Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
103 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-05-24
2022-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predictors of Recovery Expectancy
NCT04274491
Comparison of Post-operative Symptoms After Two Surgeries for Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05697796
A Feasibility Study on the Value of Pelvic Floor Training After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT04539782
Pelvic Floor Exercise Before Surgery in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03064750
PREPARE: Perioperative REhabilitation Around Vaginal Prolapse RepAir Surgery for Recovery Enhancement
NCT07265973
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Participants undergoing major pelvic organ prolapse surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English speaking
* Successfully discharged on the day of surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Dementia or altered mental status that would make recall of recovery process unreliable.
* Inability to access Internet or phone for study participation
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ann Tran
MD, Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ann Tran, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U, Arestedt KF, Unosson M. Psychometric evaluation of the post-discharge surgical recovery scale. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Aug;16(4):794-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01197.x. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
Kleinbeck SV. Self-reported at-home postoperative recovery. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Dec;23(6):461-72. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200012)23:63.0.CO;2-S.
Lassen PD, Moeller-Larsen H, DE Nully P. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Nov;91(11):1339-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01535.x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
Manohar A, Cheung K, Wu CL, Stierer TS. Burden incurred by patients and their caregivers after outpatient surgery: a prospective observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1416-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3270-6.
Myles PS. Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):396-401. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000612.
Wu CL, Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Fleisher LA. Systematic review and analysis of postdischarge symptoms after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):994-1003. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00030. No abstract available.
Berg K, Kjellgren K, Unosson M, Arestedt K. Postoperative recovery and its association with health-related quality of life among day surgery patients. BMC Nurs. 2012 Nov 13;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-24.
Bouwsma EVA, Anema JR, Vonk Noordegraaf A, de Vet HCW, Huirne JAF. Using patient data to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations after gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0317-8.
Carpenter JS, Heit M, Chen CX, Stewart R, Hamner J, Rand KL. Validating the Postdischarge Surgical Recovery Scale 13 as a Measure of Perceived Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):86-89. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000352.
Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.
Dambi JM, Corten L, Chiwaridzo M, Jack H, Mlambo T, Jelsma J. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural translations and adaptations of the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 2;16(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0912-0.
Evenson M, Payne D, Nygaard I. Recovery at home after major gynecologic surgery: how do our patients fare? Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):780-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824bb15e.
Heit M, Carpenter JS, Chen CX, Stewart R, Hamner J, Rand KL. Predictors of Postdischarge Surgical Recovery Following Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Prospective Cohort Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;26(5):320-326. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000599.
Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB 20-01766
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.