Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-10
2026-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Feasibility Study of the Reia Vaginal Pessary
NCT04275089
Feasibility Study of the Reia Vaginal Pessary
NCT04508335
What Affects Willingness to Self-manage a Pessary?
NCT05750615
Prediction of Postsurgical Symptomatic Outcomes With Preoperative Pessary Use
NCT02680145
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00521066
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Self-Care
Subjects who switch to new, collapsible pessary and convert to self-management for care of their pelvic organ prolapse.
Reia System pessary self-care management
The Reia-System pessary is an FDA-cleared device to manage pelvic organ prolapse which is collapsible and intended to be more easily removed, with less discomfort.
Office-Care
Subjects who continue office-based pessary care of their pelvic organ prolapse with visits every 3-6 months annually.
Standard pessary office-based management
These subjects will continue with the current pessary they are using to manage their prolapse, with office-based care.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Reia System pessary self-care management
The Reia-System pessary is an FDA-cleared device to manage pelvic organ prolapse which is collapsible and intended to be more easily removed, with less discomfort.
Standard pessary office-based management
These subjects will continue with the current pessary they are using to manage their prolapse, with office-based care.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English-speaking natal females 18 years or older
* Stage II-IV POP desiring continued pessary management.
* Primary indication for pessary management is treatment of POP
Exclusion Criteria
* Vesicovaginal fistula or rectovaginal fistula
* Vaginal, rectal or bladder malignancy
* Genitourinary infection requiring treatment\*
* Ongoing treatment for vaginal infections (e.g., chronic bacterial vaginosis)\*
* Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's or ulcerative colitis)
* Pelvic or anorectal chronic pain
* Pelvic floor surgery within the past 6 months or planning to undergo pelvic floor surgery
* Congenital malformation of the bladder, rectum or vagina
* The following special populations will be excluded:
Adults unable to consent Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers) Pregnant women (or planning pregnancy in the next 6 months) (women of childbearing age will be verbally queried and offered pregnancy testing if uncertain) Prisoners
\*Patients with acute vaginal infections will be eligible for enrollment 2 weeks after completing treatment and have resolution of symptoms
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Penn State University
OTHER
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kris.Strohbehn
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kris Strohbehn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Strohbehn K, Wadensweiler PM, Richter HE, Grimes CL, Rardin CR, Rosenblatt PL, Toglia MR, Siddiqui G, Hanissian P. Effectiveness and safety of a novel, collapsible pessary for management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):271.e1-271.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 16.
Strohbehn K, Wadensweiler P, Hanissian P. A novel, collapsible, space-occupying pessary for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):317-319. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05415-y. Epub 2022 Dec 3. No abstract available.
Eton DT, Yost KJ, Lai JS, Ridgeway JL, Egginton JS, Rosedahl JK, Linzer M, Boehm DH, Thakur A, Poplau S, Odell L, Montori VM, May CR, Anderson RT. Development and validation of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden. Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):489-503. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1397-0. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
Chen X, Orom H, Hay JL, Waters EA, Schofield E, Li Y, Kiviniemi MT. Differences in Rural and Urban Health Information Access and Use. J Rural Health. 2019 Jun;35(3):405-417. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12335. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 May;21(5):523-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
Kearney R, Brown C. Self-management of vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Oct 21;3(1):u206180.w2533. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206180.w2533. eCollection 2014.
Dwyer L, Rajai A, Dowding D, Kearney R. Understanding Factors That Affect Willingness to Self-Manage a Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study of Pessary-Using Women in the UK. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Aug;35(8):1627-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05840-1. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
Sung VW, Jeppson P, Madsen A. Nonoperative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr 1;141(4):724-736. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005121. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
02003005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.