Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Plus Mini-Sling Versus Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Alone
NCT ID: NCT01384084
Last Updated: 2014-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-06-30
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study was designed to compare whether, in the treatment of patients with uro-genital prolapse and urinary incontinence, the addition of a contemporary anti-incontinence procedure such as mini-sling is associated with a reduction of post-operative urinary incontinence (correction of pre-existent urinary incontinence and prevention of masked urinary incontinence).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With or Without Concomitant Burch Colposuspension in Patients With Urinary Incontinence
NCT00576004
Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence During or Following Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00697489
Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Mid Urethral Sling Trial
NCT00460434
Early Versus Late Voiding Trials After Prolapse Repair
NCT02739256
Surgical Study Comparing 2 Procedures for the Treatment of a Dropped Bladder
NCT00271102
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
POP repair plus mini-sling
Patients affected by urogenital prolapse and urinary incontinence, who are candidates for pelvic organ prolapsed repair using sacropexy, will receive sacropexy plus anti-incontinence procedure (mini-sling).
POP repair plus mini-sling
For POP, the anterior vaginal wall is dissected from the bladder to expose a vaginal wall area where the mesh will be attached. The procedure is repeated for the posterior vaginal wall. The sacral promontory surface is prepared and 1 non-reabsorbable sutures are placed into the sacral periosteum.
A mini sling system will be used, placing a urethral low-tension tape anchored to the obturator muscles bilaterally at the level of tendinous arc. This mini-sling is a polypropylene monofilament mesh.
pelvic organ prolapse repair
Patients affected by urogenital prolapsed and urinary incontinence, who are candidates for pelvic organ prolapsed repair using sacropexy, will receive sacropexy alone.
POP repair
For POP repair, the anterior vaginal wall is dissected from the bladder to expose a vaginal wall area where the mesh will be attached. The procedure is repeated for the posterior vaginal wall. The sacral promontory surface is prepared and 1 non-reabsorbable sutures are placed into the sacral periosteum. The peritoneum is closed over the meshes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
POP repair plus mini-sling
For POP, the anterior vaginal wall is dissected from the bladder to expose a vaginal wall area where the mesh will be attached. The procedure is repeated for the posterior vaginal wall. The sacral promontory surface is prepared and 1 non-reabsorbable sutures are placed into the sacral periosteum.
A mini sling system will be used, placing a urethral low-tension tape anchored to the obturator muscles bilaterally at the level of tendinous arc. This mini-sling is a polypropylene monofilament mesh.
POP repair
For POP repair, the anterior vaginal wall is dissected from the bladder to expose a vaginal wall area where the mesh will be attached. The procedure is repeated for the posterior vaginal wall. The sacral promontory surface is prepared and 1 non-reabsorbable sutures are placed into the sacral periosteum. The peritoneum is closed over the meshes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Candidates for pelvic organ prolapsed repair using sacropexy
* Prospectively randomized, using a predetermined computer-generated randomization code (4 blocks), to sacropexy plus anti-incontinence procedure (mini-sling) or sacropexy alone
Exclusion Criteria
* contraindication to major surgery
* uterine cancer
18 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Of Perugia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luigi Mearini
senior assistant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Urology Dept. University of Perugia
Perugia, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M, Zucchi A, Porena M. Pelvic organ prolapse repair with and without prophylactic concomitant Burch colposuspension in continent women: a randomized, controlled trial with 8-year followup. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.078. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Zucchi A, Bini V, Mearini L, Porena M. Five-year outcome of uterus sparing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a single-center experience. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1342-7. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD, Chapple CR, Costantini E, Ficarra V, Hilton P, Nilsson CG, Waltregny D. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):218-38. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.022. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M, Zucchi A, Porena M. Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial. J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1007-12. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
Carter E, Johnson EE, Still M, Al-Assaf AS, Bryant A, Aluko P, Jeffery ST, Nambiar A. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UPerugia-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.