BELIEVE Trial: Bulking vErsus sLing for Treating Stress Urinary IncontinEnce at the Time of Vaginal prolapsE Repair (BELIEVE)

NCT ID: NCT06754046

Last Updated: 2025-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

476 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-01

Study Completion Date

2029-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if retropubic midurethral sling (RP-MUS) or bulkamide injection (PAHG) at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair is better from the patient's perspective. The main questions it aims to answer are:

What is the average difference in the urogenital distress inventory (UDI) long form score 24 months after surgery for each procedure? Which procedure has the fewest complications and lowest short- and long-term morbidity profile?

Participants will:

Be blinded and randomized to one of two procedures for the duration of the study, 24 months.

Complete 6 total visits for the clinical trial including validated questionnaires.

Few participants will be selected to complete a qualitative interview at 3 timepoints over 24 month duration of the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a double-blinded, non-inferiority, controlled trial utilizing a 1:1 randomization scheme to assign patients to each treatment arm (PAHG vs. RP-MUS). Patients undergoing PAHG will be given sham incisions in order to mask the type of SUI procedure they underwent. This will consist of two "earring-hole" sized superficial scratches in the epidermis and fibrin glue applied to the expected suprapubic exit sites for the RP-MUS. Sham incisions are not associated with an increased risk of infection and are considered low risk. Validated symptom questionnaires will be administered to the patient by a study investigator prior to surgery and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. At the final study visit, patients will be un-blinded and provided information on which SUI procedure they underwent. Unless it is necessary for subsequent care, as in the case of a procedure specific complication like a mesh erosion, patients who might require additional intervention for recurrent SUI during the study period will remain blinded to their initial treatment assignment. If patients request this information, they will be informed that they would need to exit the study, however their data would still be analyzed as part of the intention to treat protocol. Data of patients who dropout will be analyzed in the same manner. Pelvic organ prolapse procedures will be limited to native tissue repairs only and may include either or both apical and non-apical repair procedures; selection of appropriate POP repair procedure will be at the surgeon's discretion. All randomized patients will complete surveys at 12 and 24 months will assess patient recovery, satisfaction with care, and calibrating surveyed and clinically assessed outcomes to their daily life experiences. Based on prior similar studies, this number is sufficient to ensure saturation of themes83. Between 8 to 20 participants in each arm will be randomly selected from across all sites to participate in individual semi-structured telephone interviews preoperatively, at 12 months and at 24 months after surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Urinary Incontinence Vaginal Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Retropubic Midurethral Sling (RP-MUS)

A minimally invasive surgical procedure that treats stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women by placing a small strip of tape passed through the retropubic space, with entry and exit points in the lower abdomen or groin.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RP-MUS

Intervention Type DEVICE

a standard urethral sling placement for treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Urethral Bulking with polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG)

PAHG will be performed using the standard 2 mL dose injection order and number will be at the discretion of the surgeon. Patients undergoing PAHG will be given sham incisions consisting of superficial suprapubic epidermal scratches with a needle and fibrin glue at expected sling exit sites.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PAHG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A standard 2 mL dose injection of bulkamid (order and number will be at the discretion of the surgeon) will be given. Patients undergoing PAHG will be given sham incisions consisting of superficial suprapubic epidermal scratches with a needle and fibrin glue at expected sling exit sites.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RP-MUS

a standard urethral sling placement for treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Intervention Type DEVICE

PAHG

A standard 2 mL dose injection of bulkamid (order and number will be at the discretion of the surgeon) will be given. Patients undergoing PAHG will be given sham incisions consisting of superficial suprapubic epidermal scratches with a needle and fibrin glue at expected sling exit sites.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women ≥ 18 years of age.
* Have diagnosis of symptomatic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) as noted in their electronic health record (EHR).
* Proof of positive testing for SUI via cough stress test (CST) and/or Urodynamic (UDS) testing,
* Patients that are planning and eligible for vaginal prolapse repair and for both Retropubic Midurethral Sling (RP-MUS) and Polyacrylamide Hydrogel (PAHG)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair using mesh or biologic augmentation other than patient's own tissue
* Patient anticipating difficulty with completing 24-month follow-up
* Anticipation of pregnancy within subsequent 24-months or \<18 months post-partum
* Hemoglobin A1c \>10.0% within the past 3-months
* Current smoker \> 1 pack per week
* History of neurogenic bladder
* Current use of any catheterization including but not limited to, intermittent catheterization, indwelling Foley catheter, or suprapubic catheter
* Post-void residual \>150 mL felt to not be due to obstruction for prolapse
* Prior history of any anti-incontinence procedure including but not limited to any synthetic sling, fascial sling, Burch colposuspension or its variants, and urethral bulking
* Previous history of any pelvic radiation
* Patient receiving a planned concurrent procedure at the time of prolapse repair.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kaiser Permanente

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Irvine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

MetroHealth Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of New Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medstar Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Sheyn

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Sheyn, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Cecile Ferrando, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Diego

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Elisar Khawam

Role: CONTACT

216-844-2493

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Elisar Khawam

Role: primary

216-844-2493

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY20241497

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pessary Experience Study
NCT06021769 RECRUITING