059 (View on PubMed)

Eton DT, Yost KJ, Lai JS, Ridgeway JL, Egginton JS, Rosedahl JK, Linzer M, Boehm DH, Thakur A, Poplau S, Odell L, Montori VM, May CR, Anderson RT. Development and validation of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden. Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):489-503. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1397-0. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27566732 (View on PubMed)

Chen X, Orom H, Hay JL, Waters EA, Schofield E, Li Y, Kiviniemi MT. Differences in Rural and Urban Health Information Access and Use. J Rural Health. 2019 Jun;35(3):405-417. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12335. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30444935 (View on PubMed)

Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16021067 (View on PubMed)

Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 May;21(5):523-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5. Epub 2009 Dec 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20013110 (View on PubMed)

Kearney R, Brown C. Self-management of vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Oct 21;3(1):u206180.w2533. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206180.w2533. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27493737 (View on PubMed)

Dwyer L, Rajai A, Dowding D, Kearney R. Understanding Factors That Affect Willingness to Self-Manage a Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study of Pessary-Using Women in the UK. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Aug;35(8):1627-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05840-1. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38953998 (View on PubMed)

Sung VW, Jeppson P, Madsen A. Nonoperative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr 1;141(4):724-736. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005121. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36897185 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

02003005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pessary Experience Study
NCT06021769 RECRUITING
Ambulatory Pessary Trial
NCT02746913 WITHDRAWN NA