Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Mid Urethral Sling Trial
NCT ID: NCT00460434
Last Updated: 2018-05-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
337 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-05-31
2011-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Burch Urethropexy and Mid-urethral Sling Performed Concomitantly With a Sacral Colpopexy
NCT00934999
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Plus Mini-Sling Versus Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Alone
NCT01384084
Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Accompanied by Mid Urethral Sling Versus no Sling for Reduction of Postoperative Incontinence
NCT04251923
Effect of a Risk Calculator on Patient Satisfaction With the Decision for Midurethral Sling During Prolapse Surgery
NCT02111642
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With or Without Concomitant Burch Colposuspension in Patients With Urinary Incontinence
NCT00576004
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary aims are:
In stress continent women planning vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse:
1. To determine if the failure rate defined by subsequent treatment for urinary incontinence, signs or symptoms of bothersome urinary incontinence \[defined as having at least moderate bother for any of 4 Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) incontinence items\] differs between vaginal prolapse repair and vaginal prolapse repair plus TVT® during the first 3 months after the index surgery.
2. To determine if the prevalence of bothersome urinary incontinence at 12 months after the index surgery differs between vaginal prolapse repair and vaginal prolapse repair plus TVT®, whether or not there was subsequent treatment for symptoms of urinary incontinence; i.e., to determine whether symptom-specific treatment of incontinence after prolapse surgery is equally effective to prophylactic treatment by adding a TVT® at the time of the prolapse surgery.
3. To measure the total cost of care and relate the difference in cost of care between the two groups to differences in health utilities and health-related quality of life, which will allow us to examine the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic use of a TVT® at the time of prolapse surgery versus symptom-specific treatment of stress incontinence after prolapse surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT) surgery
TVT
Prophylactic TVT
2
Sham Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT) surgery
Sham
Sham TVT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TVT
Prophylactic TVT
Sham
Sham TVT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Do you usually have a sensation of bulging or protrusion from the vaginal area?
* Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area? Anterior vaginal prolapse defined by pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) Point Aa ≥ -1 cm (i.e., -1,0,1,2, or 3 cm).
Surgical plan that includes a vaginal approach for apical or anterior prolapse repair.
Able and willing to complete data collection per protocol, including written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
Untreated urinary tract infection (may be included after resolution).
Overt symptoms of stress urinary incontinence as defined by a positive response to any of the following 3 PFDI items:
* Do you usually experience urine leakage related to coughing, sneezing, or laughing?
* Do you usually experience urine leakage related to physical exercise such as walking, running, aerobics, or tennis?
* Do you usually experience urine leakage related to lifting or bending over? Currently being treated for stress urinary incontinence with pessary/incontinence ring, pelvic floor muscle exercise or medication (duloxetine and imipramine, and alpha agonists).
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH)
NIH
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John T Wei, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Michigan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
USCD Medical Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente
San Diego, California, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
UT Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Nager CW, Barber MD, Kenton K, Amundsen CL, Schaffer J, Meikle SF, Spino C; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2358-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111967.
Lukacz ES, Sridhar A, Chermansky CJ, Rahn DD, Harvie HS, Gantz MG, Varner RE, Korbly NB, Mazloomdoost D; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN). Sexual Activity and Dyspareunia 1 Year After Surgical Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):492-500. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003992.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15P01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.