Optimization of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Robotic Systems

NCT ID: NCT05712291

Last Updated: 2023-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For the first time, it is planned to create algorithms for working with a robotic system at different patient flow rates, optimize the use of computed tomography to assess bone density and pronounced osteophytes, develop an algorithm and tactics for treating bilateral osteoarthrosis of the knee joint using an active robotic system. Aim: optimization of total knee arthroplasty using robotic systems and improvement of treatment outcomes. Objectives: to develop algorithms for preoperative planning, surgical intervention using an active robotic system; to improve the technique of active robotic total knee arthroplasty in osteoporosis, osteosclerosis and pronounced osteophytes; to develop a tactic for the treatment of patients with bilateral osteoarthrosis of the knee joint using an active robotic system. It is planned to conduct an open-label retrospective and prospective clinical study in parallel observations.The study is planned to include 250 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint stage 3-4 (according to Kellgren-Lawrence). The methodology developed and improved in the dissertation will be introduced into the work of the clinical Departments of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, studying the learning curve.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Relevance: Robotic orthopedic surgery has been around for over twenty years and is becoming more relevant every day. Modern systems consist of a robotic arm, robotic cutting tools and robotic milling systems with a variety of navigation systems with using active, semi-automatic or passive control systems. In the analysis of clinical studies, it can be concluded that these robotic systems reduce variability and increase the accuracy of positioning and alignment of prosthesis components. A new generation of robotic systems is currently being actively introduced into the field of arthroplasty interventions, which can eliminate pain and improve the quality of life of patients with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee joint.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the terminal stages of gonarthrosis is one of the most effective and technologically advanced operations. More than 700,000 surgeries are performed annually in the United States and the number continues to grow. According to the literature in Russia for 2011-2019. out of 27,906 TKAs, the proportion of primary arthroplasties was 92.3% (n = 25,759). It should be noted that the number of operations of primary knee arthroplasty increased almost 2 times - from 1678 in 2011 up to 3,730 in 2019. Therefore, TKA is attracting attention from many manufacturers of robotic surgical systems.

With the introduction of an active robotic system into clinical practice, a number of problems have arisen: high time costs of perioperative actions; the operation of an active robotic unit with high or low bone density, pronounced osteophytes; operation of an active robotic unit in bilateral TKA.

The novelty of the proposed topic: For the first time in Russia it is planned to create algorithms for working with a robotic system at different patient flow rates, optimize the use of computed tomography to assess bone density and pronounced osteophytes, develop an algorithm and tactics for treating bilateral osteoarthrosis of the knee joint using an active robotic system.

Aim and objectives of the research:

Aim: optimization of total knee arthroplasty using robotic systems and improvement of treatment outcomes.

Objectives: to develop algorithms for preoperative planning, surgical intervention using an active robotic system; to improve the technique of active robotic total knee arthroplasty in osteoporosis, osteosclerosis and pronounced osteophytes; to develop a tactic for the treatment of patients with bilateral osteoarthrosis of the knee joint using an active robotic system.

Type of new research: an open-label, retrospective and prospective observational clinical study in parallel groups.

Research object and number of observations: the study is planned to include 250 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint of stage 3-4 (according to Kellgren-Lawrence).

Methods of the research:

1. General clinical examination of patients (collection of complaints, examination, assessment of physical findings and local status);
2. Assessment of the range of motion in the knee joint before and after surgery;
3. Performing X-ray images and CT of the knee joint before and after surgery, with the determination of the angles: HKA, LDFA, MPTA, Q; Preoperative 3D planning on the TPLAN workstation; Surgical treatment. 1) Primary total knee arthroplasty using the active robotic surgical system TSolution One, TCAT.

Evaluation of patient treatment results according to scales: VAS, KSS, OKS, WOMAC, ASA, FJS-12.

Methods of statistical processing of the material: statistical processing of data is planned to be carried out on a personal computer using Excel software packages and using standard methods of variation statistics using SPSS 16 statistical software packages.

Estimated research result:

Algorithms of actions for preoperative planning and surgical intervention will be developed.

An approach will be developed for the diagnosis, classification and treatment of patients with pronounced areas of osteosclerosis of the knee joint during robotic total knee arthroplasty.

An approach will be developed for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with concomitant osteoporosis in robotic total knee arthroplasty.

A tactic for the treatment of patients with bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee joint of stage 3-4 (according to Kellgren-Lawrence) will be proposed.

The methodology developed and improved in the dissertation will be introduced into the work of the clinical bases of the Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

total knee arthroplasty using the active robotic system

Total knee arthroplasty using the active robotic surgical system TSolution One TCAT, and system for planning TPlan

Group Type OTHER

Total knee arthroplasty using the active robotic surgical system

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total knee arthroplasty using the active robotic surgical system TSolution One TCAT, and system for planning TPlan

TSolution One TCAT, and system for planning TPlan

Intervention Type DEVICE

the active robotic surgical system TSolution One TCAT, and system for planning TPlan

total knee arthroplasty using the standard manual technic

Primary total knee arthroplasty using the standard recommended set of instruments

Group Type OTHER

total knee arthroplasty using the standard manual technic

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

total knee arthroplasty using the standard manual technic

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total knee arthroplasty using the active robotic surgical system

Total knee arthroplasty using the active robotic surgical system TSolution One TCAT, and system for planning TPlan

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TSolution One TCAT, and system for planning TPlan

the active robotic surgical system TSolution One TCAT, and system for planning TPlan

Intervention Type DEVICE

total knee arthroplasty using the standard manual technic

total knee arthroplasty using the standard manual technic

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Availability of written informed consent of the patient to participate in the study;
2. Patients with stage 3-4 osteoarthritis of the knee joint (according to Kellgren-Lawrence).
3. Men and women from 21 to 90 years old.
4. Pain in the knee joint above 3 points according to VAS
5. Opportunity for observations during the entire study period (12 months);
6. Mental adequacy, ability, willingness to cooperate and to fulfill the doctor's recommendations.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Refusal of the patient from surgical treatment;
2. Presence of contraindications to surgical treatment;
3. Severe forms of diabetes mellitus (glycosylated hemoglobin\> 9%);
4. Diseases of the blood (thrombopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia with Hb \<90 g / l);
5. The patient's unwillingness to conscious cooperation.
6. Refusal of the patient to participate in the study;
7. Non-compliance with the hospital regimen, according to the order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia dated 01.08.07, No. 514;
8. The impossibility of observing the patient within the control period after the operation.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrey Gritsyuk, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The First MSMU (I.M.Sechenov).The Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University clinical hospital №1 I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. The Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alexey Lychagin, PhD

Role: CONTACT

89166389545

Maxim Gavlovsky

Role: CONTACT

89100132671

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maxim Gavlovsky

Role: primary

89100132671

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

LYCHAGIN A.V.1, a, GRITSYUK A.A.1, b, RUKIN Y.A.1, c, ELIZAROV M.P.1, d, THE HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROBOTICS IN SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS (LITERATURE REVIEW). 2020; 1 (39)2020: 10.17238/issn2226-2016.2020.1.13-19

Reference Type BACKGROUND

LYCHAGIN A.V. 1, a, RUKIN Y.A. 1, b, GRITSYUK A.A. 1, c, ELIZAROV M.P. 1, d, FIRST EXPERIENCE OF USING AN ACTIVE ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. 2019; 4 (38) 2019: 10.17238/issn2226-2016.2019.4.27-33

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

199617

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Comparative Study of Knee Systems
NCT01331278 COMPLETED PHASE4